I never said or intimated that you did - as my grandmother used to say, “the guilty flee when none pursue.”
That question was obviously (or so I thought) a rebuke to you for handslapping me for defending myself FROM those things, and doing it in what you deem a less-than-perfect way. IOW - just pointing out that you seem to be holding to me to a different standard when I get rude and insulting in RESPONSE to those who are being the WORST kind of rude of insulting, ie liars and slanderers, while taking issue with them not at all.
It’s obvious, and this is boring. I will not explain it to you again.
As for Juliet, I have absolutely zero first hand knowledge of what tag was on her halter; I was too busy trying to coordinate the trailer and the manpower to come and get her to stop and look.
I do know that the owner received NO summonses for wrongdoing concerning the incident.
I also know that changing a tag is useless, as anyone who is tasked with checking numbers must match the tag to the hoof number.
I also know that the DoH has made many, many mistakes in our long history with them.
Something else I know - that regardless of what happened with Juliet, it is not an indication of anything that goes on at large in our industry, and that anyone who says otherwise is either seizing on it to have a reason not to support, or is part of the larger effort which works against us.
We do not, as a whole, change tags, change hoof numbers, or double-shift horses; our horses have an extraordinarily low incidence of colic compared with other horse populations, due mainly (according to Dr. Lowe of Cornell University) to the fact that our horses work 9 hours a day, everyday, with their work and feed routines barely varying. Whatever happened with Juliet - even if you choose to believe the worst without any supporting evidence - it is not indicative of the industry at large. Believe it, or don’t.
Now, c&p a snippet of this post and give me a snarky answer, have at it. Or don’t.