Referring to EDs testimony, LK did not run around anywhere, wasn’t up and down the steps looking for a phone…
in the call with ED She declared she’d been shot, was losing consciousness, then dropped the phone
No sounds of her beating MB after the two shots.
The injuries to MB couldn’t have happened after she was shot according to that testimony.
If her hands are covered in blood, and officer testifies she had a little but if blood in chest, but MB head was covered in blood…
Why didn’t they test blood on her hands to determine where it came from, since it clearly wasn’t from her wound?
Same. Circuit Courts typically take 12-18 months to go to trial, maybe 9 months if everything goes really smoothly. District Court is faster on average, typically within 6 months, but can stretch on much longer. The most common reasons for delay are defendants failing to appear and defense attorneys seeking continuances.
I agree with this, however, I felt ED was a bit iffy (if not argumentative) on his testimony of how long after the two shots it was, after the phone fell to the ground, before he hung up. I think Bilinkis opened the door for the case that he should have heard the 3rd shot, if there was in fact a 3rd.
I did not say it was a crime to be mentally I’ll. I just wouldn’t want to be around him and thankfully I wont need to be. If he shot someone once he could do it again.
I think it supports that the shot that hit the hpuse could have been fired from low to the ground at 14* angle upwards during a scuffle between MB and RG with LK over them, who gets hit with two accidental shots fired by who knows, as she leans over them, beating MB in the head. One of the shots to her chest is also the shot that hits the house.
There is no evidence that there was a third shot.
MB is so much taller, to get an upward angle on the shot that hit the house, wouldn’t he have to be on his knees at least??
a) She was in the hospital receiving emergency medical treatment, which is pretty good at destroying evidence (around here the police jokingly call the firefighters the Evidence Eradication Unit…their priority is life-saving, not evidence preservation).
b) How would it affect the case, since she already admitted to beating him with her phone? No test on earth could tell which blood got on her hands first, hers or his.
c) DNA testing ain’t free and many jurisdictions have testing backlogs months and months long. Each DNA test conducted in one case directly delays testing in another case, many of which need it much more than this one (think stranger rape or unsolved murder). I guess in an ideal world every piece of evidence in every case would be swabbed and tested for everything imaginable, but sadly we don’t live in that world.
Have you spent time in that neck of NJ? Almost nobody wears masks anymore. I am often the only one in a neighboring county when in stores. That said, perhaps it’s so jury can see faces and understand testimony and questioning? I noticed the thoracic surgeon was wearing one he took off when he took the stand.
She said this lawyer OR her father. So if this guy doesn’t remember wouldnt it default to the father assuming it is true? Which I’m not sure we can assume.
The key word is if. The state has to prove he did shoot someone and knew what he was doing was a crime. If the state doesn’t price this then yeah, he can say he didn’t do it.
Trials are far from perfect, but it’s currently the best system available. Vote to increase the pay for your local DAs. Or increase their budget so they can do the work that needs to be done to convict people.
If they would be helpful, I’m guessing we will hear about them from the defense. They seem to have been quite thorough on checking their records so far.