Hanoverian licensing results

One sidebar: for the first time in over a decade of attending, the horses behavior was night and day from triangle to indoors. The triangle had the normal amount of 2 yr old antics, but all were relatively well behaved. Inside was another story. Many did not want to enter the jump chute and jumped over and around the whips and fences. One of the premium stallions, a jumper, on the announcement of the premium(no fences in the arena at the time and all by himself with his normal handler)hit his handler who required emergency care in the arena and was taken to the hospital.

Just FYI, the horse did not hit the handler. It was the handler’s first time in MANY years showing a stallion in hand but since the stallion was being named premium he wanted to show it off. The handler WRAPPED the reins around his hand and when the horse spooked from the yelling and clapping, the handler couldn’t let go and was dragged. He is fine and was present at the horse’s award ceremony the next day. I met someone at licensing that is friends w/ handler

[QUOTE=DownYonder;7235548]
I was referring to the United colt - “What did everyone think of the walk on the United colt?”

'Cause I thought it was pretty yucky from the video, and I have now gotten feedback from folks who were there that it was a very lackluster, “poor quality” walk.[/QUOTE]

Apparently the walk for the United colt was accepted b/c there is a pro rider on the judging committee (can’t remember her name) and she supposedly strongly suggested his licensing and claimed his walk could be easily improved w/ training. His trot was so stunning, he should just trot the whole dressage test

[QUOTE=alexandra;7234372]
There was also live stream on Hannoveraner.com for free.

I am hoiping that 41 goes to Celle. Good ol blodlines combined with something modern resultetd in a well moving, loose. elastic and very pretty jumper. A very very good overall package ![/QUOTE]

#41 was my favorite! I was able to meet him at his farm before the licensing, sweet sweet boy! Fell in love w/ him before being told he would be in the licensing

[QUOTE=fannie mae;7238622]
they are nominated by the vorstand and need to be confirmed by the delegates - at least that is the case in westfalia and i assume it is the same with any other verband.

re totilas
there have been four totilas sons so far at the various preselections (westf, oldbg, hann) and non of them belonged there (my very personal opinion).
the licensing of the one here in hanover was a slap in the face to any other stallion owner who had a less critical stallion out there that wasn’t licensed for good reason. they have to accept it and they do. however, the spontaneous reaction of the public truly speaks for itself and the licensing committe lost a lot of credibility letting this one pass.[/QUOTE]

YES!!

[QUOTE=alexandra;7239381]

Regarding the Totilas, rumours are floating that Gal/Glock only wanted to buy him as lisenced stallion so I really doubt that he will be gelded. And I was sitting on the other sidfe of the committeee when Dr. Schade gave the judggment licensed and all people whistled. The reactions in the face of the committee were rather interesting to put it mildly !

The crowd gave its clear opinion to that act of licensing this stallion. And we are not talking about a crowd that has just been to level 1 dressge shows as spectators. On friday I saw so many German top riders and also international people, we are really speaking of a crowd that included a lot of real experts !

This is a licensing so I expect stallion material there. And not material that a top rider selects. Do not misunderstand me there. Of course we need breeding stallions to be able to produce horses that topriders want, but the licensing process is more to it, it has to ensure all sorts of qualities stay in the breed. This means they need to look after the fact that walk needs to be present, they need to look after the fact that strong backs are there, so that we do not end up breeding this movement wonders, that are not able to hold up to the collection work - (same accounts for jumpers). They need to take care that we do not have crooked or horses with fundamental issues as multiplies in the breed. etc. etc.

A rider can decide for himself whether he can live with a crooked leg, mediocre walk etc. and can still end up in the top international levels.

But the licensing is not a selling event of great furture horses as such. It ist the main event that ensures the quality of a breed for today and for the future. Hence an animal that is good enough to be selected by a toprider, but has other issues that make the crowd of a licensing whistle, and yelling booh, should not have been licensed. Period.

Sabine and I have a friend that had a stallion in the same ring as the totilas. A colt that was not super super, but all correct cnfirmation correct, pretty and with three equally good gaits. That one got not licensed where quite a few people said well, he could have been licensed. And than as a breeder/owner of that one you see a few horses later the Totilas beeing licensed - that is a slap in the face of that breeder and also others !

I would not put it as hard as Fanniemae though but I have the feeling licensing this Totilas was a matter of generating a higher price. In the end he would also first need to fulfill performance requirements and than breeders need to decide if they can life with the quality. I guess it will be the same as with Totilas himself. In the end not too many breeders will use him, so the damage to the breed maybe rather small…[/QUOTE]

YES! And where I bolded, time must yet wait as this was only his first crop brought forward. Perhaps he may be a stallion that does not fit with Germany’s mare base, but he might do better with another type of mare base. Although with the ones that Fannie Mae mentioned who were brought to other registries, it may well be that enthusiasm will decline nonetheless.


