Barisone Verdict Is In: Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

It would have been within the last six months, but not within the last month. I don’t remember who said it. Probably not LK. It might have been Eggbutt or tryingtogethere, but I honestly don’t remember who it was.

Um, I asked YOU for proof of your statement. You can’t declare something and not be able to back it up! You sound like a prosecution witness saying, "I don’t recall’! I have had LK’s FB pages blocked for years and I definitely can’t or won’t speak for @tryintogethere’s access to LK’s other SM accounts.

Lala was always the one running off about the letter. I wonder how YOU got it! Did she give it to you? As I recall she and IM enjoyed saying Barisone “confessed to remembering everything” in the letter, which is a blatant, absolute lie. But, of course, like always, neither of them provided proof of their comments either. Seems to be a familiar trait of Team Kanarek!

Ironically you made your post at the same time @Inigo-montoya was trolling along a few minutes ago. Coincidence?

1. It was trubandloki, not you, who asked for the posts with the information I described.
2. I certainly never said the letter was posted on LKs FB page, so I can’t imagine how your blocking her on SM is relevant.
3. I have never seen the letter; I’ve just read what’s been said about it on these threads.
4. What I remember IM saying about the letter is that Barisone said that he was housed with the “M and Ms”, but he was housed with that group because he was a VIP, not because he had mental problems. That suggests he did not consider himself insane, rather than suggesting he remembered everything.
5. Of course IM and LK did not provide proof of their statements about the letter. Neither did you. Posting it would have been a further violation of his privacy.

You seem to know when posters are logged on, even if they haven’t posted. How do you do that?

I would not have known that IM was logged on when I posted that post. So, yes, coincidence.

Right. And, proving my point, you believe everything IM had to spew. How wrong they were about everything. Back on ignore you go.

Yes, I’ve said several times that I believe what IM posts. But regarding the letter, most of the information has come from you, as the your post from Dec 21 linked by Hut Ho shows.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

Ah, so it was Eggbutt who posted one of the posts I was referring to: Eggbutt states that the recipient of the letter posted a transcribed version on SM that was private with access for about 20 people.

Nope, wasn’t me and THIS IS WHAT I DEMANDED PROOF OF.

Read the post of yours linked by Hut Ho above.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

According to LK, who had seen the letter, it had been transcribed by the daughter of his new girlfriend. I only learned about the new girlfriend when the gofundme campaign was started, but it sounds like the recipient was Lara Osborne.

Huh? How on earth would LK know any of this? Another wild assumption?

For sure Lara Osborne started the gofundme campaign, she signed her name after all. Other than that, what does she have to do with anything else, particularly on CoTH?

Again, you speculate on whiffs of smoke. As I recall, I have been raked over the coals for speculation in the past, yet it is perfectly okay for you and your buds. No mind. The truth about the Kanareks is now well known. Only the saddest of the sad are attempting to defend them.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@MHM

@CurrentlyHorseless

According to LK,

Once again, as soon as I see those words as a source of information, I just roll my eyes and don’t bother to read any further.

Just to review, LK was the one who swore under oath on the witness stand that she lies a lot on social media.

In this case, she said the letter was transcribed by the daughter of MBs “new girlfriend”. Lara Osborne has described MB as her best friend and life partner. Do you doubt that Lara Osborne was the recipient of the letter? Who cares whether Lara Osborne or her daughter transcribed the letter so that it could be posted?

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Yes, I’ve said several times that I believe what IM posts.

I know you are clearly trying to avoid answering me…

On this topic, which I mentioned in my recent post above, how do you balance the fact that IM’s posts agree with LK’s posts and LK said on the stand that she lies on social media?

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Who cares whether Lara Osborne or her daughter transcribed the letter do that it could be posted?

I think the point being made, which you appear to be ignoring on purpose, is the fact that you specifically get very annoyed if anyone on her speculates about the ID of anyone, start telling people they are breaking the rules and you will report them. So, why is it OK for you to speculate about the ID of people here?

[Knights_Mom]

Falsis in uno, falsis in omnibus!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

Ah, so it was Eggbutt who posted one of the posts I was referring to: Eggbutt states that the recipient of the letter posted a transcribed version on SM that was private with access for about 20 people.

Yes, but you specifically said Facebook in your post. Eggbutt’s post says social media. That could be a ton of things, not just Facebook. Heck, it could be here.
Where did you get Facebook from?

