[QUOTE=7arabians;6965939]
“Sure, that poor horse will be “saved from slaughter” by well-meaning folks, but that inflated profit will go towards buying another 4-5 horses that are better “fit” for slaughter, and that’s where they go, directly. No one ever sees those horses.”
Liberty, You have summed it up nicely. Some horses are simply best routed to slaughter as they have no other earthly purpose/use. Now, more will go directly to slaughter. No crime in that as long as the end is humane. Valley Meats is waiting for one final signature. Then they can help reduce the number of unwanted horses. Sad, but true![/QUOTE]
The problem with this is you have it backward. The horses that might be useful, i.e. younger, not starved, not lame, are sent to slaughter while the horses who are in no danger of being slaughtered, too old, too skinny, too sick, too lame, too blind, too small, too grey, etc. etc. are the ones marketed to bleeding hearts at hugely inflated prices so the KB can then go out and buy MORE marketable horses to fill his slaughter contract. Regardless of what horses go where no more horses go to slaughter than the buyers of the meat want. And if all those horses are unwanted, why aren’t they all FREE?