I only saw it once because they’ve taken it off the replay, but I’m quite sure he specifically did not rotate. Obviously he definitely fell, and he was certainly on his way to rotating, but the clip gave as it should have and changed the trajectory of his fall such that he skidded onto the ground (albeit in a more crumpled sort of shape than would have been ideal) rather than his whole body going up and over. Much safer for the horse, MUCH safer for Phillip.
Apologies for the nitpicking. I believe it’s really important to discuss this, because the frangible tech is working, and it is saving horses and riders from far worse outcomes than they could have experienced. The tech sometimes gets a bad rap, but it is critical in the moments where it counts. Even the best riders in the world (Leslie Law, PD) can make mistakes that don’t deserve punishment beyond the day. This one could have been very bad.
I must admit that Singapore and his low blood percentage has made me nervous for years (he’s only about low 30s) - PD knows what he’s doing far better than I, of course, but I much prefer seeing him (and everyone) out on the more TB types. Glad we seem to be moving more back towards that way in horse selection. It was a great day for the blood horses!
You are thinking of the gates at Burghley where Buck had his fall with Jak - angled gates that I believe were part of the impetus for the design of the yellow MIM clip, which was designed to break with less pressure to accommodate the result of an angled approach. They’ve been a bit tricky for course designers to get right in the implementation following their debut this year, but they are an important tool in the box. Ian seems to have solved the problem of horses brushing over them by putting the yellow clipped corner in a ditch, which worked very well - for all that it was terrifying, not one unwarranted activation of a yellow clip today!