I assumed SM meant Facebook. Also, there may be other posts on the issue. No, I’m not looking them up.

How could she have posted it here and had access given to just 20 people?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

Yes, I’ve said several times that I believe what IM posts.

I know you are clearly trying to avoid answering me…

On this topic, which I mentioned in my recent post above, how do you balance the fact that IM’s posts agree with LK’s posts and LK said on the stand that she lies on social media?

IM is an insider. LK sometimes lies on SM, sometimes exaggerates and is overly dramatic, and sometimes tells the truth.

I believe what IM writes. You don’t have to, obviously.

[Angela_Freda]

@CurrentlyHorseless

In this case, she said the letter was transcribed by the daughter of MBs “new girlfriend”. Lara Osborne has described MB as her best friend and life partner. Do you doubt that Lara Osborne was the recipient of the letter? Who cares whether Lara Osborne or her daughter transcribed the letter do that it could be posted

Who cares if LO is the source?

[Angela_Freda]

@CurrentlyHorseless

IM is an insider. LK sometimes lies on SM, sometimes exaggerates and is overly dramatic, and sometimes tells the truth.

I believe what IM writes. You don’t have to, obviously.

IM says they are an “insider”
LK admits lying, or exaggerating, etc. How do you know which a claim of her is?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

Who cares whether Lara Osborne or her daughter transcribed the letter so that it could be posted?

I think the point being made, which you appear to be ignoring on purpose, is the fact that you specifically get very annoyed if anyone on her speculates about the ID of anyone, start telling people they are breaking the rules and you will report them. So, why is it OK for you to speculate about the ID of people here?

Lara Osborne stated, publicly, herself, in her GoFundMe campaign that MB is her best friend and life partner. She said she is the current girlfriend.

The letter has been brought up by numerous posters. It seems logical to me that the original recipient of the letter was the new girlfriend, who recently identified herself.

How is that speculating on the identity of posters on the forum?

You’re right that it is my belief that speculating on identities of posters is against forum rules.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

IM is an insider

IM says they are an insider.

@CurrentlyHorseless

I assumed SM meant Facebook.

Thank you for clarifying this.

[MHM]

I’m hearing Charlie Brown’s teacher again.

[trubandloki]

@MHM

I’m hearing Charlie Brown’s teacher again.

Am I making bad typing errors again? Darn it.

[MHM]

@trubandloki

@MHM

I’m hearing Charlie Brown’s teacher again.

Am I making bad typing errors again? Darn it.

No, my comment was not intended for you. If I replied directly to your post by mistake, I apologize.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

How could she have posted it here and had access given to just 20 people?

I am probably one of the most technologically challenged people in this discussion. Don’t ask me these things. You will get this - .
I assume some of the other social media platforms allow people to make small friend groups. Who knows if this platform has that option too.

(edit - one of those typing errors.)

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

According to LK, who had seen the letter, it had been transcribed by the daughter of his new girlfriend. I only learned about the new girlfriend when the gofundme campaign was started, but it sounds like the recipient was Lara Osborne.

Huh? How on earth would LK know any of this? Another wild assumption?

For sure Lara Osborne started the gofundme campaign, she signed her name after all. Other than that, what does she have to do with anything else, particularly on CoTH?

Again, you speculate on whiffs of smoke. As I recall, I have been raked over the coals for speculation in the past, yet it is perfectly okay for you and your buds. No mind. The truth about the Kanareks is now well known. Only the saddest of the sad are attempting to defend them.

The letter has been mentioned numerous times on these threads, especially by you. Since you’ve seen it, you’ve known all along who the recipient was.

For those of us who have not seen it, it’s been a mystery as to who the recipient was. Until the GoFundMe campaign.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

How could she have posted it here and had access given to just 20 people?

I am probably one of the most technologically challenged people in this discussion. Don’t ask me these things. You will get this - .
I assume some of the other social media platforms allow people to make small friend groups. Who knows if this platform has that option too.

(edit - one of those typing errors.)

Well, you could PM it to a group of 20 people who had accounts, but to do that the sender would probably want to know the real life identities of the people they’re sending it to, given the confidential nature of the letter.

But the short answer is still, I just assumed SM was a reference to FB.

[Angela_Freda]

I’ve seen it.
I have no idea who the recipient was.
It doesn’t really matter.

As for confidential nature… Meh, why do you think so? Especially since you haven’t seen it?
To me it read very general and could have been intended for many people to see/read.