did you know that cleveland bays

^ Because its a rare breed and hence the gene pool is limited so it just takes time.

I’m presuming that all on this forum know that the Cleveland Bay was first and foremost really developed and purpose-bred to type to be a coaching horse - so though it was used for hunting and riding, it was used in large numbers as a gentleman’s light coaching horse. It was the desire for faster coaching horses and the crossing with the (then new) t/b that saw its dilution and hence decline as a pure breed and then the advant of the motor car that saw its ultimate decline. Real carriage driving enthusiasts will know that the Cleveland Bay was dominant in producing the Yorkshire Coach horse - a breed I’ve got familial connections with and then ultimately the Hackney Horse.

The UK Cleveland Bay Society is concerned to protect the pure bred Cleveland Bay NOT the part bred - though of course they have their use and purpose and are also a great type. Cross breeds are much much much more common but its true proven pure breds that are rare.

However you need to appreciate that in many ways it has had a resurgence. The breed (as absolutel proven pure breeds, with no dilution) was on the verge of extinction in the 1950’s and really until the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh became advocates for it. The SPARKS system seeks to ensure that breeding is not too close as is essential when there’s a small gene pool. Though of course this means it can’t suddenly become an established breed that’s huge in number. The focus has been on maintaining purity AND quality. To focus on generating number would do the breed a huge disservice and run the risk of doubling up on bad with all emanating from such a small gene pool.

I don’t think that UK buyers think the price is too high at all. At least they ordinarily get snapped up quickly and easily and you often find yourself having to book one and wait to get one. You can pick up a decent yearling filly for about £3,000 ($6,000).

My cross bred is by a c/b stallion, Timberland Huckleberry and out of a crossbred mare

Sporthorses

I suspect most posting here know that the CB was an all purpose horse. From reading various BBs, it also seems that many horse buyers want a specialist — particularly those who plan to show in a particular discipline such as dressage.

One thing that irks me is the put downs of the sporthorses, i.e., partbreds, particulary by some of the purebred breeders. At least that is how I perceive it.

In the US there are not enough purebred mares for a CB stallion owner to earn much via stud fees from purebred mare owners. It’s the non-CB mare owner or a CB sporthorse mare owner who can help pay the cost of keeping a purebred stallion. Such mare owners could possibly help the stallion owner turn a profit if the stallion attracted enough mares. CB Sporthorses are fine when it comes to collecting a stud fee.

It is hard enough to find a CB Sporthorse in the flesh competing in N.A. and darn near impossible to find a purebred competing. And it’s even more difficult to find a CB stallion in public, under saddle with a rider on his back. It’s the CB Sporthorses that are promoting the breed in this country when it comes to performance.

There are folks who own colts who plan to ride them and show. Some have posted here. But the mature stallions in N.A., with one or two exceptions, stay in a pasture or the breeding shed.

I find the line of thought to preserve the horse, but limit the breeding to be absurd when one considers several facts: 1. It is a closed stud book. 2. In the past, the stallions had to be inspected to receive a license & the issue of the CBHS licensing procedure in N.A. could fill pages. 3. Half the breeding population - the mares - are not inspected. So if you breed a purebred registered mare to a licensed purebred stallion what’s the problem? Saving the breed means getting the population numbers up.

For the time being in N.A., it’s the Sporthorses that have done and will continue to do much of the promotion of this breed.

^ You lost me totally with that posting! Who’s knocking or putting down sportshorses? What has that got to do with purebred Cleveland Bays? Why can’t a purebred Cleveland Bay stallion be used on a cross breed there? Who’s limiting the breeding? And how??

And then finally I just have to ask why are folks just keeping stallions as pasture ornaments? That seems a bit dumb. Here they’re out and about like any other horse.

One of the nicest ones I’ve ever personally known competed dressage in the olympics and was regularly hunted and hacked out.

When I lived in England, I had the opportunity to ride a lovely CB mare on a regular basis. She was good natured and easy to ride, but my instructor told me that they can have a reputation for a ‘stubborn streak’ – She was so attractive that out on hacks, I actually caught myself looking at our reflection in the farmhouse windows as we rode past! Talk about shallow on my part!

:lol: I’ve a mare that does that when she passes mirrors in the arena. You and she would get on well :winkgrin:

I think rather than stubborn they’re just not the quickest thinkers and learners and if they’re not sure what to do they safety-fail … so that means they’re inclined to stop. At least that’s been my personal experience with them

This is the quote that prompted my last post:

“The UK Cleveland Bay Society is concerned to protect the pure bred Cleveland Bay NOT the part bred - though of course they have their use and purpose and are also a great type. Cross breeds are much much much more common but its true proven pure breds that are rare.”

