Barisone Verdict Is In: Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

IM stated that SGF acknowledged that they owed RG for renovations. He didn’t say the amount. He didn’t say whether or not they felt extorted.

I think both IM and the lawyers for SGF are in a better position to know the details than anyone on this thread.

Why do you think IM’s claims are credible?

I think it is a logical move on the part of a civil lawyer for SGF who wants to get SGF extricated from the lawsuit at the lowest cost.

[eggbutt]

I naively thought once the criminal trial was over the woulda, coulda, shoulda would stop. So many of these posts are as though the trial is yet to begin.

The civil trial will be vastly different from the criminal trial and I don’t think the Kanarek mob will be pleased with all the revelations, although nothing really seems to faze these people! Deny, deflect, and blame…family motto?

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

Thanks for the positive feedback. I can get waaaayyyy too wordy on these forums. But… sometimes it’s important to just say what needs to be said

[KurPlexed]

@3PonyFarm

would think that statement would be a huge turnoff for any jurors called to service for one of his cases

Could this be used against him at future trials? I bet that would make a GREAT wrap up to a closing argument

[KurPlexed]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Also, it would extremely sensible and rational for SGF to offer to settle amicably with RG if that would make LK more likely to accept a settlement and let them out of the suit.

I can’t believe I’m even reading these words. Sick. Who does this?

[MHM]

@eggbutt

I naively thought once the criminal trial was over the woulda, coulda, shoulda would stop. So many of these posts are as though the trial is yet to begin.

The civil trial will be vastly different from the criminal trial and I don’t think the Kanarek mob will be pleased with all the revelations, although nothing really seems to faze these people! Deny, deflect, and blame…family motto?

Well, when one side did not get the result they wanted/expected/very confidently predicted in the criminal trial, they had to just ignore that result and move on to the same tactics for the upcoming civil trial. Tiresome but predictable. Again, the scroll button is a very useful tool.

If that’s the family motto, I’d hate to think what they have a picture of on the family crest.

Maybe a much more sinister take on the picture of the three versions of Spider-Man pointing at each other?

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@eggbutt

The civil trial will be vastly different from the criminal trial and I don’t think the Kanarek mob will be pleased with all the revelations, although nothing really seems to faze these people! Deny, deflect, and blame…family motto?

You forgot one thing… double down.

They are doubling down right now.

[eggbutt]

I wonder how LK’s civil suit would be effected if she is banned by USEF/SS? There is a rapidly growing number of people demanding USEF take action against Kanarek for all she has done for years against others, as well as lying under oath. It will be an interesting summer!

[eggbutt]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@eggbutt

The civil trial will be vastly different from the criminal trial and I don’t think the Kanarek mob will be pleased with all the revelations, although nothing really seems to faze these people! Deny, deflect, and blame…family motto?

You forgot one thing… double down.

They are doubling down right now.

They may have misjudged the backing MB has now from hundreds of people who want him healed and made whole again, as well as seeing Kanarek held accountable for her actions all these years.

[KurPlexed]

Thanks to you I’ve yet to have been kicked off here lol. I have so much to say but every time I try to substitute my curse words I get off track lol. You’ve been a great help representing how I feel without the vitriol i very much feel.

[KurPlexed]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

They are going to try and bury MB in legal process and make him pay and pay and pay as a defendant in this complaint, until he runs out of money. And then they will “agree” to settle.

Yep. That’s how they do it. All the while hiding her money in a trust so people can’t come against her. That’s why daddy o pays the bills. She’s untouchable. That’s how scumbags work.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

100%

It’s nasty.

I hope MBs lawyers have a strategy with respect to poppa bear himself. That’s going to be key.

[enjoytheride]

I guess I thought that refusing to leave after being served an eviction notice qualified someone as a squatter… This was established during the trial.

What kind of sane rational person doesn’t take that as a hint that they should leave? Or to argue that they’re only on step 1 of 6 or whatever of the eviction process (because I know that’s been argued by you and others) so it really wasn’t a for real serious eviction so they were totally fine staying?

You continue to argue things that have already been proven as facts, and this whole not letting up that either A. the trial didn’t go the way you wanted so let’s sue him or B. the trial totally went the way we wanted but let’s sue him anyway is petty and spiteful. Why not walk away, put it behind you, and start life fresh?

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@enjoytheride

You continue to argue things that have already been proven as facts, and this whole not letting up that either A. the trial didn’t go the way you wanted so let’s sue him or B. the trial totally went the way we wanted but let’s sue him anyway is petty and spiteful. Why not walk away, put it behind you, and start life fresh?

Because they have to win. It’s all about “winning” at this point.

[wsmoak]

@Impractical_Horsewoman

Let it never be said again we ride the boring discipline!

I was just wondering what the site traffic data looks like since the trial started and how much advertising revenue we’ve earned for COTH.

[KarenK]

I can’t even! lol

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@enjoytheride

I guess I thought that refusing to leave after being served an eviction notice qualified someone as a squatter… This was established during the trial.

What kind of sane rational person doesn’t take that as a hint that they should leave? Or to argue that they’re only on step 1 of 6 or whatever of the eviction process (because I know that’s been argued by you and others) so it really wasn’t a for real serious eviction so they were totally fine staying?

You continue to argue things that have already been proven as facts, and this whole not letting up that either A. the trial didn’t go the way you wanted so let’s sue him or B. the trial totally went the way we wanted but let’s sue him anyway is petty and spiteful. Why not walk away, put it behind you, and start life fresh?

No, a squatter is someone who was never given permission to occupy a building and just moved in.

LK had been given permission to occupy the apartment, and even without a written lease after being there 30 days was a legal tenant who needed to be given 30 days notice to vacate.

I agree that the logical thing to do would have been to leave.

I think the trial was fair and the outcome was just.

[hut-ho78]

@DownYonder

@hut-ho78

they put a lot of old biddies on the jury…

Nice (not).

That said, I am sorry for what happened to your friend.

I’m an old biddy now.

[cutter99]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@enjoytheride

I guess I thought that refusing to leave after being served an eviction notice qualified someone as a squatter… This was established during the trial.

What kind of sane rational person doesn’t take that as a hint that they should leave? Or to argue that they’re only on step 1 of 6 or whatever of the eviction process (because I know that’s been argued by you and others) so it really wasn’t a for real serious eviction so they were totally fine staying?

You continue to argue things that have already been proven as facts, and this whole not letting up that either A. the trial didn’t go the way you wanted so let’s sue him or B. the trial totally went the way we wanted but let’s sue him anyway is petty and spiteful. Why not walk away, put it behind you, and start life fresh?

No, a squatter is someone who was never given permission to occupy a building and just moved in.

LK had been given permission to occupy the apartment, and even without a written lease after being there 30 days was a legal tenant who needed to be given 30 days notice to vacate.

I agree that the logical thing to do would have been to leave.

I think the trial was fair and the outcome was just.

Wrong again.

Definition of SQUATTER

[KurPlexed]

Is there?

Can someone, close to MB, pls set up a go fund me or similar so we can help him thru this nightmare? We (collectively) have never been more united and I’d hate for the (can’t think of the right word) to die down.

Also, can someone be more specific about how to report to SS? It seems to me a united front would be better received then individual reports.

Sorry, one more thing. Can someone reach out to Mr. Bs office and get solid info on how we can send support directly to MB? I don’t feel comfortable sending anything to a STATE psych ward.