Who in the world does this sort of thing and thinks it is normal, appropriate or called for? That is seriously warped thinking and I doubt it started after the age of majority.
Obviously the eviction notice was not the only issue. Iāve been saying that if it were just logistics about moving the horses, perhaps she might have moved.
Iāve been saying that two sloppy, complex financial deals may well have complicated an otherwise simple exit.
If he was going to evict her, he would need to serve notice (which he apparently did on Aug 6), then proceed with the legal eviction process. Merely taking the first step in the eviction process is not enough.
Iāve said the opposite of āthe shooting was MBās only solutionā. Iāve state repeatedly that both sides could have unilaterally taken actions to de escalate, but both sides instead chose to escalate.
I will say that the History Channel has a series called The Food That Built America, and itās sort of fascinating to see the origin of all these things that we take for granted, and how some of them were such complete flukes at the start. And also the variations and twists and turns between companies that were competing with similar products.
For example, Popsicles were invented when some kid left his drink out overnight on his porch with a straw or something still in it, and when he came out and saw it in the morning, it had frozen.
And others have told you several times that engaging the lawyers to work out a future situation and arrange her departure would be de-escalating but you seem to insist that doing so was escalating.
Please explain, in 1st grade terms, what you think the prosecutor or judge will care about anything posted on an anonymous public forum!!! The prosecutor is out of it now. He lost the case. The judge is only involved by officiating at the next hearing. I can guarantee you Safe Sport wonāt even respond to you!! What have you been smoking? Dang!! This is probably one of the most outrageous, ridiculous posts Iāve EVER read on these forums in all these years.
Thatās her versionā¦.and sheās the oath sworn liar on SM. MBās version is a little differentā¦and Iām pretty sure Mr. B hinted at how he was threatened during the trial.
Sigh. I know this is pointless. IMHO, the court decided that he was not criminally responsible for having shot her due to insanity, but did not specifically rule that āhe was driven there by someone on purposeā.
He was vulnerable. He had many stressors (including but not limited to LK and RG). It appears some of his āfriendsā egged on his combative stance rather than talking him off the ledge.
Youāre right, they were in FL winter 2018, not living at his facility, living in a rental. JH training the two horses. Two. $2500 per horse for board and train with JH.
(And I donāt think I can watch RG any more)
Edit to add, at this point in RGās testimony, he states they had limited contact with Michael Barisone. MB would come check on things every once in a while, and maybe give a pointer.
So no, not a year long landlord-tenant, close client relationship until they went back to NJ spring of 2019.
Or holding your hand to your head in the shape of a gun, pulling the ātriggerā, and saying something along the lines of, āWeāre going to get you.ā
And Iām Italian, and Iām not offended by the reference to organized crime. And not just because my uncle was a numbers runner for a short time in the 1960āsā¦
AND I just mailed my cards to Mr Bilinkas this afternoon. (Iām such a rebel!)
OK, enlighten me. How did she supposedly threaten him, beyond saying āIāll only train with you in NJ if you throw in housing like last yearā. Which, BTW, is called ānegotiatingā.
@Fat_Dinah, I am sincerely curious why you think that Bilinkas receiving cards and letters directed to MB is something the court will care about.
You clearly feel strongly about it, but I can not guess what you see as wrong about it.
Another lawyer here has said it is pretty common thing, for a lawyerās office to receive cards for their client.
why are you so hung up with these veiled references to a divorce that literally nobody except you has described as stressful or contested? Because he had to pay a settlement? Youāve invented all these stressors, particularly financial, and keep bringing them up - yet nobody but you has mentioned anything about them.
Creating a scenario and then responding to it, a la the āmovie in my head,ā wellā¦it doesnāt add credibility to your statements.
What you might be stressed by might be a complete nonfactor for someone else. The only stressor thereās any legitimate proof of is a client/tenant behaving badly.