Consider - the basic gaits must be naturally there. Especially the walk and the canter. A good rider can improve the trot many times. A trot does not MUCH for the horse in regards to physical abilities. A naturally good, balanced, swinging, rhythmical walk inherently proves the muster of the basic and intrinsic glue required of every dressage test. The canter must be through, balanced, swinging and uphill with the hindquarter biomechanics carrying the power of the horse. The trot is your flash in the pan, but it is little else. The walk and the canter prove THE HORSE.  Some of the stallions presented who were licensed had gaits which were doubtful. As a breeder and retired dressage rider, these do not spark interest from me. 

The judges are supposed to be the protectors of the Hanoverian TYPE and BREED CHARACTERISTICS and to strive to eliminate as many faults as possible. Severe winging or paddling, or a horse who is strung out instead of coupled together, a horse who has brains in his head instead of flying around like an idiot on a loose cannonball. The inherent characteristics of Hanoverian breed type are a strong, correct foundational body, with a good brain in its skull and a highly defined athletic ability. My words putting together the basic parameters. 

And also of the 50 or so stallions that were licensed here, some will not go on to SPT. A rare couple or few who were not licensed here may go on to become approved by sheer performance values.

How was #81 in person?

[QUOTE=JWB;7240670]
How was #81 in person?[/QUOTE]

I loved him and want to keep track of him. My notes say he had a good walk, good movement in general, and a decent jump. I liked all three of the Furst Romancier colts, but especially him.

no. 81 was sold to spanish buyers. I guess it will be diffcult to keep track of him. The spanish like buying hanoverian jumpers, but so far other than in italy no bigger breeding group does exist there.
One can just hope they have the intention of breeding him and leave him for bigger numbers in Germany…

[QUOTE=Kerole;7235979]
Mardell, it’s interesting what you (and others) observed ring-side of the Totalis. In the video he doesn’t look bad at all, neither grounded nor overweight. He looks light in front at trot, attentive, active behind, with a good walk. And these are candid videos not fancy edited stallion promos.

Funny how the real thing can be a let down. This is definately something to keep in mind :)[/QUOTE]

Happy to stand alone in my thoughts of him too, I love the suppleness in all three gaits The freedom and suppleness of the forehand particularly in the walk, the poise of each stride (thinking expressive lateral work). I also appreciate the suppleness of the hind engine in trot and the articulation of the stifle and hind end mechanics and can imagine the ability of passage and piaffe in the future.

Purchased by Glock I guess he will be intended for Edward so keen to see how he develops. :slight_smile:

Regarding #81 - Well I lived in Spain and they tend to NOT geld. I don’t know how available he’ll be to the rest of the world but I hope he’ll stay on the radar. It’s exciting to see a stallion with that much blood!

Interesting. I asked Dr. Brockman about #81 and he told me he was going to somewhere in Germany, but I didn’t write it down.

On the jumping stallions… #49 (Lordanos /Acorado) was AMAZING!! the type and jump was spectacular and his movement was also very good. None of the online pictures do him justice.

Our friends bought the Stolzenberg/ Graf Grannus that will be going to Canada. He has the movement/type/ disposition for the Hunters or jumpers. He will certainly be one to watch for in North America!!!

Someone earlier in this post asked about the Balou… He was quite heavy and large and was not licensed.

Signature - thanks for the jumper info. I watched the videos on quite a few of the jumper stallions and was wondering what they looked like live. The Lordanos was not my favorite on the video clip, too stiff in his topline for me/ did not use his neck and back as well in the air as I would like, but it is always a different impression on video, so it is great to hear from live viewer. Did you see the Castino x Calido ? And the Quite Rubin with the Epsom dam looked very interesting. I would have also loved to take home the Valentino x Contendro as a hunter :slight_smile: Congrats to your friends on the Stolzenberg/Graf Grannus!!

[QUOTE=BaysofourLives;7240442]

Just FYI, the horse did not hit the handler. It was the handler’s first time in MANY years showing a stallion in hand but since the stallion was being named premium he wanted to show it off. The handler WRAPPED the reins around his hand and when the horse spooked from the yelling and clapping, the handler couldn’t let go and was dragged. He is fine and was present at the horse’s award ceremony the next day. I met someone at licensing that is friends w/ handler[/QUOTE]

Heavens, what kind of idiot does that? I learned not to do that when I was about 18 and the mare I was handling bolted. Dislocated my little finger so it was lying flat against my palm. Ick. Hurt. NEVER, ever, EVER wrap anything attached to a horse around your hand…or for that matter, ANY part of your body. Can’t believe an experienced handler would do that…

Well, he probably won’t do it again. Glad he’s ok.

