[QUOTE=D_BaldStockings;8345547]
I did mention that Garitchou was French AA, not TB x Arab.
However, the thread is about light horses as cross in sport, and this mare line is a clear and important line that from recent TB input - Jasmina’s dam Britt traces to Furioso XX, Fra Diavolo XX, Foudroyant II XX in 3 to 5 generations; Jasmina adds Ultimate XX and Orange Peel XX in 4th and 5th generation through her sire.
None of those TBs were ‘bred for’ Sport. I find the fact that so much Race TB blood, used every generation or every other generation, can produce direct and successful breeding offspring in Sport to be significant.
Jasmina’s daughter Pamela Des Pins, by Laudanum XX, also produced, though not so spectacularly.
Opaline produced well with a variety of sires from several bloodlines, this used to be called prepotence and be highly desired in a breeding animal…
…so DESPITE the ‘light horse saturation in the pedigree’ this is a very good bloodline for breeding.[/QUOTE]
You were right on Garichou. The only point I was trying to make in my post is that all “light horses” should not be placed in the same basket for the sake of this discussion. I think you will find no one to say that, above the “light type”, blood is not really important in modern sport horse breeding. However we should not limit the reflexion on “blood horse, good or bad”. The discussion would be more interesting if we were discussing which blood, how to bring it in and with an horizon of how many generations. To me, using a TB and using an AA is not necessarly equivalent, and is not equivalent with using a modern WB full of blood (and by that, I do not necessarly means with a lot of TB in its pedigree). Crossing with a TB in the hope of obtaining a sport horse is not the same as using a TB to produce a broodmare. TB stallions over a good dame line is not necessarily the equivalent of using a great stallion on a TB mare. We can also ask ourselves if the traditionnal TB is still the best way to introduce blood into our breeding program.