No. MB has never admitted to anything .
His attorney has argued that the defendant doesn’t remember and even if he did shoot her that it was self defense.
Why is that you believe the testimony of LK and RG when they say they can’t remember?
LK has admitted under oath that she has lied on social media
You still choose to believe conflicting victim statements and shaky forensic evidence .
I choose to believe the defendant not guilty because he is until a verdict is handed down.
He didn’t say “not guilty.” He said “not guilty by insanity and self defense. That means he said that he shot them but he was insane at the time and believed it was self defense. Those are hard to do. Alternatively, he may get an “imperfect self defense” which means the charges can be downgraded to attempted manslaughter.
The “not guilty” ship sailed already.
All he has left is “not guilty by insanity and self defense” or downgraded charges to manslaughter from “imperfect self defense.”
On the diagram, does it seem to anyone else that the spots where the 2 casings were found are kind of far apart, based on LK/RG’s testimony that the shots were one immediately after the other, “boom boom”? Or maybe one of those is from the 3rd shot allegedly fired toward the house and the “missing” one is one of the first 2?
If there were a bombshell recording of the plotters (MB, MH, RC) discussing the plan to kill LK (as I recall LK and/or IM saying) would that not have to be released to the Defense during the discovery process?
If so, what other “bombshell” could still be in the offing for tomorrow?
when your means of retreat are blocked, what then?
LK testified he blocked him from getting into his truck on one occasion (was it on another day, or did she cinveniently forget it was that day? Hmm…)
Or when you are off your feet and on the ground.
Now there’s a thought, however I think I caught a photo of the safe with the RC gun case left in the safe. It would seem to me if he was going to show them the gun so they would stop saying it was lost, do so with the case.
@Knights_Mom, when a house or apartment is on a large property like MB farm and no lease agreement exists, if a landlord is waiting for an eviction to happen, how much of the property does the tenant have a legal right to occupy especially if there is a business or another residence on the property?
I can see the house or apartment and maybe an outside area connected to the residence, but I wondered how much on a large property do they have a right to be on before it would be considered trespassing?