Dressage - Michael Barisone

[eggbutt]

So, now you applaud us. Please make up your mind(s).

[YankeeDuchess]

@eggbutt

@YankeeDuchess

You’re right that if I actually knew any of these people, I would be a lot more circumspect for fear of letting something slip. But I don’t know any of them.

Yet, you post ad though you are posting fact rather than your speculation and imagination. Talk about being fascinated! You seem to be the one always lurking.

BTW, I had no intention of posting until you brought me into the discussion.

Where did I claim to be posting any new facts or even new speculation?

@cutter99 asked me if I believed Lauren had not been asked to leave, and I answered the question.

[ASB_Stars]

Ummmm… I think we’re back to reading for comprehension.

[YankeeDuchess]

@eggbutt

So, now you applaud us. Please make up your mind(s).

That’s correct. I applaud you for your newfound reticence. Sincerely. Take the win.

[BigMama1]

So then what is the point of you re-hashing all the speculation AGAIN, let alone challenging those who don’t agree with your made up theories? We don’t know what happened. We may never know what happened. There is literally nothing new to discuss. Do you not see how silly it is to get into arguments and challenge other people who don’t accept your made up version of events about which you have no personal knowledge? You seem more than a little obsessed with this case. It’s creepy and weird.

[YankeeDuchess]

@BigMama1

So then what is the point of you re-hashing all the speculation AGAIN, let alone challenging those who don’t agree with your made up theories? We don’t know what happened. We may never know what happened. There is literally nothing new to discuss. Do you not see how silly it is to get into arguments and challenge other people who don’t accept your made up version of events about which you have no personal knowledge? You seem more than a little obsessed with this case. It’s creepy and weird.

Indeed, it is common tactic for other posters to ask me a direct question, then criticize me for answering it, @BigMama1

[eggbutt]

@YankeeDuchess

There was something “important” about Lauren that caused him not to just ask her to leave, with or without 30 days notice. “Important” often means $$$$ and multiple high level horses.

What on earth makes you speculate her horses or money had anything to do with anything. I see grasping for a reasonable (in your mind) explanation.

As mentioned so many times in so many threads, I’m sure much will be revealed in the trial. Whether you believe what is reported/released will be your responsibility.

Thanks for the reprieve from other priorities in my life. There is nothing more to say as the posted article says it all coupled with the posted legal filings. Everything in the lives of the parties involved is fairgame for investigation and analysis in this trial.

[YankeeDuchess]

@eggbutt

@YankeeDuchess

There was something “important” about Lauren that caused him not to just ask her to leave, with or without 30 days notice. “Important” often means $$$$ and multiple high level horses.

What on earth makes you speculate her horses or money had anything to do with anything. I see grasping for a reasonable (in your mind) explanation.

As mentioned so many times in so many threads, I’m sure much will be revealed in the trial. Whether you believe what is reported/released will be your responsibility.

Thanks for the reprieve from other priorities in my life. There is nothing more to say as the posted article says it all coupled with the posted legal filings. Everything in the lives of the parties involved is fairgame for investigation and analysis in this trial.

1. For the fourth time, I responded to a direct question posed to me.
2. The one new fact introduced in the thread is that there may be plea deal, in which case there will not be a criminal trial.
3. Should I hear ominous music in the background when I read that you, as an insider, announce that “Everything in the lives of the parties involved is fair game for investigation and analysis in this trial” if it happens, which maybe it won’t?

[eggbutt]

@YankeeDuchess

Should I hear ominous music in the background when I read that you, as an insider, announce that “ Everything in the lives of the parties involved is fair game for investigation and analysis in this trial” if it happens, which maybe it won’t?

Weren’t you questioning the reason for verifying who LaLaPoprider is and the request for 6 years of posts? Weren’t you wondering the relevance of that request? I was merely pointing out to you that everything is fair game for evidence, including for possible plea negotiations.

For what it’s worth, I don’t know anyone who knows any particulars about any plea discussions or the potential for an offer of a plea. The article posted was news to me.

[ASB_Stars]

@YankeeDuchess

You suggested that I should not post since I was not an attorney, but you yourself were posting. How was I illogical in inferring that you permitted yourself to post because, unlike me, you were an attorney?

PS. Of course I know you are not an attorney.

I’ve tried to have you understand that you need to read for comprehension. Here is what I said:

@ASB_Stars

The real issues here are that you aren’t an attorney, and while you can opine all day long on what you believe could happen, with the very few actual facts that you have at your disposal, and your lack of courtroom experience, it is worth exactly what people here are paying you for it. You are extrapolating on hearsay. Not a wise thing to do.

