See, if you’re familiar with guns, that statement probably makes perfect sense, while to me, it might as well be written in Mandarin.
So it seems like someone who is genuinely unfamiliar with guns would probably not know any of that stuff. Or not enough to bet their life on it, anyway.
Well, maybe when he’s done he’ll come and tell us all who he is officially. He seemed very put out that people didn’t believe he was important and was just a troll repeating already known info. He was pleased as punch when someone finally asked if he was testifying.
I am no forensic expert, but who knows of tissues slowed the velocity and upon exit they didn’t penetrate the shirt. @soloudinhere also offered up other plausible theories. At the end of the day, nobody is contesting she was shot twice or who shot her (at least in this trial - can’t say same for some posters here!) So what does it matter if there were exit wounds or holes in shirt or bullets found internally? Everyone - including the defense - agrees she was shot twice in the chest and there were lesions to prove that.
ETA: Prove not prove. I swear Siri has it out for me.
He was asked that question today, and he admitted that he was not a licensed contractor in the state of New Jersey. Or it sounded like anywhere else, for that matter.
Sorry about that. If it is true that he did not make it through basic training, he could very well not have made it to the weapons training portion. This could make his statement of not being very familiar truthful. (If he didn’t gain experience elsewhere, of course),
There was plenty of info widely available about her past antics and I’m sure her current trainer knew exactly who she was when he agreed to board her horses.