No. Wrong again. The judge wrote that even though he viewed the arguments in the most favorable light to the plaintiff (DID NOT STATE THE INFORMATION WAS FACTUAL) - no civil rights had been violated & he was thereby dismissing the case. To RE-Clarify - the suit was brought as a *violation of MBs civil rights.” The suit was DISMISSED bc the judge found no civil rights had been violated. It was dismissed on the exact same grounds it was brought. And……. even with the judge (in writing) stating that he viewed the complaint in the MOST FAVORABLE LIGHT TO THE PLAINTIFF. That does not equal “the judge found the complaint to be factual.” Hopefully, you’re all cleared up now.
If you’re not, go back to that thread. You can try and post on it- but I think you’ll find it has been CLOSED. I understand that to mean, “for very specific reasons, this thread has been closed.” I’m sure I’ll have to explain this to you again. Just a hunch.