And here we go - round and round again. What is it that you find so astounding? That there are sensitivities that have gone through generations? Is that not called hereditary, genetic, “history” of a family?
No, not astounding that there can be a genetic gene pool more sensitive to something than others will be. However…(you knew there’d be a however, didn’t you? ;)) are you saying your family is genetically sensitive to that many different allopathic medicines? That’s statistically astounding.
Also, the animals; your family pets and client’s pets were also sharing a same genetic family to cause the similar/same reactions? Those above statistics just became even more astoundingly rare.
Add in lastly that seemingly only those with such strong opposition to alllopathic or at least such a strong belief in homeopathic and/or herbals seems to run into multiples of these gene pools of sensitivity.
Now we’re talking statistics of such rarity that it’s beyond astounding.
Statisically speaking (or use “odds” or “coincidence” or whatever) there’s a much much much higher probability of the adverse reactions being hysteria or belief caused than the actuality of finding so many reactions to so many different vectors in so many different gene (and specie) pools in one concentrated area.
There’s an immeasurably higher chance for the unicorns galloping causing that sound. :winkgrin:
Well, perhaps so, perhaps not. Perhaps because of your biased thinking you’ve not put two and two together ??
As stated previously…no, it’s ridiculously unlikely that all of my rather large family’s numerous pets over the decades have been genetically identical in resisting reactions to allopathic medicine. Especially considering the species barriers there too.
I see you fail to keep up with medical findings and reports on herbs and such. Look it up – you’ll be surprised, I’m sure. Do you not realize that over half of our prescription drugs are derived from herbs and plants? Short answer - yes. There are plenty of ‘provings’.
You’re failing in what you see also. 
Yes, allopathic medicine often has plant matter. In tested amounts and strengths. Buying them online, growing them yourself, whatever…is not going to be the same tested amounts and strengths now, will it? 
And nope, I wasn’t surprised when it was looked up either.
It may surpise you that I am not anti-herbal at all. And I’m pro-integrated medicines. (using herbal/natural and allopathis together UNDER licensed pros in tested amounts and supplies)
I am anti-homeopathic in the sense that diluting something to 1 in one billion whatever of something is ridiculous to think of as a cure for anything. And I’m very anti-give herbal medical advice out on the web or prescribing medical herbs to others (whether or not you use quotes around the word prescribe) when one is NOT licensed to do so. The herbals prescribed might not require licensing, but the diagnosing and suggestion of them as cures DOES. Especially when the experience used is mainly anecdotal.
Internal testing for how long? The time of testing is becoming shorter and shorter. Gardasil was not even fully tested before the vaccine became ‘mandatory’. What about Vioxx? And Premarin? etc. etc.
As has been stated ad nauseum, nothing is 100%.
According to records over 200 years the CORRECT homeopathic remedy has never failed to ‘cure’ an individual that was not in a terminal state to begin with. If a remedy fails to cure its simply because the wrong remedy was administered. Homeopathy is individualized according to each individual ‘patient’. And yes, Homeopathics is 100% safe for animals, humans, birds, fish - any age, any size etc. etc. It is not based on ‘chemicals’ – it is not ‘anti-anything’ (as in anti-biotics, anti-bacterial etc. …) it is based on dynamic energy balance of the vital force/immune system within one’s own individual body.
Ahhh, so it’s LUCK?
A rather convenient statistic there.
It’s 100% effective if you picked the right one!
And if you didn’t pick the wrong one often enough that the patient became terminal…well that’s not anybody’s fault! It was bad luck in your choices!
So it’s a 100% success rate! (if you chose/guessed right the first few times before you dropped dead that is)
Homeopathy is 100% safe because it’s 100% benign. 1/1,000,000,000 of anything is 100% safe. It’s not 100% (or even 1%) effective, but it’s nont detrimental either.
