This is all speculation. What is relevant is up to the organization to decide. The facts we know are - LK assaults people in multiple forms. We know from a criminal trial, MB had proof. Why wouldnât MHG? She should have no regrets voicing her concerns and submitting the documents she felt were relevant. I think it would be her duty to report for the sake of the sport.
And yes you did remark on her not having full custody of her children before. Thatâs the entire reason for my post. But you have stated a qualifier, so I will just say I do remember.
I have been working with land developers since 1999 from the front end (civil
Engineering, environmental studies) in this area since 1999, and before that, from the rear end (paralegal for a real estate attorney) and I have seen plenty of bad checks in much larger amounts than that. Itâs a fast and furious business. Heck we have been paid with bad checks similar to that amount. Sometimes it gets worked out, sometimes not.
And I will ask: what does the ex husbands issues have to do with the matter we are discussing. Nothing!
May not look good? For LK, yes⊠not so much for anyone - and I mean anyone - filing a complaint or report about her. If she has acted out against multiple people in the equestrian world all over SM - you think that should be ignored?
If all that was submitted was true and the actual personâs own words (that they were proud of) ⊠and in the current context⊠I would feel confident about that report.
You are bending over backwards to cast aspersions on those who LK targeted with glee⊠and submitting what you obviously see as amazing detective work that you think backs up your points⊠such as the ex. He was not even mentioned by name before you happily dropped his name into the conversation to demonstrate how superb your googling skills are⊠or something like that.
USEF handles all non sexual violations of the SS code, so the file was sent to the office of USEF that handles non sexual SS violations like harassment.
Note the address on the receipt is Lexington, KY. SS is headquartered in Denver.
Does anyone have the screen capture of LK boasting about how once she sets her eyes on a target, she will take them down - not the exact words per se - but words to that effect? I am sure I did not imagine itâŠ
I donât have it, but you did not imagine it. It was about how âI never missâ and some weird tangent into claiming to have written a thesis in college and she didnât âmissâ there either or some convoluted word salad of self-flattery and puffery.
What you call my âmassive lyingâ was saying I simply changed âMHGâ to âMHG and LKâ, when in fact I changed some other phrases as well?
Did I specifically state that that was the only change I made? No, I didnât.
Itâs hardly surprising that you rest your judgement of âfundamental dishonestyâ on such a slender quibble.
Is that your only quibble with the post? Do you disagree with the main point, that itâs hypocritical to say MHGâs role may not be discussed, while LK is a continuing target for all manner of âdiscussionâ?
Re MHGs submission of the file to USEF, how would you feel about it? Would you have regrets?
If I were filing against LK not only wouldnât I have regrets but Iâd bake a cake to accompany my submission and send another via celebrity messenger. Then the big lights in Time Square would scroll it right before the New Years Eve countdown.
I had to go back and look(listen) lol. Weâre both right. Specifically she said LK had the talent and capability to be a great rider. But when Mr B asked if she considered herself a better rider, she went to generalities about putting in time and work.