What a weird speculation to make about a situation you very apparently know nothing about. It has zero to do with that and makes one party out to be for revenge. You’re not helping. The divorce is final. Custody is set and the settlement is final.
Have you ever thought there could be a hell of a lot more to a situation that you could even fathom?
This whole thread is weird speculation to be fair.
So are you saying the above family court case is for something other than the divorce?
This is the entire docket and it does not appear to show that it is finalized and it sure looks like a divorce.
“Daaaddy. She’s touuuuuuuching me!”
We do know that Buck was held in custody for 36 hours. That’s a fact.
Even better, when they hold their hand 2 inches in front of your face:
“Not touching, can’t get mad. Not touching, can’t get mad!”
…siblings are the worst. I’ll be sure to remind my sister this Christmas.
(As to the rest of this thread, I’ve got nothing. I feel terrible for everyone involved, and worse that it’s all over the internet and subject to wild speculation).
“Daaaaddy. She’s loooooooking at me.”
And some of y’all wonder why folks don’t want everything out there for all the world to see.
Unless you’re in this family, it’s none of anyone’s business.
Ha ha that was my brother 
Wow.
Please reference my earlier post in this thread, bolding added.
You have stated that the divorce is final, and that custody and the settlement are final.
Cool. That’s new information. Though Trubandloki’s post seems to indicate that there’s an ongoing legal dispute.
But my commenting that perhaps what’s going on with an estranged couple with small children after divorce is likely related to visitation, custody or support isn’t exactly a huge leap. And revenge was nowhere in my post or my thoughts. Figuring our co-parenting is hard. Especially when the parents are nursing wounds from the divorce.
Clearly you know the principals in this case and you are emotionally invested, and that must be really awful. And apparently you are not at liberty to share what you know. Also difficult.
But it doesn’t really serve your cause to attack other posters who are trying to discuss what little information is available.
I am absolutely SURE that there’s more to this situation that I know, because I know next to nothing. However, implying that it’s beyond my ability to “fathom” is a little over the top. You don’t know me or my life experience, just like I don’t know the Davidson’s, so you have no idea what I am capable of “fathoming.”
Just a note - custody and financial arrangements for the support and custody of minor children are never “final” either party can move to modify either order for any of a number of reasons.
Yep. In my state, even if a parent loses or relinquishes parental rights, they can petition for reinstatement. Just ask my friend, whose abusive ex surfaced like a zombie 7 years after abandoning his family.
What? Driving on a suspended license is not in the least relevant
Stating again here that none of know exactly what happened that led to this unfortunate situation.
However, one thing I do know, is that the divorce is not final. There may be a temporary arrangement on custody. But if you look at the docket entries you will see that an Amended Petition for DOM (dissolution of marriage) was filed on 10/9/23.
And there has been active motion practice from then until 11/7.
So, it’s stated all over again with the Amended Petition - that basically takes it back to the beginning.
(Here ends Lawyer’s corner)
I’m so very sad for their kids most of all. The reason I don’t practice family law is I couldn’t stand to see the kids having to live in a situation when the parents can’t get out of their own way and put them first.
Safe Sport doesn’t suspend people who are arrested for misdemeanors that do not involve students or others in their capacity as a trainer or employer.
It is extraordinary (IMO) that people still don’t understand what Safe Sport is or does.
Didn’t someone get suspended for child pornography charges?
That would be a felony of a sexual nature where children are involved. This is not.
I’ve read the SafeSport code, does it not state that any criminal charges, dispositions, or warrants are a violation?
Right, but, for those of us outside the US just following along, my question was to this point you made above: it does seem you can be sanctioned by SafeSport for something that does not involve people in their capacities as trainer or employer. That’s what I’m asking.
Anything that Safesport deems inappropriate can get you suspended or banned. Being a trainer or employer means they will give more weight to whatever charges they see, but if you’re not a trainer or employer, they can and will sanction you for anything they deem actionable and inappropriate, such as a bunch of alcohol-related charges, repeated reckless driving, repetitive petty theft or property destruction, assault charges, or anything that makes you look bad in their eyes and shows a disregard for common laws or public safety.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