Protecting the pures means being concerned about the partbreds too. IMHO it is short-sighted to think otherwise. Due to the low population numbers, the CB sporthorses are functioning as the ambassadors for the breed. The CBHS & the CBHSNA should be concerned about both. Other breed groups have capitalized on “partbreds.” The Appendix Quarter Horse comes to mind. Perhaps there should be an Appendix Cleveland Bay Registry here in N.A. to deal with the N.A. Sporthorses.

[QUOTE=TN Lilly;3486973]
This is the quote that prompted my last post:

“The UK Cleveland Bay Society is concerned to protect the pure bred Cleveland Bay NOT the part bred - though of course they have their use and purpose and are also a great type. Cross breeds are much much much more common but its true proven pure breds that are rare.”

Protecting the pures means being concerned about the partbreds too. IMHO it is short-sighted to think otherwise. Due to the low population numbers, the CB sporthorses are functioning as the ambassadors for the breed. The CBHS & the CBHSNA should be concerned about both. Other breed groups have capitalized on “partbreds.” The Appendix Quarter Horse comes to mind. Perhaps there should be an Appendix Cleveland Bay Registry here in N.A. to deal with the N.A. Sporthorses.[/QUOTE]

You are getting excited about things you need to change from inside the Societies. Both function as mostly a volunteer organization, with I think, one part-time employee in the UK. Income to the Treasuries to promote with is limited, as is the people time to put in at Horse gatherings at the booths. EVERYTHING done at these venues is VOLUNTARY, usually paid space by the person sitting there in front.

As said, the Societies’ PRIMARY concern is keeping the Purebreds coming, of good quality, with diversity in bloodlines. I do think they are getting more concerned with the Partbreds, but it is a big change in focus. There just is not enough attention to spread it over a big area, not enough people or money. They are MOST concerned with the Pures because they are needed to create Partbreds. There are less Pures always, and each is of importance to the breed. Colts of various lines, combinations, getting gelded means they are not available for breeding. Yet not all colts are good enough to be stallions, pass inspection, breed quality would deteriorate.

UK owners breed and have to sell the products to pay the bills. A big breeder might register 4 foals in a year! They need to be desirable to be sold. Partbreds are quite desireable for their skills, sell well, faster. Alternating years with the Pure mares to CB and other stallions, makes the foals more saleable. They don’t often have the land or resources to keep the unsold animals forever. If their foals don’t sell, you DON’T breed the mare again!! Doesn’t matter how rare her blood is, you can’t feed the foals and mare with no income from sales.

There are a dedicated few CB folks, especially in the US, who have carried a lot of responsibility for years. They continue to work on getting the CB out in public as they can. Doing the boring Society stuff of paperwork, keeping us all tied together, knowing what is happening in other places across the wide spaces of the US and Canada. They put up their time and money as they have it, to present these horses for others to learn about.

Oddly enough, the US stallion owners are usually older, not even riders. They don’t get the horses out, for whatever reason, to compete. It takes a BUNCH of work to present a lovely horse in competition, money to pay good riders and trainers, to have him successful in his chosen area. Taking a stallion out is WORK, you do things MUCH differently than with mares and geldings. ALWAYS a chance of problems with a stallion. Most of the owners just have a couple CB animals, are trying to keep the CB horses going. No interest in competing. They stand him, hoping to break even on yearly expenses, willing to take the loss if he doesn’t get many mares in. Easier for them to keep him at home, do mares AI. Less chance of him getting hurt in transit, injured during work.

We have been in CB horses, the CBHSNA, owning Partbreds for many years. We see the new folks come and go, who want everything changed RIGHT NOW! Maybe if there were a few million dollars laying in the treasury, we COULD do all those things, improve the way things work. However, no millions around to do that, so it is one slow step at a time. And you see those folks for about 5 years, complaining, then they get a new interest and leave.

Maybe if our family had “staff” and a bottomless wallet, we could go out more, be in the public eye. Since we don’t have the above, we attend what we can, look the best possible in our presentations of these horses. We answer questions, give the Society address and websites out for more information.

Unfortunately, the people who enjoy owning the Bays, are usually more quiet and NOT VISIBLE. They go hacking in their backyards, local trails, may hunt him. Sometimes they compete at a local schooling activity. They have done competition before, own this CB or Partbred CB horse to have FUN with. It meets their needs, they don’t feel the need to prove how wonderful he is to others.

