[QUOTE=OverandOnward;8543617]
The Buyer(s) were never going to pay all this themselves. The strategy was always to use the ‘free’ gofundme money. Based on what was posted when that all came up … so far back in this thread, I have no idea where.
Although it is true that posters other than the OP suggested it rather broadly, at that time there was a more unified pov being expressed. That seems to be a typical pattern in these threads. It is usually for forerunner to the downturn …
Oh, I don’t know. The first horse I ever owned and sold ended up going from my pasture board situation to a lifetime home with a 14x14 stall he visited for meals, in between being hand-walked to and from extensive time in comfortable, tree-shaded, grassy paddocks. All this for a little bit of work carting around a junior who had no power to argue with him. Good for him! :winkgrin:
I had to figure he understood the deal, watching their rounds. He gifted her with many ribbons and a few champs, and she never understood why she had so much trouble riding any other horse. :lol:
What’s the legal definition of a ‘disadvantaged child’?
The Buyer has been very clear that it is a child who could not afford the price of a more expensive pony. I don’t know what the Seller thinks would qualify.
A lot of us readers are getting rather stuck on the price discount definition, knowing the purchase price is NOT the big horse expense. It’s upkeep, maintenance & repair, costs which escalate magnificently for ‘A’ competitors. Costs that are not different based on purchase price.
I’d think Seller would know that as well if Seller was at all aware of the ‘A’ show circuit.
Hey, I think I might be ‘disadvantaged’, too … :winkgrin:
Throw in boarding dramas and the series could go on for years! Without becoming repetitious! :lol:[/QUOTE]
I’ve had ideas that there should be a program about caring for older horses called “This Old Horse”. Maybe we have some new ideas for RFD-TV?