Like the names Zuckerburg, Bezos and Musk aren’t regularly held up as the pinnacle of successful? Yes, being positive/kind/helping others is definitely the hallmark of successful instead of ruthlessness as the unfortunate rule
I’m disinclined to further ponder the logic of someone who finds FitzE problematic and has called out FitzE publicly but has no such issues with, or condemnation for, the battery acid comments and behavior of LK.
If the word ABSURD needed an example, this would be it.
You know what they say about getting involved in land wars in Asia … another classic blunder is this: never engage with the persecution fantasy of a stranger on the internet.
This does make a lot of sense. If the K family are prevented from trashing MHG, a couple posters as proxies suddenly focusing hard on MHG explains from whence that recent drumbeat arose.
Still looking at behavior. The drug related questions on direct were interesting. I saw very extended tells before starting her testimony about what kind of drugs she used, that went away when talking about the heroin, again the extended tells before saying that was mostly it, and they again receded about pot.
When asked about how that started there were again the tells sprinkled throughout the statement. The question of if she was sober now didn’t provide a visual.
When asked about using on MB’s farm, she does close her eyes and shake her head no, but it’s a negative gesture to go along with a negative response.
When asked about taking drugs to maintain her sobriety she closes her eyes and again nods her head yes. When asked what medications she uses she again does the extended face touching and then says that one drug she takes is Suboxone. And it’s followed up by asking if she goes to a psychiatrist or addiction specialist.
I generally found the drug portion generally compelling, behavior wise, when talking about sobriety. The only real hitch was the big tell about only taking one drug and maybe the reasons why she started in the first place.
I started wondering about that the other day with all the instance that there’s no connection between the K family and a couple posters here. I thought, gawd, imagine of all the people out there who could use some support for various things, this is who they chose? This is their big white knight operation?
I mean, the woman just openly mocked a man for being in a wheelchair gleefully noting that he could walk again or drive - like hahahaha, pwned!
That’s the person they will spend this much time defending.
Honestly, of all the people you could chose…the mind reels.
I highly doubt that conversations between MB & MHG that were recorded ILLEGALLY, are going to be admissible and/or appreciated by USEF. Honestly … are listening devices hidden by creepy disgruntled clients on bedside tables now going to be fair game too?
It’s ridiculous, and it’s just going to get worse for the Kanareks all around. Their daughter is going to be shown even further for all she truly is, and rather than anyone having sympathy for the rest of her family, they’re going to be shunned too, because they just couldn’t help coming on here making fools of themselves excusing inexcusable conduct from their FORTY SOMETHING year old daughter/sister/sister-in-law.
Don’t leave now though, family K … my utter astonishment at how crazily low into the hole you’re willing to go (for WHAT??) is kind of fun.
You know I just realized that Seeker1 says they don’t support or agree with LKs actions BUT S1 did say they themselves personally transcribed recordings LK made. That sure seems like being in agreement, collusion and acting as an active participant in LKs actions.