We have found the Bays we know to be best in the hands of experienced horse people. Skillful handlers and riders, with a deeper knowledge of horse thinking. I would NEVER say they are a beginner type horse as a breed. They are extremely smart, quick to learn, for good or bad. As mentioned by others, CBs are thinkers, wanting to COMPLETELY understand what you are asking of them, before going forward. Teaching them confidence, trust, boldness, takes time and skill in handling. NOT a 90 day or even a years work. If you FAIL THEM, they are even less likely to try next time, willing to wait and see what happens then. Beginner riders lack confidence in themselves, unwilling to push horse when needed, so failures escalate. Very easy to make a smart horse into a quitter or unruly. They are too big to muscle around, as other breeds sometimes are to change a bad habit.

We are back to that time factor in growing up, training steps, which just can’t be speeded up. Mine have no attention span over 10 minutes before age 3yrs. Trying to force the issue develops evasions, games, problems you don’t have if you don’t push learning. He may be 16H, wearing size 3 shoes, but the brain is not ready. He has good ground manners, wears bridles, saddles, but won’t accept drilling time. No one home to hear me! By age 4, he can do longer lesson times, more READY to listen. Has some patience. Bones are still growing for another 2 years, maybe more. Just the way CBs and CB Partbreds are made. You can’t force this breed to grow faster.

Buyers don’t want to hear that. They expect to be using that horse by age 3. Western Horse folks use their babies fairly hard because they are the epitome of “Can’t Wait Folks”. Have to be getting “some use out of him” so feed money is not wasted. Lunge line classes for the weanlings and yearlings. Big futurity classes for 2yr olds in Snaffle Bit or Hackamore. Reining and jumping at 3-4yrs. This is from the local to National level shows. A western breed horse in their hands is an old-timer at 4yrs old, both in mileage and experience. My CB horse has just started untangling his legs to respond to signals! I don’t want to promote the CBs to that kind of a future usage.

[QUOTE=goodhors;3487922]
Buyers don’t want to hear that. They expect to be using that horse by age 3. Western Horse folks use their babies fairly hard because they are the epitome of “Can’t Wait Folks”. Have to be getting “some use out of him” so feed money is not wasted. Lunge line classes for the weanlings and yearlings. Big futurity classes for 2yr olds in Snaffle Bit or Hackamore. Reining and jumping at 3-4yrs. This is from the local to National level shows. A western breed horse in their hands is an old-timer at 4yrs old, both in mileage and experience. My CB horse has just started untangling his legs to respond to signals! I don’t want to promote the CBs to that kind of a future usage.[/QUOTE]

Amen

Breyer, with talented sculptor Karen Gerhardt, released a lovely Cleveland Bay model horse based on the stallion Treygoyd Journeyman in 2006. Perhaps that will help get more people interested in the breed.

Photo here

Excellent posting Goodhors and thanks for the explanation of the USA market and stallion situation.

I’m still thinking that there’s no logic to TNLilly’s thoughts. The purebred Cleveland Bay is rare and at risk. NOT the part bred. The breed society has specific objectives and is concerned to protect and promote the breed. I wouldn’t expect anything else from a breed society that was set up to ensure purity of breed and type. (It would be like the golden retriever club promoting mongrels!) Indeed I think it would be absurd if they did anything else. The fact they’ve not got a bunch of folks, time and money is almost irrelevent. If they had and spent it on promoting cross breeding then IMO that would be a waste and of no useful purpose whatsoever. Its the BREED that’s at risk! They do have an ancillary aim to improve the standard of horses in general and of course specifically through the introduction of the Cleveland Bay.

But without the Cleveland Bay PUREBRED, there can’t be part breds.

The last one we trained here was rising 6 years old. I’ve never personally done one under 5 either. We backed that one and put it to harness. It was a first “Cleveland Experience” for one of my staff and when she rode it she said it was like riding a jugernaught with delayed steering. She went on to say he was responsive to light aids but it just took some time to compute from aid, to brain, to action! I thought that pretty much summarised them.

The part bred of my wife’s is an absolutely sweetheart of a gentleman of a horse. He’s no idea how big and strong he is and is extremely loving but by gosh he came across as “thick” and we didn’t do a thing with him till he was 4 either.

My farm in Yorkshire is just down the road from the Yorkshire Livestock Centre where the Society holds its annual event and sale and there’s both pure and part bred there. Most often though they’re sold long before they get there and by private sale and because the market for them is reasonably good and because they’re generally of good quality and because the Society has worked hard to ensure the purity of breed AND type. Mine is a half bred Cleveland but whilst he’s pretty typical in tempermant and looks, he (rightly so IMO) can’t be registered because he’s got a white blaze. He’s too big as well, though that wouldn’t necessarily exclude him.

