Is anyone else thinking that the defense attorney is (maybe not so well) trying to bring out the not-so-kind side of LK on purpose? To get her air of superiority over anyone she considers an underling to come to the surface for the jury to see her attitude?
That is correct, he would be remanded to a state mental health facility. Probably for longer than a penal sentence.
The gun testimony is being specified as not character evidence, but it goes to the state of mind of the defendant. However, that doesn’t prevent the jury from hearing it.
When asked about whether she posted that she owned 2 guns, she says she put money down on the second gun at the store but never went to pick it up, so she just said she owned 2 because that would take 17 pages to explain. More back and forth about how many guns she owns and what else she posted about guns, ammo, etc.
LK repeatedly asked Bilinkas to read entire posts when he was asking her about parts of them.
After sidebar, judge gives limiting instruction to jury. Evidence about LK owning firearm is permitted to show possible effect on MB’s state of mind at time of shooting, not to attack her character.
I got the feeling that someone told her to be clear that yeah, she wrote it, but it was all just meaningless mumble jumble that gets said. She doesn’t really remember what was said, because it was all just flippant, how could anyone be threatened by my meaningless rambings?? It wasn’t meant to be threatening, it was just me blabbing away on harmless social media.
Also, this is a largely male jury who is less likely to be on social media 24/7 and less likely to fully understand just how damaging social media posts CAN be these days. So it’s a decent strategy.
So if LK thinks social media posts aren’t so serious and sees them in such a “relaxed” manner, why go all ballistic on here and take others posts so seriously? I mean, it’s just SM. Sure someone wrote it, but that doesn’t mean they meant it, it’s true, or they remember it. Right? It’s just odd to take yourself so…not seriously, but not have the same standard for others? Idk. You either take it seriously or don’t. Practice what you preach and whatnot.
I don’t know. Just some thoughts.
I do know and understand why she would get upset about some things said on here, don’t get me wrong.
I’m not sure that’s true, about men not being on SM. I also think showing her to be a crazy maker will absolutely bea trigger for some of those men and women on the jury.
That was my thought though. To show what living with/near her had to have been like and how stressful and terrifying to be around someone so disingenuous and (frankly) drama-inducing. If the jury sees the ‘real’ LK, they might be more willing to side with the insanity defense.
He’s having to relive the nightmare at HIS PROPERTY plus having to listen to a 911 call that he hadn’t heard before of him being beaten almost to death.
Speaking of the 911 call, I didn’t hear any gunshots, did any of you? So WE STILL don’t know what happened, do we?
I think it is almost impossible for those of us who have seen her posts here to guess the impression she would make on the jury members who have no previous knowledge of her.