I didn’t say you shouldn’t post. I implied, broadly, that your opinion had little factual value, because it isn’t based upon anything other than, well, your opinion. by “extrapolating on hearsay”, you are really just making shit up. You can post all day long. Just do not expect anyone to take you seriously, or give any value to your fantasies. It is apparent, at least to me, that you feel the need to share YOUR opinion, and YOUR prognostications. And, you’d like to be taken seriously. You aren’t. If you WERE an attorney, you probably wouldn’t be posting all of this crap anyway.

So, given the fact that you aren’t an attorney, and you do not have any facts that are not already public, why are you doing this?

I’ve spent enough time on you for today.

Carry on. Or not, hopefully.

[YankeeDuchess]

@eggbutt

@YankeeDuchess

Should I hear ominous music in the background when I read that you, as an insider, announce that “ Everything in the lives of the parties involved is fair game for investigation and analysis in this trial” if it happens, which maybe it won’t?

Weren’t you questioning the reason for verifying who LaLaPoprider is and the request for 6 years of posts? Weren’t you wondering the relevance of that request? I was merely pointing out to you that everything is fair game for evidence, including for possible plea negotiations.

For what it’s worth, I don’t know anyone who knows any particulars about any plea discussions or the potential for an offer of a plea. The article posted was news to me.

Yes. Yes.

[YankeeDuchess]

@ASB_Stars

@YankeeDuchess

You suggested that I should not post since I was not an attorney, but you yourself were posting. How was I illogical in inferring that you permitted yourself to post because, unlike me, you were an attorney?

PS. Of course I know you are not an attorney.

I’ve tried to have you understand that you need to read for comprehension. Here is what I said:

@ASB_Stars

The real issues here are that you aren’t an attorney, and while you can opine all day long on what you believe could happen, with the very few actual facts that you have at your disposal, and your lack of courtroom experience, it is worth exactly what people here are paying you for it. You are extrapolating on hearsay. Not a wise thing to do.

I didn’t say you shouldn’t post. I implied, broadly, that your opinion had little factual value, because it isn’t based upon anything other than, well, your opinion. by “extrapolating on hearsay”, you are really just making shit up. You can post all day long. Just do not expect anyone to take you seriously, or give any value to your fantasies. It is apparent, at least to me, that you feel the need to share YOUR opinion, and YOUR prognostications. And, you’d like to be taken seriously. You aren’t. If you WERE an attorney, you probably wouldn’t be posting all of this crap anyway.

So, given the fact that you aren’t an attorney, and you do not have any facts that are not already public, why are you doing this?

I’ve spent enough time on you for today.

Carry on. Or not, hopefully.

Sorry to still be lacking in comprehension, but if only a very few people (Lauren, @eggbutt, @tryintogethere) have any inside information, and they wisely are not sharing that information, what is the metaphysical purpose of these threads on Kanarek/Barisone?

Neither of us are attorneys and I fail to comprehend how that non attorney status means that either one of us should be prohibited from discussing publicly available information.

[BigMama1]

Pro tip: just because someone asks you a question or responds to your post, you don’t HAVE to reply. Especially if your reply is something you have already posted a gazillion times

[YankeeDuchess]

@BigMama1

Pro tip: just because someone asks you a question or responds to your post, you don’t HAVE to reply. Especially if your reply is something you have already posted a gazillion times

Thanks for the pro tip, @BigMama1. I am so dense that that would never, ever have occurred to me.

[vxf111]

This solves a mystery for me!

[Joanne]

@YankeeDuchess

It was pretty shocking that a high level dressage trainer would shoot his own multiple horse client, IMO.

It was pretty shocking that she stayed if she thought her life was in danger, IMO.

[YankeeDuchess]

@Joanne

@YankeeDuchess

It was pretty shocking that a high level dressage trainer would shoot his own multiple horse client, IMO.

It was pretty shocking that she stayed if she thought her life was in danger, IMO.

Lauren responded several times in several threads on that issue. @BigMama1 has instructed me not to rehash old threads, so of course I won’t.

[Joanne]

@YankeeDuchess

@BigMama1 has instructed me not to rehash old threads, so of course I won’t.

Thanks.

[skydy]

@trubandloki

@Scribbler

But the thing that puzzles me is how any Coth poster could supply a complete list of everything they ever posted here!! I guess there is a “my posts” function but what about things you altered or deleted or that got lost in the platform change?

I would guess, like all things computer, it is out there and the powers in charge of all things computer at COTH can get it. It does not seem like that big of an obstacle.

Yes, she clearly said here, on COTH, that she had put microphones in the barn and had Barisone on tape plotting with others against her. Not surprising that the defense wants to see those posts again, present them to the court, and have the tapes, if they actually exist, produced.

Once on the internet, always on the internet. Many people learn that the hard way.

[soloudinhere]

You know, I’m sort of surprised we haven’t seen a “ripped from the headlines” episode of Law and Order on this one.