Buck Brannaman photo - Thoughts??

Lord have mercy… just scanned through the first few comments on FB. What planet are these people coming from??

“Watched his movie. Watched him turn his back on that stud that got put down and then swing at him when he approached. The colt was trying to be nice but Buck was more worried about the camera so destroyed an opportunity to save that colt. In just one second, and it NEVER should have happened.”

The colt was trying to be NICE?? I guess we didn’t watch the same movie. I saw a rank, spoiled and possibly deranged aggressive young colt charging fencelines and savaging people.

Weird idea of ‘nice’.

Those people are complete idiots. Certifiable.

They remind me of a gal who approached me at a vet’s office. I had my horses unloaded and tied to the trailer, waiting to have some Coggins pulled. She advised me that if my horses loved me, I wouldn’t need fences to contain them, or ropes to hold them. All while restraining her rather unhappy dog…on a leash.

[QUOTE=Appsolute;8160972]
Its a “colt starting clinic” - I am just not a fan of hauling green youngsters to a strange place - then attempting to introduce tack, and start them under saddle in a matter or hours, or days.

Buck’s clinics advertise that the “Colt Starting Clinic” is:

“A class for young horses that may or may not have been handled or worked with” and within 4 days (a few sessions) the horse will be undersaddle and working in a snaffle. So, “break a horse in 8 hours”? Maybe they spend that much time? And if they did 2 hours day - again, against the way I do things, short daily sessions - just not possible at a “colt starting clinic” - unless the clinic went on for 60 days!

To me - that is SUPER rushed. I just don’t push things that fast. And like I said, I get ZERO fireworks. No bucking undersaddle, no stress - just a half hour a day, slow and steady.

Makes for quiet, confident horses - I just have NO need to rush things and get a horse going in a few sessions.

But - I also had great mentors growing up - learned by working side by side, hours and hours a day, 7 days a week - clinics have their uses, but all too often most of the participants do not have good mentor-ship at home - and try to “rush” their education - just like they want to rush the starting process.

And I handle my youngsters - they aren’t ever left to be “wild” - so I am coming from that point of view.

And I agree with others - I don’t know if I “blame” Buck and these other trainers that much. I have a feeling things would be pretty different if they were just working horses at home - and not on these $$$ clinic circuits, and producing all these “DVDs” and whatnot. I bristle at these “celebrity trainers”.

Nope - out on 50 acres until they are about 5. I have had to walk down a couple, but just once. Still have never had to lasso one.

And I am not saying that a lasso is abuse - I just have never had to use one. Maybe its an “english” riding thing? Most tack rooms I know do not have a lasso in them, and I can’t say my trainers were good at throwing a rope - I always associated roping with cattle.

Do the europeans lasso their young stock?[/QUOTE]

I’m not trying to nitpick, but YOUR horses are all brought along slowly and are ready and willing because they have been handled and exposed. Some of the horses that people bring to these clinics are rounded up, loaded in a stock trailer through a chute and voila, clinic time. Is that ideal? NO! Is that what Buck Brannaman wants people to bring him? I seriously doubt it! Does he work with these previously unhandled horses the best he can? YES, I think he does!

I’ve seen European starting with FIREWORKS and some without. Start enough horses and one will not go easily, it’s just the way of it. For the 100 saintly, easy going horses there is one that is going to be HARD. It might not need to be roped, but that doesn’t mean things won’t get a little wild.

As to working under saddle in a snaffle…how long does it take you to get on a young horse and have it move forward? I don’t think 4 days is rushed at all? They are not starting horses with a longline and then ground driving, they are literally just letting them move freely and accept a rider - no collection, no frame, just follow face and move their feet. They get the forward and accepting a rider and then the rest comes later, which is different from the traditional European model, but no less effective (in my opinion). I have horses that have been started both ways. They are very different approaches, but when you look at the fundamentals both achieve the same results with different methods.

[QUOTE=BarbaricYawp;8161213]
Lord have mercy… just scanned through the first few comments on FB. What planet are these people coming from??

“Watched his movie. Watched him turn his back on that stud that got put down and then swing at him when he approached. The colt was trying to be nice but Buck was more worried about the camera so destroyed an opportunity to save that colt. In just one second, and it NEVER should have happened.”

The colt was trying to be NICE?? I guess we didn’t watch the same movie. I saw a rank, spoiled and possibly deranged aggressive young colt charging fencelines and savaging people.