Goodhors, I am aware of the issues facing both Societies and belong to the N.A. Society. You are right. But the issues/problems/concerns you raise needed to be raised in the Societies and over the past few years have been raised. Changes are happening.

One major issue in N.A. is that some Society members expect expensive promotions of the breed. There simply is not the money to do this.

I understand the fact that many of the current stallion owners in N.A. either do not ride their stallions or do not ride them in public. There are many reasons for this including the fact that some of these intact male horses likely do not have dispositions that allow them to be ridden by just anyone. I realize too that to show up and have perfectly groomed and presented horses takes time, expertise & money.

I am hopeful that the younger colt/owners will have intact male horses that can be credibly shown in public. You don’t have to go far to find stallions of many other breeds out in public acting like well-behaved horses.

I personally think that the N.A. Society needs a Sporthorse registry. It would provide some needed funds. Far too many of the Sporthorses simply are not registered.

Again, I fully understand the need to preserve the pures. I also understand the economics. On the Yahoo forum it was basically stated that in the UK buyers often prefer a partbred out of a purebred mare rather than sired by a purebred stallion. Money influences decisions. Hence the purebred mares putting partbreds on the ground.

In the N.A. Society the oft-repeated mantra is “It’s all about the horses.” Well it is NOT all about the horses. It’s about the horses and the money. Until their is a better market for these horses, they are going to struggle along. You are right. There is no reason for a breeder of pures to keep putting pures on the ground when they do not sell at a decent price. And that gets us back to a prior discussion on this thread regarding pricing.

Thomas-1, I disagree with you. Those Sporthorses with strong-CB traits and their owners are the ones promoting the breed here in N.A. for the time being. Treating them as substandard and inferior to the pures is unwise. They may not be pures, but they are key to the survival of the pures. Your example of the Golden Retreiver is a poor one since the Golden Retriever is hardly endangered. Using dogs for that matter is a poor example since the economics of raising a dog is far less than what it costs to raise and market a horse. There is little if any comparison between the two.

[QUOTE=TN Lilly;3488269]
Thomas-1, I disagree with you. Those Sporthorses with strong-CB traits and their owners are the ones promoting the breed here in N.A. for the time being. Treating them as substandard and inferior to the pures is unwise. [/QUOTE] I’m still not sure what you’re disagreeing with.

But you’re making a huge assumption there. NO-ONE is treating them as sub-standard or inferior. Its just different and its just NOT a purebred.

I’m not sure what you’re suggesting with your assumption but cross bred sports horses with Cleveland bay influence are pretty much accepted here as being a good thing. (Though obviously dependent on what its cross bred with!) Indeed the track record is that part bred Cleveland Bays have strong evidence of success at all sorts of competion: from driving (coaching and HDT and private driving showing), to riding (dressage, eventing, show jumping etc etc etc).

No one doubts the value of cross breeding the Cleveland Bay and indeed that’s why they were used to develop a lot of sports horses initially and such as the Hackney and many other (now) established breeds besides.

They may not be pures, but they are key to the survival of the pures.
Not at all. No way can dilution through cross breeding be critical to the survival of a pure bred! Indeed it’s partly because the cross breds were so popular that the pure bred Cleveland Bay numbers reduced. Truth is that cross breeds were MORE popular and sought after than the pure bred.

The Queen, along with a few dedicated enthusiasts has been a huge advocate for the breed and as such they’re passionate about ensuring the Cleveland Bay doesn’t vanish off the face of the earth. Now that isn’t likely going to happen with the part bred C/B. Its out there all over the place and an influence in a heck of a lot of sports horses.

I’d suggest if you want to start a campaign to promote part bred C/B’s that you do so or else take a look at this :wink:

www.registeryourpartbredhereandgivememoney.com

Thomas-1, I realize that the partbreds cannot be bred with the purebreds. I do not think anyone posting on this thread is that stupid.

N.A. is very big. There are so few pures that most members of the horse-buying public in N.A. will never see a purebred. A partbred may get them interested in the pures. Promotion and marketing are key to saving the breed.

Partbreds and their owners have been treated as substandard within the context of Society politics. As a member of the N.A. Society, there had been an “understanding” that one needed to own a purebred to be on the Board of Directors of that Society even though the bylaws have never stated such. The N.A. Society now has at least one board member who owns no pures. This director works as hard at saving the breed as the members who own pures.

Another example is the inspection process for partbred stallions that had existed in N.A. Had the purebred stallions been subjected to the performance component of the inspection regime, the breed might be doing better.

Your link does not work.

[QUOTE=TN Lilly;3488313]
Thomas-1, I realize that the partbreds cannot be bred with the purebreds.[/QUOTE] Erm… they can! At least they can here anyway!

