Maybe it is a little bit of a matter of semantics. The phrase “unlimited means” probably represents a significantly different number in the backwoods of North Carolina than in the horse world in Wellington. Or even Loxahatchee.
So somebody thinks JK shot his own daughter in order to frame MB?
That one sounds like a little bit of a stretch to me. Setting aside the likelihood of someone doing that in cold blood, it seems like a practical challenge to introduce a whole additional person on the scene who could’ve gotten in and out of there without anyone seeing him. Especially since the first officer on the scene showed up so soon after the 911 call.
I find it much more believable to think that the events unfolded very differently from the official version among the three people who were already there. And poor Rosie.
It certainly does not sound like such an arrangement would be affected by any physical limitations she might have. So the loss of income claim seems like a long shot, at best.
These naysayers should do a search on their name variations to learn the power of the internet.
As an x-HR manager, I can assure you finding data on people is a piece of cake unless it is government protected (IRS, DOJ, Social Security, DoD) or hidden behind major security (financial institutions).
All the finger pointing at those of us skilled at investigating and finding information needs to stop!!! Why do you care? Are you Lauren’s, or anyone else’s caretaker or hero? I have no doubt I’ve been searched ad nauseum. What a shame my life has been so mundane to not have criminal record or ask for donations for something my parents would have been delighted to gift me. You are just upset that the Kanarek family is a fountain of online records!!!
I recall that we have been told differing things. She was on a cruise and he was in Europe doing something. They were on a cruise together. She was hanging around the house while he was off in Europe. You get the idea.
Well, that might eliminate the question about JK shooting his own daughter. But it still seems like a pretty big plot twist to have an extra person there.
Although it might explain the urgency of JK/RG removing the cameras the next day while LK was still in the hospital. For that task, you might need two people, instead of just one person to stop in to grab the dog, if she was left there the previous day.
If only the police had bothered to grab the cameras themselves while there were 40-60 officers milling around right there at the crime scene.
Well- I guess it could explain away her financial situation if she had a specific substantial windfall of cash.
But I’m curious about the 7 years ago thing because of the taxes involved. If she actually won the lottery, she would have to declare it and pay significant taxes on the winnings.
If the windfall of cash came from an alternative source… that might be different. If it was within the last 7 years… she could be opening herself up to tax scrutiny. Which might be fine, if everything about the windfall of cash was legal, and she paid all applicable taxes.
But… maybe she doesn’t want extra scrutiny on her finances. If not… that might be challenging for her as the civil litigation drags on…
We had a case in my area a while back where a person was murdered and one of the suspects was supposedly out of town when it happened. They even had someone take their cell phone prior to the event so it would ping to show location.
As part of the investigation many of the public and some private cameras and were reviewed and the person was caught on camera near the scene where the murder took place.
It is a bit creepy to think how many times you are filmed as you go about your day.