Her testimony in the trial was that she met him as a teenager, and that she was “in a relationship with” him in 2015.
I said I’ve seen the explanation about the “no contact directive” on MB from SS.
Eggbutt says there is something else from USEF.
All top people in all levels of life have connections to other top level people in life…? Doesn’t make it sinister - I think some of us are at the top level or close to in our professions or sports …. That doesn’t mean we are in the mafia….
I’ve had at least 6 concussions. I’m now in my thirties and I believe I’m starting to have some memory issues. It could be the fact that I’m not taking my ADHD meds but I haven’t taken them in years and had no memory issues. The brain is miraculous and mysterious.
That is incorrect. LK said she shot a tire not RG. Still wrong to do but a far cry from shooting at a person or even pointing a gun at a person.
Correction!! She shot a tire on the motorcycle RG was sitting on.
Did she clarify romantic relationship? I know I reference my relationships with friends as well as my relationship with trainers and I’m not romantically involved with any of them.
Maybe she is a bad shot….
hut-ho78:That is incorrect. LK said she shot a tire not RG. Still wrong to do but a far cry from shooting at a person or even pointing a gun at a person.
Correction!! She shot a tire on the motorcycle RG was sitting on.
Wow. Really??
Unless he was sitting on a remarkably large motorcycle, that was pretty darn close to shooting at him.
And? Many people on these forums have “connections” with USEF/USDF, myself included. So? What constitutes connections in your opinion and what benefit do you believe is gained?
How in the heck does Donald Trump play into this? Bizarre.
That’s what I recall as well
Eggbutt says there is something else from USEF.
No, let’s be clear. You asked who would have prepared the no contact order I’ve mentioned and I said I assumed USEF since they have the huge complaint.
Many of IMs posts made little sense and held even smaller amounts of truth.
Many of IMs posts made little sense and held even smaller amounts of truth.
Even though he claimed he knew “everything!”
Yes but then he also retracted that later saying he has no inside information.
False in one false in all
hut-ho78: DownYonder: hut-ho78:Are you asking the basis for my question as to how would LK and family think the horses would be cared for by the same people who just shot her twice and whom she had been at odds with before? It seems that all parties were concerned with safety and horse care. RC was sleeping in the barn aisle outside of Didi’s stall. LK was worried about barn fires. Her family was worried about horse care after she was shot twice. It was a deteriorating situation. This all came out in court.
Sorry, that argument makes no sense. (Or as we say in the south, that dog won’t hunt.)
People that concerned about the welfare of horses would not have abused horses belonging to someone else, nor would they have neglected to provide critical care for them as needed. Unlike a certain other couple living on the proper, MB/NHG/RC/JH, etc., just don’t sound like they are vindictive enough to willfully harm someone else’s horses.
Oh, and another thing - didn’t LK allege that the reason MB tried to “murder” them was because MHG wanted her horses? Now why in the world would someone allow abuse or neglect to happen to a horse she was wanted for herself?
Sorry you lost me with MB and company not being vindictive enough to not care for the horses when MB shot LK twice. I don’t think anyone was quite rational. Per Eggbutt, LO closed the barn and paid to ship MB’s horses to Florida herself with no help from MHG, JH, or RC. So if what Eggbutt heard and repeated is correct then it’s not that they were vindictive as much as not responsible.
MHG, JH, and RC each just left with their own horses, leaving MBs horses to be cared for by the mother of a working student? Wow.
Did you expect people to stay just for LKs horses?
RG could care for them. Or, once sgain MOVE THE HORSES.
Yes but then he also retracted that later saying he has no inside information.
False in one false in all
Hmm. I don’t remember that retraction. And he certainly seemed to make plenty of posts claiming he DID have inside information.
But false in one, false in all certainly applies to him in a big way.
DownYonder: hut-ho78:My original purpose in that list was trying to understand why a successful trainer/rider/business man could be so bothered by a problematic boarder.
You really are a piece of work. That “problematic boarder” had initiated a relentless campaign of mudslinging against MB in an attempt to force him to ditch MHG and restore Herself (the problematic boarder) as #1 at Hawthorne Hill. And when it became apparent that he wasn’t going to acquiesce, she escalated from insinuations to actual threats and other actions - including inferences to certain governmental agencies that MHG’s minor children were at risk there.
Sheesh. “Problematic boarder - on steroids.” (Or other stronger drugs.)
What evidence or testimony was there that LK was trying to “force” MB to ditch MHG?
Both Seeker and IM posted about it.
What was RG convicted for?
I’m sure someone will chime in with the proof.