N.A. is very big. There are so few pures that most members of the horse-buying public in N.A. will never see a purebred. A partbred may get them interested in the pures. Promotion and marketing are key to saving the breed.
it might but I’d say its more likely to stimulate interest in using the cleveland bay as a cross breed. Furthermore as there’s so few to go round it seems somewhat bizarre to stimulate the market too much and particularly when large increase in demand couldn’t be provided for. I think its more a case of “slowly, slowly, catch a monkey” :wink:

Partbreds and their owners have been treated as substandard within the context of Society politics. As a member of the N.A. Society, there had been an “understanding” that one needed to own a purebred to be on the Board of Directors of that Society even though the bylaws have never stated such. The N.A. Society now has at least one board member who owns no pures. This director works as hard at saving the breed as the members who own pures.
A private society can decide for itself what rules and criteria to apply. Got to say though that I don’t think its an irrational rule even if it were written down on paper. I for one would take great exception to a society for the preservation and promotion of purebred cleveland bays being run by folks who didn’t have anything to do one in terms of ownership and whose vested interest was in cross breeds

Another example is the inspection process for partbred stallions that had existed in N.A. Had the purebred stallions been subjected to the performance component of the inspection regime, the breed might be doing better.
Maybe it would and maybe it wouldn’t but I honestly think you’re missing the point.

The pure breed Cleveland Bay is a rare breed. To be a registered as a pure bred you have to prove geneology NOT performance. Of course where breeds have grading systems and actually grade for quality then that’s to the benefit of the breed. But with Cleveland Bays, they’re rare so you have to find them first and once they’re more established that’s when I’d say you go looking to grade them.

If you go weeding out those that haven’t passed a performance component whilst they’re on the rare breeds surivival listing, then there’d just be even fewer around.

Hence decisions regarding quality and purpose are left with the enthusiasts and the likes of the Registry and SPARKS seek to help with those decisions.

Your link does not work.
You don’t say! Do these ones?

www.notquiteapurebredclevelandbay.com

www.paytoregisteracrossbredcleveland.com

:winkgrin:

Thomas,

Neither link worked for me. :frowning:

I have wanted a Cleveland Bay since I first saw a photo of one in Margaret Cabell Self’s Horseman’s Encyclopedia (published more than 40 years ago).

I was sad to learn in recent years that they are an endangered breed. They’ve been crossed with TBs, even for coaching, for at least 200 years, I think. Are the Queen’s Cleveland Bays purebred?

I wish I could have a purebred one–a real Cleveland Bay.

[QUOTE=DancingAppy;3488967]
Thomas,

Neither link worked for me. :([/QUOTE]

www.gotcha.com :winkgrin:

OMG, Thomas, you’re bad…

Took me a while but I get it now…

Wow, I feel dumb…

(you responded before I could post this)

I guess that’s what I get for only reading the 4th page of this thread…:lol:

Raising a stallion is hard, pure or part, or any breed for that matter. I am one that is guilty of not getting their stallion out and about. I have a 10 year old CB/TB, well bred on his tb side VERY athletic, but for me “life happened”. I had a three daughters within 4 years. The first being stillborn which made me begin to weigh how much competing Aspen was worth. He was broke to ride and ridden up until he was four and then I became a broodmare. Now that my youngest is beginning to take direction more. My hope is to start riding Aspen more and getting him out for more people to see. But for me family will come before any horse. I think if you look at the pure and partbred stallion owners not competing most are older, or they are younger with young children. When Aspen was younger, 4 and under I drug him around everywhere, expos, Dressage at Devon (and not the CB division we did the open division), etc. I thought I’d compete and ride him, heck in college I told friends I’d be riding him in the Olympics. But until you hit that situation you never know.

Fingers can be pointed at anyone for everything. 1-People not riding/competing stallions, 2-People not breeding their pure mares, 3-People not riding their pure mares, 4-People charging too much for sporthorse prospects, and it goes on. I think we just have to look at ourselves and what we are doing. I breed most of my mares to my stallion and sell the prospects. I try to sell them young, by doing so I can give people stellar deals and I don’t have to feed them for 3-4 years, plus they tend to stay with the people that bought them and have an early bond. I generally breed to 1 or 2 outside pure stallions a year. Pick my tb mare that I think best compliments them and have gotten some awesome offspring doing that. My three year old pure mare is at the breeders and at day 26 past last breeding, not in heat, so I think we are bred! I’ll get her ultrasounded when I pick her up. So I feel I’m doing what I can…oh and I need to get my pure colt trailered in from CO. He will be exciting stuff also! :slight_smile: