In the absence of the post you provided in which LK says she owns two guns and theyâre both Walthers, itâs conceivable that she might have posted that she owned a Ruger and the post was deleted.
However, given she posted, as you have documented, that she owned two guns, both Walthers, it does not make at sense that she would then post that she owned a Ruger.
On the other hand, people misremember posts all the time, so itâs extremely likely KM remembered a post about guns and when the gun at the crime scene was identified as a Ruger, posted that she had seen a FB post by LK saying LK owned a Ruger.
The simple confusion and misremembering would not have been that bad if KM had admitted the possibility that she was had misremembered when corrected by LK, but instead she doubled and tripled down.
KM has said she has proof. However, rather than posting the proof, she simply asserts, again and again, that the Ruger post existed.
The final consideration; KM has repeatedly expressed outrage that LK apparently threatened her with a libel action. If the post existed, and KM actually had proof that it existed, she would not have been bothered by a threat of a libel action, because, as the sage of the courtroom, she would know that the truth of the statement is bullet proof defense against libel.
Pun intended.
Thank you for finding and posting LKs post about her guns. The information that she had not brought them to NJ expressly because she understood the severity of the NJ gun laws puts the behavior of RC in stark contrast.