Ughh. As for jurisdiction, the usea told me it is the usef and fei. I am,just so disgusted by this. Thanks for posting the sponsors!
That first tack set-up is insane:
- double twisted wire gag with only a gag rein, no snaffle rein
- running martingale fitted on the gag rein
- lever noseband with the upper leather strap swapped out for a chain, adjusted low
I wonât comment on the ML event specifically, I think everything that could be said on the matter has at this point. However, I was, and still am of the opinion that any blood in the mouth, for any reason, should be automatic DQ.
Yes, accidents happen, and it would be heartbreaking to be eliminated for an unfortunate accident, but we have to always have the horseâs best interest at heart.
Iâm sure all of us have bit our tongue/lip at some point. If you have bitten it hard enough to bleed freely IT FâING HURTS. It is NOT in the horse or riderâs best interest to ask the horse to compete xc with an injury that could be distractingly painful regardless of whether or not that injury was caused by the rider. We do not ask horses to compete if they are slightly off due to a heel grab. This is no different with the exception that a horse doesnât limp if its face hurts.
Iâll totally admit to having a semi-irrational dislike of Marilyn. That said⊠itâs weird to me that she doesnât try to change any of the tack to find a configuration that doesnât make her horses bleed. Once I can forgive, maybe the flash rubbed on the bit funny and caught some skin (Iâve seen this happen⊠the tack was subsequently changed). But this many times?
I donât really agree that blood on the mouth needs to be an automatic elimination. I think the blood rule in dressage is a bit over the top and doesnât leave room for any nuance. I would certainly hope that a well trained ground jury would be able to speak with a vet and make an educated decision about blood found on the horse and rule accordingly.
One that also is not persuaded because of WHO the rider is, or who the rider rides with, or who the horses owners are.
my sentiments exactly. I donât care about Marilyn Little at all. I do totally think a horse who is bleeding at the mouth is done for the day, live to ride another day.
The only power we have to stand up to Marilyn Little is with our dollars. Stop buying from her sponsors until they drop her. Maybe then sheâll finally get the message and re-evaluate her methods. You can find a complete list of them here with links to their FB pages and websites: https://www.facebook.com/bobby.covington.7/posts/10214224849248391
I find the longer Iâm in the eventing community, the less star struck I am by the UL riders. Theyâre just another set of humans when youâre around them often enough!
But yes, that is definitely my hope. An impartial ground jury. Likely hard to find though.
Or someone who does realize who the rider is and says⊠âthis is your 10th bleeding horseâ⊠youâre done!
I thought BOTH the flash and the regular caveson appeared too tight. I wonder how Kitty managed to draw a full breath?
Iâm a bit appalled that 1) she was allowed to go onto XC with a supposed bleeding mouth. and 2) she herself made the decision - while apparently knowing she was under a microscope. I think any other rider may have said - not today. She either is FOS or knows she is untouchable.
There are three different accounts coming out now about what happened. 1 being the horse bit its lip. 2 being the horse grazed a warm up jump with its face before XC, and 3 being the horse hit its face on landing on course.
So which is it???
I used to be starstruck as well, until I became a groom. Really learned a lot in the barns⊠a lot about people and their horsemanship behind closed doors. Itâs all fluffy on social media, different behind closed doors.
@hldyrhrses completely agree
ok if that is the bit it is easy to how this would rip your horses mouth apart.
That looks like a Rutledge Roper gussied up to look english.
i would agree. With a third place result, sheâll be likely on the WEG team. Now would be a really good time to make a difference
As a one horse owner and 1/2 horse leaser, I am not a big ticket consumer, but I was all prepared to join the boycott of Bloody Marilynâs sponsors. Guess what? They are all too high end for me. Not a one that I have ever bought from directly. A few brands that I might consider buying used and one supplier of multiple products (Intrepid) that seem within the scope of folk of normal means. Oh well. I can write USE and FEI.
#notmynationalchampion
Good eye!
Amateur dressage rider here ⊠one of the reasons for the absolute ban on blood in dressage is the public perception of riding a bleeding horse as BAD.
Agree with all the comments on horse welfare here, just wanted to mention all the reasons âwhyâ blood can be acceptable do not cut it with the general public (who have little understanding of the sport but might like horses). The picture of Scandalous shown is a PR disaster - the mares bridle and martingale are all kinds of leather around her face and neck and a bunch of hardware in her mouth, the mouth is gaping and bloody.
I am aghast that the ground jury permitted this. And like others, it makes me want to turn away from the sport that I otherwise admire.
Especially doing the stand and yank on a horse with her mouth cranked shut with a part rope noseband.
The only one of MLâs sponsors that I use is MDC stirrups, which work really well for my bum foot. Bummer, but maybe by the time I need a new saddle, theyâll have dropped her as a sponsored rider. But a lot of her sponsors are too high end for me.