Ah, ok.
It still seems odd to me that this lawyer on the stand now seemed to be caught off guard by the whole subject.
6 Likes
The lawyer said he spoke to LK for “some time” before that utterance so I don’t think that makes sense. It makes more sense that she was upstairs or went upstairs, because the attorney did not mention any voices in the background or any mention of Barisone besides that.
4 Likes
Still laughing!!!
1 Like
Can Ed testify to what was communicated between him and LK prior to the statement that MB has a gun?
I meant between JK and ED
Probably not, as the conversation was between her and him in regard to the subject landlord tenant dispute (presumably) but others in the background or background noise he may have heard is not germaine to that conversation and not privileged.
If they chatted about an upcoming beach vacation, that’s not privileged either.
4 Likes
Maybe it’s just me but if I saw a guy with a gun I wouldn’t be having a conversation about it. I’d be running.
10 Likes
Yes. But he said they didn’t discuss recordings. There is definitely an audio recording about recordings….And RG was definitely there…He already testified to it.
5 Likes
Cute as a button, and appropriate length legs. 
5 Likes
Is anyone else thinking that this attorney- David - would be wise to consider his own reputation right now. These people were involved in a NASTY landlord tenant dispute, clearly doing unethical/illegal things with respect to recording devices… and they went and testified under oath that he in fact advised them regarding their recordings, and what was legal or not.
If I were him, I might want to get it on the record in some way shape or form that I did NOT advise or endorse any of their recording activities. If that was the reality of the situation.
For the record, it’s my opinion that neither this attorney nor the police ever actually told them that the recording they were doing was legal. I think LK and RG have twisted really basic conversations about one party consent laws into some weird justification for their illegal activities. And I suspect LK thought attorney client privilege would keep that particular bunch of nonsense from being discovered.
15 Likes
So this lawyer has been practicing for 40 years. Not a young guy with a career to worry about. How much is he getting paid by by JK to lie on the stand? His recount matches does not seem to match up with LK or RG particularly closely?
Hypothetically, of course.
3 Likes
Judge and witness now chatting about golf while waiting for the jury 
some moments of humanity in this mess.
6 Likes
Nothing like a little whispered golf small talk haha
3 Likes
They are talking about Tiger Woods May play at the Masters this week
1 Like
“Very strange experience, being here” says ED.
“It doesn’t have to be” says the Judge.
4 Likes
And even that one looks like he might weigh more than 20 pounds.
Very cute though!
4 Likes
I think the judge said “I can imagine.”
9 Likes
And the judge yelled at Balinkas for mentioning that it was his wife’s birthday last week!
10 Likes
It never ceases to amaze me the theories that are posted here.
7 Likes
result of 104 is that “the evidence” is not admissible. Not clear what that evidence was but it appeared to be related to the recording of that meeting.
The incredible coincidence that this lawyer calls Rob’s phone in the SAME MINUTE that MB is allegedly blasting up the driveway on his way there is too strange for words, but I suppose stranger things have happened.
I’m not alleging a conspiracy. I’m alleging an incredibly convenient coincidence, like that’s beyond coincidental.
18 Likes
