If I didnât post that exact same screenshot on a previous thread, it was remarkably similar. But maybe he had that same look on his face quite a bit of the time during the testimony of some of his witnesses.
I donât post here often but thought this may be helpful (and Iâm also sure Iâll prob catch flack for, but whatever)
It IS possible to allow others to have their opinions. You donât have to try to change their point of view. They obviously march to the beat of a different drum and Iâm betting if everyone just stopped trying to be ârightâ the forum would easily get back on track of discussing the case.
Look at the reaction from the general population re this case (NON MB fan girls) it is almost 100% in favor of MB. What more proof do you need that you are on the correct side of this? Do you really need the 3 posters here to finally agree that youâre right? (Bc thatâs never going to happen )
Iâm not familiar with frozen so Iâm trying not to use that reference.
Admissible and illegal are two different concepts.
I donât think they were proven to be illegally made as no one was charged with a crime. Perhaps they were made illegally, but their illegality has not been established by someone being convicted, or even charged, with a crime.
Were the tapes admissible? If neither side attempted to get them admitted, weâll never know whether they were admissible or not.
The prosecution established the elements of its case without the audio recordings of an alleged murder plot. If they had been introduced, would that have affected the juryâs finding of insanity? To me it would have furthered the evidence of insanity and delusions.
Mr B tried to get portions of recordings in, and, in fact, was successful with a very small portion of one.
I donât know about you, but texts between LK, RG, and JK that say MB is âdeathly afraidâ of JK and Finish The Bastard seem different than regular ole chit chat to me.
If thatâs the case, it seems like their approach is a little counterproductive. They just keep bumping the thread back up to the top of the page, and spurring people on to dig deeper into the story to disprove their rather⊠fanciful assertions.
If theyâre just trying to get attention and stir the pot, at least theyâre accomplishing their goals a little better.
States people should quit trying to convince the other that âthey are rightâ so the civil discussion can continue. Then in the next paragraph tells someone they are âwrongâ and the other side is âright.â