Rancho-
Baysofourlives has the catalog with our notes. We do hunters so the style “scores” were based on that but certainly scope should be reflected. The most Huntery were the Stakkato’s (the jump is extremely consistent in every one we saw in Germany… quite outstanding ) btw- there is a Stakkato at the 70dt that is super! The lordanos’ were definitely consistently the “type” and were very good movers and of course the Stolzenberg was really nice hunter type but had the scope to do the jumpers as his breeding would suggest.

I will say it is fairly eye opening to see this in person versus video. The Fürstenball - Wie Weltmeyer is super beautiful and I think, as others do, he will be one to watch and will be seeing a lot of mares. Videos and pictures do not do him or the Lordanos justice in any way! The Ampere/ Weltruhm was also very correct and nice of the dressage horses and probably deserves a mention for those keeping an eye out to the future.

One thing I think you can not see well and while this is very bothersome to most US buyers/riders is the number of horses that paddle (almost exclusively the dressage bred horses) This is not seen as a major issue by the Europeans as it is with us.

We were able to not only watch/experience all of this but we did this on the Hanoverian Verband’s breeders course so we got very insightful information/guidance and were able to meet with and see some of the stallions at the rearers farms INVALUABLE!!! I would strong suggest everyone that breeds warmbloods to attend. We have been breeding for over 10 years and really learned so much and had the time of our lives… OT but I thought important to mention :wink:

[QUOTE=RanchoAdobe;7242605]
Signature - thanks for the jumper info. I watched the videos on quite a few of the jumper stallions and was wondering what they looked like live. The Lordanos was not my favorite on the video clip, too stiff in his topline for me/ did not use his neck and back as well in the air as I would like, but it is always a different impression on video, so it is great to hear from live viewer. Did you see the Castino x Calido ? And the Quite Rubin with the Epsom dam looked very interesting. I would have also loved to take home the Valentino x Contendro as a hunter :slight_smile: Congrats to your friends on the Stolzenberg/Graf Grannus!![/QUOTE]

The Lordanos, #49, was the favorite of just about everyone in our group. He was a lovely horse. My notes on the Castino x Calido say he had good movement, was a premium, and sold for $35k. The Quite Rubin got a note of effortless jump at height, sold for $35k and was licensed.

[QUOTE=monami;7242773]

I will say it is fairly eye opening to see this in person versus video.

One thing I think you can not see well and while this is very bothersome to most US buyers/riders is the number of horses that paddle (almost exclusively the dressage bred horses) This is not seen as a major issue by the Europeans as it is with us. [/QUOTE]

I recall that some years ago a stallion was approved who paddled quite a bit…El Bundy? Don Fredrico? Can’t remember.

But it shocked Americans and the Europeans were like…“huh? what’s the bit deal?” Difference in values.

So do any of the extreme paddlers come to mind from this year’s crop?

I personally would have to see a whole bunch of good attributes in a stallion before I would use one that paddles. YMMV.

A LOT of them paddle! It is not seen as a major issue just a lower score in correctness of gaits.

[QUOTE=Kyzteke;7242805]
I recall that some years ago a stallion was approved who paddled quite a bit… Don Fredrico? .[/QUOTE]

Don Frederico is know to paddle a lot and he was the one that Americans seemed to comment on. But he produces very good dressage offspring (if a bit spicy at times).

Loved the Furstenball - Wie Weltmeyer, he was so beautiful, so if the clipmyhorse videos don’t do him justice, I guess he must be drop dead gorgeous in person!

In viewing the group down to #82 (will view the rest later), I liked in no particular order:

#31 Accorado Stakkato
#25 Diamond Hit Lauries Crusador xx
#44 Livello Calypso II - incredible riding horse. not licensed but whoever snapped him up got a diamond in the rough competition horse IMHO.
#50 Lordanos Abke - again another good diamond in the rough competition horse. Incredibly careful at the fences and smart to judge a distance. not licensed.
#54 Quaid I Stakkato - so different from #52. IMHO would be a VERY NICE riding horse, but I didn’t see much to impress me as a stallion. But it was a small clip.
#56 Quintender Embassy I - I think whoever bought him got a steal. His form was not perfect but he shows some scope. not licensed.
#75 Floriscount Lauries Crusador xx - so different from #74. much better walk. Would have liked to see him over fences.

I did not like many but these really caught my eye:
#52 Quaid I Calido - ugly legs over the fence.
#74 I did not like the walk but that trot was ground covering (kinda flat).

[QUOTE=Kyzteke;7242805]
…But it shocked Americans and the Europeans were like…“huh? what’s the bit deal?” Difference in values…[/QUOTE]

the difference is made up by functionality.
it doesn’t matter what they do with their feet while in “air phase”.
what matters is how the foot is positioned when they hit the ground.
thus:
watch them on hard ground from front or back and check the footing while hitting the ground. if it is plain forget about the paddling in airphase.
watch the stand on hard ground.
if they incorrectness is visible when standing streight it is an issue. paddeling than does make a negative difference since they will also hit the ground incorrect which might cause weaknesses/insoundess in due course.