Barisone Trial Starting Monday, 3/28

[MHM]

I still try to steer clear of commenting on it, in Walmart or elsewhere.

But as I say.

The hay guy was more formally attired than LK’s attorney was for his court appearance as her star closer “bombshell” ear witness.

[eggbutt]

@hut-ho78

@eggbutt

IM was subpoenaed for the defense.

Why do you point fingers at others for getting threads shut down yet be unable to resist slipping up that you think you know who someone is and get the thread shut down?

[MHM]

@Jenerationx

Ugh… so much to catch up on. I’m only now finished with the first cop from today.

Omg. Brew a big old pot of coffee. Or five!

[Ambitious_Kate]

seems there’s more catching up to do around here, than just watching the trial. Hut-Ho needs to get with the program!

[Jenerationx]

I am not playing the sidebar drinking game though.

[MHM]

@Jenerationx

I am not playing the sidebar drinking game though.

Omg, don’t! It would kill you.

[Knights_Mom]

Alcohol poisoning!!

[iris2006]

@ohnoO

Yep! Anyone who has a farm (or anyone for that matter) should have a guy in their life like the hay guy!

So true! Before I owned a barn, I never could have conceived of how much we would come to depend on our farrier, hay guys, vets and others. We consider them friends and advisors and are so important to us. It takes a village, and they are an integral part of our team.

[KarenK]

They both did…they’re both full of

[eggbutt]

Honest question…in the future when IM/LK/RG are in meetings with anyone how will other members of the meeting know they aren’t being recorded? Meetings, phone calls, any conversation anyone will be suspect in the future!

[Sdel]

Know the enemy…if you find yourself in their presence, better be making your own recording.

[Ambitious_Kate]

Well, its all being recorded now. “I never said that!” Oh, yes you did, honey bunny. Lets have the court clerk read that back for us, shall we?

[GSDogs]

@eggbutt

Honest question…in the future when IM/LK/RG are in meetings with anyone how will other members of the meeting know they aren’t being recorded? Meetings, phone calls, any conversation anyone will be suspect in the future!

Did you mean to put those three peoples initials?

[Knights_Mom]

@Ambitious_Kate

Well, its all being recorded now. “I never said that!” Oh, yes you did, honey bunny. Lets have the court clerk read that back for us, shall we?

They can’t, the Court clerk is busy vacuuming!!!

[Ambitious_Kate]

@Knights_Mom

They can’t, the Court clerk is busy vacuuming!!!

Hardy har har har!

[MHM]

@KurPlexed

I remember now (not that it matters) that Larry Davidson was the hit man LK called the police about. Isn’t she a peach.

Yes, because obviously the hay guy is a huge threat.

[Fiesta01]

I knew it!!

[MorganSercu]

Can’t people simply state, several times throughout the conversation, “I do not consent to being recorded?”

Or maybe stick to a dry erase board with “Do Not Photograph or Record” emblazoned on it.

Would either of those be sufficient?

Just in case someone doesn’t have their phone with them at the time, it needs charging or ran out of memory (so couldn’t record them too).

[CanteringCarrot]

@MHM

@KurPlexed

I remember now (not that it matters) that Larry Davidson was the hit man LK called the police about. Isn’t she a peach.

Yes, because obviously the hay guy is a huge threat.

To be fair, she might not have known that it was the hay guy. She might’ve just saw a guy or a vehicle, but couldnt identify who it was. Plus, if you’re a bit paranoid anyway due to whatever was going on at the time/in general, then you might be inclined to call the police. Under normal circumstances one might contact their landlord (especially if they live on the property) and ask if they’re aware of anyone coming by. Or, under normal circumstances, you might not care and just assume it was someone coming to stop by/visit with the landlord or another tennant…but as we know, nothing about this situation was normal.

However, if she new it was the hay guy, and still called the police, then it is a bit odd.

[Angela_Freda]

@Ambitious_Kate

Abd if they DON’T prove he is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, then the defense doesn’t have to prove or address anything about their claim, is that right? So the defense is poking exposing the holes in the prosecution’s charges, while setting themselves up for a defense, but in the end, if there is sufficient doubt about the prosecution’s charges, the whole thing is done, no matter what the defense claims.

My correction in bold