Weird idea of ‘nice’.[/QUOTE]

I was thinking the same thing. But I haven’t seen the movie only the YouTube trailer of the spoiled colt who is trying to hurt people so I thought maybe it was another part of the movie.

I’m ambivalent on the whole Buck thing, but put an english saddle, side reins, and snaffle on that horse and put a woman in boots and breeches on the end of the rope instead of a cowboy on a horse, and…well you’d have ass crack of dawn at the first day of horse shows all across the country and no one would think it a big deal. Horse act up on the line, it happens. Is it any worse, on principle, to have that line going to a lariat around the neck than to a bit in the mouth? I don’t think so.

There are usually two kinds of horses at those kinds of clinics. People into the buckaroo thing that want guidance to further their riding, and people with problem horses that they can’t or won’t get regular training help with. I suspect this horse falls into the latter category.

[QUOTE=roseymare;8161624]
I was thinking the same thing. But I haven’t seen the movie only the YouTube trailer of the spoiled colt who is trying to hurt people so I thought maybe it was another part of the movie.[/QUOTE]

The colt was miserable and dangerous. Not once did he engage normally.

[QUOTE=PeanutButterPony;8161663]
The colt was miserable and dangerous. Not once did he engage normally.[/QUOTE]

I agree he never engages normally in the youtube clip but I thought maybe there was another one in the movie because I can’t fathom seeing that colt for anything other than what he was but I guess his owner did so why should I be surprised that people watching might as well.

[QUOTE=JGHIRETIRE;8160986]
I can’t find it in the conversation on Facebook now but someone was talking about the horses back going to sleep right where we ride?? Going on and on about how awful it is to ride a horse. Wondering where she got that kind of information. I have never heard much about that before. As long as it is a healthy horse.[/QUOTE]

Actually, I’ve hear that, too, but I can’t remember where . . . .

I perused the site of the group that posted. Anti bits, anti any training with “force”. The talk about showing a horse how to hold his head with treats and scratches.
That is fine for trick training bit anything else?

Are absolute positive training methods overtaking the world?
I am not anti positive methods but these “do not ever make an animal do something they might not like” methods I don’t see as very viable for making well adjusted horses or pets for that matter.

[QUOTE=roseymare;8161965]
these “do not ever make an animal do something they might not like” methods I don’t see as very viable for making well adjusted horses…[/QUOTE]

Sounds like an excellent recipe for death or dismemberment.

Fyi - the Seven Clinics DVd disk 2, chapter ‘on firming up’ is where Buck himself explains how and why he gets firm with a spoiled horse, and hos he goes back to soft ASAP as part of training by release. Search for that on Youtube, my network won’t let me youtube right now. And he states that is own colts rarely need such because he does start them slow, frequent, and correct, and that it’s the poorly handled horses brought to clinics for fixing that need unusual handling.

I also re Ll but haven’t found where he snips at a clinic group that they should have been handling their colts more correctly all along, not waiting for a starting clinic to jam it in four days. But it’s four days or never at all for many ammys, so better he do clinics than not.

I agree he has an arrogant streak. His training helps the horses enough, and,is horse focused enough, that I can put up with it though I’m no worshipper.

[QUOTE=Cindyg;8160342]
I have observed that Buck is not to be questioned, certainly not criticized.[/QUOTE]

I think there’s a reason for that. Brannaman has spent a lifetime earning that sort of respect and support. It doesn’t come easily.

He has his methods, honed over the years. That’s his deal, and it’s how he trains, and that is what the people go to the clinics for. I could very much see how he doesn’t care to be questioned or criticized – you know what you are getting. If you don’t like his methods, train with someone else.

He’s pretty transparent. I think most horse trainers that have been there done that are arrogant, to some degree. Does anyone actually question or criticize George Morris (to his face, anyway)?

I believe Buck has the horse’s best interests in mind, and I also believe he loves horses. I think we do horses a dis-service by assuming all of them are kind and gentle and want to please – they all have personalities and issues. Not every horse takes well to being obedient under saddle. My point is, if you love horses, you recognize they aren’t all the same and one size doesn’t fit all. Some come around, and some are difficult rides all their lives, for whatever reason. They are all individuals. Certainly not all of them would respond to only treats and petting to get them to be a safe citizen for the average rider!

In my experience most will not become solid citizens if only exposed to treats and petting.
They need boundaries. That is difficult if you only use treats and petting.

