[QUOTE=MoonoverMississippi;6967881]
The way I understand it from some of the “incidents” mentioned in the past is that they don’t “buy” a “broker” horse until it has somewhere to go, immediately.
As I understood it, they post a horse, collect “donations”, then when the horse finally has a place to go they “buy” it from the KB (because he doesn’t want to deal with the people).
The horse leaves immediately, so there is little/no feed, etc. on the broker horses: only those in the “actual” rescue portion require that expense.
The ownership of the “broker” horses is what is puzzling: sometimes they say they buy them and resell to the new owner to keep the KB out of the mix.
However, when some people have complained about injury, etc., they were told ac4H never owns the horses, they are simply a listing service (for a small fee, of course) who transfers the $$ to the KB immediately, and the sale is actually between the KB and new owner, with the rescue simply an uninterested intermediary to the transaction. So which is it this time?
In addition, I would love to see their paperwork and how a rescue can also broker horses: I think the IRS and Feds may argue unrelated business income, which would be taxable.[/QUOTE]
It has always seemed to me that the story of who owned the horse at what time always conveniently shifted such that no one from AC4H was left holding the bag regardless of the circumstances. If you read the story of the saved TB [in which the deceased breeders ex in laws were contacted]… ownership conveniently shifted.
Wasn’t that a thread on here? I think the horses’ name was Luckyallmylife of something like that?