And since when is the immune system a Vital Force? It’s a system within the body. Complete with concrete stuff like blood cells, etc. The Force is something from LOTR movies or Star Wars. Or else a faith based issue…which would mean that those who do not share the same faith or else do not have any faith are not able to be cured of anything homeopathically?
I’m not assuming anything. There have been lots of ‘failures’ until that correct remedy is found. There are case histories galore and I have an extensive library here at home in yes, printed materials!
So the word failures is in quotes now. I guess it can’t be called a quoteless Failure because it isn’t a failure when a patient dies because the right remedy wasn’t chosen in time. It’s never that the remedies don’t actually work…it’s the timing/choice issue.
Can’t ruin that 100% success/never harms/perfectly safe faux ‘statistic’ with admitting to actual failures.
Sucks for the patient…sorry buddy, we’re out of guesses and you’re out of time. But thank goodness the homeopathy did absolutely no harm!
Tell the dead patient that it’s not harmful to remain untreated successfully or undiagnosed while someone tries to contact your “force” to find out just which plant juice you need.
Because in order to correctly practice homeopathy it is essential to keep records. Doctors who practice Homeopathy are required to keep them. Homeopaths who are up front and ‘honest’ homeopaths keep records. On the flip side, how can one be sure of the ‘validity’ of allopathic records? Even laboratory findings? Is there anything that is 100% sure?
Uless the homeopath is taking blood tests and other testing before, during and after the issue…the records of “patient seemed to have ____, we treated with ____ and patient appears to _____” means diddly squat. Some may hate or distrust science, but it’s still required for tracking accurate records.
Is allopathic 100% sure. No, absolutely not. Is it a hella lot more sure than “I observed this” without all the testing to back it up on multiple peer reviewed cases? Most definitely.
Well, if your pets and children are vaccinated then you shouldn’t have anything to worry about – that’s why people vaccinate, right?
No, and it only goes to show the lack of a very basic simple understanding of diseases. Which is actually frightening given the advice you hand out with such a lack of the basics.
Many diseases are considered “extinct” or almost extinct in this area due 100% to the vaccinations being used so predominantly over so many decades.
When people travel to other areas and pick up diseases we haven’t had here in decades or longer…the chance of it being the exact same version of that disease is very very low. Our disease version were wiped out. Not the entire planet’s versions or all the newer mutated versions of the same diseases.
So no, my family and pets being vaccinated against our globally local diseases is not going to save their lives if some moron flower believer travels or comes in contact with someone who travelled and spreads something different that we were not vaccinated specifically against.
Ever hear of people getting different new adult vaccines if they’re travelling to certain areas? As a matter of fact you can NOT get into certain countries without new vaccines for diseases never encountered here. We’re not vaccinated against dengue fever but we can’t go anywhere tropical without that vaccine. And it’s not to keep the natives of that area from catching it from us, it’s to keep the rest of this country from catching it from us when we return. (and because we have zero natural immunity to it either as the natives of those areas do. But if we catch it there, it may mutate with our different genetics and we could end up giving a bastard strain of it there to those who live there)
But I guess as long you’re not interrupting your force or beliefs…screw the others you may get sick.
Are you able to bring your horses anywhere other than home or other private properties of similar believers? (won’t ask about your dogs because I’m sure you don’t bother telling anyone they could be carriers of who knows what since you belief the leaf and dance you gave them made them healthy)
How about for those who compete? or those trail ride on public trails and are socially responsible and caring enough to make sure they’re not unwittingly transmitting stuff to other area equines? They vaccinate. it’s the responsible social thing to do…watch out for your fellow man/horse even if they never know you’re doing it. Remove ALL chance for possible infection over the personal beliefs you have.
However if you keep your horses home all the time and never do anything/go anywhere with them and make sure to keep it a closed herd…more power to you. But many of us don’t do that. We vaccinate because it’s the right thing to do for our horses and dogs and for everyone else’s. We won’t passively spread problems just because of a belief system.