I should edit to say, the absense of a stimulus is in essence negative reinforcement. If my horse is obnoxious about wanting a treat and I ignore his behavior and walk away from him that is a negative. Horses actions did not elicit response. If I continue to pet or praise while horse is expecting a treat I have solidified that obnoxious behavior with positive reinforcement.
I don’t understand why negative reinforcement is seen as always about “pain” to those who push this only positive philosophy. I suspect it is taken out of context and they are playing on people’s emotions of not hurting the pretty pony?

The original page with the pictures was from 2012. The woman that took them was a photographer and had her horse at the clinic. She made no comment about the lasso horse. She just posted a lot of really nice pics.
She was very positive about her experience.
I’m always glad I don’t have hidden cameras at my barn. All my horses are really nice but trust me, they too can have a bone headed moment. I’d hate to have someone judging a picture of me and not knowing the situation.

[QUOTE=HorsesinHaiti;8162041]
…And he states that is own colts rarely need such because he does start them slow, frequent, and correct, and that it’s the poorly handled horses brought to clinics for fixing that need unusual handling.

I also re Ll but haven’t found where he snips at a clinic group that they should have been handling their colts more correctly all along, not waiting for a starting clinic to jam it in four days. But it’s four days or never at all for many ammys, so better he do clinics than not.[/QUOTE]

This might be food for a different thread.

But does your argument work? I.e. The ammy who has screwed up a young horse, has no help and brings it to a Brannaman colt starting clinic gets a “not normally how I do it, but I only have 4 days, so here’s that version….” education…. that is still better than nothing, so Brannaman’s clinics are valuable, even if the clinic-ness of the teaching distorts the process of the way he’s actually start a colt.

I’m not sure that clinic is worth having because it doesn’t accurately represent a great process for starting colts. And I’m not sure someone who can’t or won’t spend the time and money until it’s a lot of it for one weekend with a famous clinician is going to really go start their colt the long, slow, quiet way Brannaman could describe…. but not show them in four days.

Has any of you guys ever seen an ammy reformed and really sent on a new track of training after Brannaman comes to town? Does that produce new clientele for local Brannaman-esque trainers? Do these ammies go home and start putting in an honest 5-days a week program on their horses and get them sophisticated, soft and rideable?

[QUOTE=Pocket Pony;8161724]
Actually, I’ve hear that, too, but I can’t remember where . . . .[/QUOTE]

FOUND IT!!!

It is from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQUMAJCh1fA

At about 27 minutes in they talk about how after about 12-15 minutes a horse’s back goes numb…

[QUOTE=mvp;8162093]

Has any of you guys ever seen an ammy reformed and really sent on a new track of training after Brannaman comes to town? Does that produce new clientele for local Brannaman-esque trainers? Do these ammies go home and start putting in an honest 5-days a week program on their horses and get them sophisticated, soft and rideable?[/QUOTE]

Sure I have, and I was one of them for a while. Mac was not an easy horse and after a really bad getting-bucked-off-incident, I had to find another way that my other trainers couldn’t (or wouldn’t) help me with. If I had a local BB-type of person to work with that I felt offered me what I wanted, then I surely would have gone to them for some training help. As it was, there were a couple I found but I didn’t like their style or approach or methodologies, so I worked on my own until the next year’s clinic. But I was very diligent, I work well independently, keep up a regular program with my horses, and kept up my training with the goal of making him soft and rideable. I also know other ladies whom I met at the clinic who were also very serious about continuing with what they learned.

That’s great to hear, Pocket Pony!

I’m sure you’re the kind of student a clinician would like. It’s always gratifying to see people take instruction to heart and improve on their own.

Oh, and I think you are in the part of the country that has many good horsemen who know how to make up a bridle horse.

Working with them is on my bucket list while I’m also here in Oregon. It’s an opportunity not to be missed as you’d have a harder time getting that in, say, Virginia. Learning to make up a bridle horse is a very long line-item on that list, and I have other things on the bucket list, too!

IME, however, this can’t be done without someone really watching me with a horse. I know you can get Brannaman to do that for you a bit in a clinic-- if the timing is right and your demeanor is right. But I have found that I need help more frequently than once or twice a year. Otherwise, I spend a long time going too far in the direction I was sent last, just because I didn’t know how to choose the next thing. Hope that makes sense. So I think Brannaman can be a great “shot in the arm”-- and I’ll go audit his clinic this year for hours and hours. But there’s no substitute for regular local help if you want to make this already-long process take less time with your first bridle horse.