I’m asking you questions to understand what happened.
Why do you work on understanding why this is absolutely none of your business and how you are apparently gleefully hurting people without the full story?
Your lawyer husband, the other family members who are lawyers haven’t offered a theory as to why these damning audio outlining the murder plot were left out?
So you transcribed it, so must know it quite well… What was the plot?
None of our business?
Gleefully hurting people?
You’re kidding, right?
Again, none of your business Angela_Freda.
Strange, someone offered up to move her horses and your hubby had arranged a place that Lauren refused to go to (per the testimony of your lawyer).
The facts that your side said under oath are ruining all of your stories.
You could ask your husband to explain it to you. Likely has something to do with the recordings are illegal.
Isn’t there some order in place that your whole family is not not supposed to be talking about MHG?
So you’re saying you cannot specify a point when she said that in her testimony, correct?
Good to know.
Ok but, to anyone else the failure to explain these simple, obvious (I mean, dull me sees them!) questions looks like what it really indicates it’s not true.
Hey someone go to Law & Crime and tell all the commenters this case is none of their business. Let me know how it goes!
Didn’t you ever wonder why everyone all of a sudden everyone admitted that Michael did it? That is why. They heard the tapes and read the transcripts themselves… both prosecution and defense. That is why Mr Balinkas changed the defense strategy officially to not guilty by reason of insanity instead of Not Guilty. They knew they couldn’t get that once everyone and their uncle knew he did it.
MB or his attorney never admitted he did it.
Bilinkas wanted self defense. Judge threw that out.
Maybe try the same thing with the nice news people at 48 Hours! Lol.
Strange that I don’t remember “everyone all of a sudden admitting that Michael did it”.
The certainly did Knights Mom. That is why they no longer looked for a “not guilty” plea.
If the tapes changed everyone’s mind, then they should have used them. Slam dunk, right?
It’s weird that they instead chose not to.
You are wrong. Very, very wrong.
They stopped looking for a “not guilty” defense. This is an admission of guilt.
No Angela_Freda… You are wrong.
I haven’t made a claim
I’m asking you questions.
Once cannot argue with someone who is uninformed. bye bye