well, you are speaking for yourself, but in this case, it is like the age-old Martial Arts question: How do you stop an Aikidoka from throwing you?
Stop attacking.
In your case, just let it go, Elsa.
What is it you want? Accept the fact that it happened.
You keep coming back to this issue, and for some reason, you seem tired of reading it.
just. scroll. past.
You are the one who keeps bringing it up disregarding all evidence in this issue.
Kind of picking the Chicken Polka from the Jukebox 20 times and complaining that is plays so often.
Well, one would have to show or participate in public activities for such logos on clothing/tack to be beneficial to a sponsor. LK does neither, does she?
There is also,in my state, a lien lis pendens. Which puts a everyone on notice that the property in question is in dispute. And causes a cloud on the title. And causes a headache to remove. In my state, one can file pretty much anything with the County Register.
For the record, all of you who are saying that the threat of a lawsuit is no big deal because you have an absolute defense: getting to that point is expensive, time consuming, annoying and stressful as hell. At my place of business, we take the threat of a lawsuit very seriously. Put the insurance carrier on notice, etc. Make sure we have all our ducks in a row, circle the wagons, whatever analogy you want.
Most folks I know would never throw around the threat of a lawsuit unless they meant it. I am not surprised KM took it seriously. It’s a frightening statement and not to be taken lightly.
And it’s one of the reasons folks get so riled up. Not a good way to have others be kindly disposed towards you.
All the corporately sponsored riders I know of always participate in some form of advertising for the corporate sponsor, whether it be clothing, saddle pads, stall curtains, giving talks, etc. Corporate logos are used as frequently as possible, just like NASCAR does for race drivers. Heck, in NASCAR, the drivers cannot seem to complete a sentence without mentioning 10 sponsors!
Unless the sponsor is not a business but an individual?
She can’t have sponsors if she intends on competing as an amateur.
But I have no idea if she intends on relinquishing her amateur status before competing again.
ETA - I believe the rules are different if she only intends on competing at CDIs in the future, as the FEI does not have the same pro/amateur status as the USEF does. CDI amatuer classes are not amateur classes in the same vein that USEF classes are. I don’t know all the intricacies involved as I’m not entering a CDI anytime in the foreseeable future.
How does an individual sponsorship work?
Are there people out there with money enough that they just toss it at someone and that someone has to do nothing in return for it?
Ok, I am going to jump in here, after lurking since the beginning of this tragedy. I am a crime junkie and dressage rider, so this is something I am very interested in, and have been following. I am going to just randomly post some thoughts.
I was aware of both LK and MB prior to this.
I had heard for years that LK was “bat #*** crazy”
I know several top riders who trained with MB and considered him to have a healthy ego, but was able to provide excellent coaching and training
my initial thought on hearing of this was that LK finally pushed someone too far
MHG certainly jumped ship and carried on with her dreams quite quickly; I’ve also heard some not so nice things about her throughout the years
-Ruth appears to still be involved with MHG
-With both MHG and LK in Florida at the same time, did they cross paths?
I would think that if someone was inclined to toss money at something with no expectation of a return, they are: a) someone’s parents or b) destined to be parted with their money very soon.