Kanareks left old RG out alone unrepresented. Btw it’s possible to evict one person and not the other.
And this guy doesn’t even represent RG
A corrupt and dirty police department for sure!
ED is cleaning his glasses while they are having a sidebar.
At least he will be ready if they have to get into details of transcripts. Lol.
How do you forget MB name, the name of property owner in the dispute
You probably know the opposing attorney, but if you’ve known about a day maybe 2, you probably don’t have it on the tip of your tongue.
Cross ED:
Objection overruled.
In this meeting with LK and JK day before shooting. For the first time he is told that recordings are being made of private conversations? NO.
What were you afraid (EDIT - Appraised) of for recording private conversations? NOTHING (rephrased to - nothing that I recall).
Sidebar.
Appraised of, not afraid of
He’d only met them 24-48hrs ago. I guess it wasn’t salient at the time?
Didn’t LK adamantly insist that she was completely responsible for her own finances, the huge amounts of money were hers and hers alone and did not come from her parents, and the lawyers were hers? I mean, technically the lawyer was representing her, but it’s clear that she was being financially supported by her family and all her access to legal representation was set up by her dad. There’s nothing wrong with that – if I had wealthy parents and was set for life, I’d be happy to just ride horses all day – but why the lies?
It could be her money but dad is the trustee or conservator
Ha. Thanks. I thought it was a weird question. Was he afraid of the legality and that they would be in trouble? Appraised makes much more sense.

How do you forget MB name, the name of property owner in the dispute
Mmm. He had only been on the case for a day or two, he may not have seen the name written down yet, he had a pretty shocking experience hearing gunshots over the phone. I can believe he didn’t know the name off the top of his head yet.
Speaking as someone who is not great with names, I can believe it under the circumstances.

but why the lies?
Because lying is what some people do. And they do it about EVERYTHING. Their entire existence is a weird facade…
They are having Jury leave for a 104 hearing between witness and lawyers.
What is a 104 hearing?
104 hearing. Hope they will leave the audio on (spoiler, they didn’t)
For those who don’t know, 104 is for preliminary hearings on whether a witness is qualified, privilege exists, or testimony is admissible. They may be deciding relevance if it depends on a fact or condition not proven, hard to guess but that would be where my thoughts would go on this.
Thank you!!!
Well this witness sure wasn’t prepared for what he walked into…