Somebody had to have read them because they had evidentiary hearings about them. They had at least the last one the week before trial.
I think they erroneously assumed that bullets in LK would outweigh LK’s rants, which they obviously did not give proper consideration, despite 3 medical experts reporting differently.
That is wonderful!! Good on you. I sent a card to Mr Bilinkas and Mr Deininger, but not a basket. I’ll bet they were thrilled with your gift!
And @eggbutt, re: Colbert, glad to hear at least someone has contacted him. I was thinking about it too, I think I will.
between meat market and the seller’s market, perhaps a couple of hundred grand.
Not enough to make a big dent in the legal fees.
But that would not be the message send anyhow.
It would be a permamnent lien on her and whatever she may own down the road until paid up.
Looking at Daddio<
All they had to do was read and comprehend just the Stache’s report. Even he agreed the SM stuff was important. He just disagreed in the results for MB. But how many times did he say it can’t be a delusion if it’s really happening?
Lala assumed she had scrubbed them?
Too bad that over a year later she was still posting. (and many people told her to stop, because of the impending trials)
You have the right to remain silent
If only one had the ability…
The address is somewhere upthread, or just google Mr Bilinkas’ name. HIs office and address are listed. Mr Deininger is in the same building, and I’m sure they chat often.
It is in the original post in the other thread that was started on this topic.
Wow, really?
That’s a much higher number than I would have guessed. I thought a couple of them already had some age and health issues on them at that time, and that was almost three years ago.
I get the moral victory concept. I’m just wondering about the practical application of it.
And the address to send notes to MB is on the GFM page.
ETA: Mods let me know if this is not cool. Thanks.
Donations from “The Bombshell” and “K.M. Vacuumer” 
Does the prosecutor assigned to the case look at all that stuff? Or does he have underlings sift through it and determine what might be relevant to their case?
I wonder who “The Bombshell” is. (It is a rhetorical question, I’m not trying to out anyone - LOL!)
Although I can’t help but think that Mr. B. was the real Bombshell in this case! 
In my experience, it depends on the attorney. Some know everything down to the last comma. Some rely on their team.
In this case, I feel like since all of the posts, etc were so important to all 3 experts, it would have been important for the attorney to review it all as much as the experts did. Maybe he did. Maybe he just couldn’t get over Who Does This, and really believed the jury was just going to say yeah, but she got shot.
In so many ways, he kind of was handed a crap case. The police gave him nothing beyond “this guy says that guy did it.” And they failed to do simple stuff like search the other vehicles. Then you have the victims he had. And the Stache. Best he could hope for was a plea. And when that didn’t happen he gave it the old college try.
I wonder, if he had any kind of autonomy and no boss/voters to answer to, would he have started out with lesser charges? Offered a more enticing plea? He knew the case was crap. But he has a boss. Who may or may not be an elected official (I sincerely don’t know).
To this day, I still can’t even believe that part. Just unreal.
I believe at some point Schellhorn took over the case because the previous guy retired. So, he may have been stuck with something he didn’t feel he could wash his hands of.
Ahh. That’s an interesting twist.
Maybe the case was the reason the previous guy decided to retire at that point! Lol.
I know. That is such a sticking point for me.
If I could see one single piece of evidence from this case, I’d want to see the interview the police did with RG that night. I’d like to see Shooting Incident Take One from him. Plus, I’d like to look at that hand.
No. He says in the beginning of the call to 911 that he’s calling because his clients refuse to sign a document.
Rhetoric
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
