I’ve seen several posters here reference the fact that she lost her temper or got to this point or was taking out her frustrations on the horse.
I saw something very different. She is so cool and casual in her violence against that horse that it strikes me as far more likely that this was business as usual, not a crime of passion, if you will.
Watching her hit that horse repeatedly in the absence of other signs of anger (raised voice, red in the face, spectators reacting with laughter and chatting, not silence while someone has temper tantrum, ect.) was the most chilling part of it, for me.
I’ll add my voice to those saying they’ve never seen anything like this in their equestrian experience.
I don’t get the point of saying, ‘I wonder how many of you [us little people I guess?] have ever been at an upper level barn’. So what? Why should this change our genuine reactions to abuse? If it changes yours b/c you are in BNT/upper-level land than that’s a you problem, not those of us who are horrified and for whom this behaviour has not been normalised.
It’s like me scoffing, ‘You all act like you’ve never eaten three meals in one day at Michelin-starred restaurants
’ just b/c I live in one of the food capitals of the world and even my local pizzeria has a Michelin star.
Upper level is a place few people get to. If those of us below that level (or nowhere even near it) don’t and haven’t seen this
and find it horrific, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing. It is OUR reaction that should be normalised, not the acceptance of those among us who have been in the rarified upper-level facilities and see it day in/day out at every single facility they’ve been to.
It’s not at all farcical to either recoil in horror or state factually that we’ve never been in the presence of such behaviour for those of us among the great unwashed outside the upper-level barn bubble.