This is a really interesting point. One side of this debate is constantly trying to assert, without supporting evidence of any kind, several things disparaging to MB. We all witnessed that, out of nowhere and after 2.5 years of discussion, one poster recently started to push a narrative they would copy-paste with regularity:
- age-related issues: really? early/mid-50s? what a super weird/sad stretch
- divorce-related issues: amply covered by others noting many people, including LK, have experienced divorce with no major downside
- money-related issues: again, zero evidence that the divorce settlement caused money-related issues as that amount compared to his net worth is an unknown
- business-management issues: again, no evidence he wasn’t functioning perfectly well with the staff he had (all of whom we saw in court seemed lovely and competent on the stand)
Now the letter assertions are resurrected after the above narrative has been thoroughly dismantled. Again, of course, how does the saying go, without ‘back up [for their] titillating assertions’. I agree that it looks like they are hoping to throw out vague references to scandalous content and hope most people will never see the letter and discover their lies.
Nice set of folks there.
By contrast, the assertions about LK, RG, their hired guns, and even their families are all based upon information gained from the civil filing, the criminal case, the family rap sheets, and posts by LK herself. Again, quite a contrast.
And, finally, they lie. They have admitted to lying, they’ve been shown to lie, yet for several posters here that’s okay and doesn’t effect their credibility at all. That I truly do not get.
At this point I don’t believe anything they say. When seeker1 humble bragged that she was going to volunteer at a ‘food kitchen’ I didn’t believe it. I read it as just an attempted holier-than-thou put down of posters here. Now, to be honest, I’d think there might be a good chance she is volunteering, but as court-mandated public service for yet another assault charge.
Seeker1 seems not to be all that familiar with the Bible for someone who likes to reference it. Or, perhaps, she skips Ash Wednesday services as a rule? Matthew 6:18 ring a bell? Even if she does volunteer and help others, bragging about it to put others down flies in the face of:
“so that your fasting will not be noticed by people but by your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you.”
I believe 2 verses earlier the hypocrites are mentioned.
These people are as phony as they are absolutely without any moral fibre or socially redeeming qualities whatsoever.