MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[StB.YM]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m saying that if you find extensive “research” into someone’s “digital footprint” disgusting and nasty when LK does it, just be consistent when @LexInVA or @Sdel do the same thing.

Your friend recommended everyone look stuff up for themselves, which is what @LexInVA did. Perhaps take your criticisms up with @hut-ho78 instead.

@hut-ho78

I said I’m overqualified for discussions here on this forum because I can read and look stuff up for myself which is what I recommend others do.

[Warmblood1]

@ekat

@Warmblood1

Did it state what the drug was in the drug possession charge? Military MIGHT waive a misdemeanor marijuana pipe charge.

https://portal.njcourts.gov/webe41/MPAWeb/index.jsp

It just says poss cds/analog - schd i ii iii

If you search by his name, you have to add his middle initial and DOB, (02/26/1977 - it’s been in several online articles). There’s too many records, otherwise. poss cds/analog - schd i ii iii

When you click on any of his six pages of records, you can open it and read original charges, what he pled to, etc.

Thank you! This finally allows me to put his potential service together.

If his birthday is Feb of 77’, then he would have been 18 in 1995 if I’m counting right. His earliest charge was 1995, which was the marijuana charge and paraphernalia charge. He could have possibly gotten a waiver to still enlist with it being a pipe and marijuana.

There is a charge that isn’t named in 1996 which is weird but doesn’t say what it was.

There is a simple assault charge earlier in 1997 but it also states it’s disorderly conduct and disturbance of private property so not sure if it was an actual assault charge. There is a later charge of simple assault again in 1997 and resisting arrest. He would have been MJP’ed with those charges and discharged from military service with those 3 charges in 1997 if he were enlisted.

So the only way RG would have served any time in the military is if he got a waiver when he turned 18 in 95’ and then discharged in possibly 96’ with the unnamed charge, no later than 97’ IF he did actually make it through boot camp.

[StB.YM]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Please elaborate.

It seems a violation of the civil rights of a 16 year old male to be treated differently from a 16 year of female for the same offense.

This is why I don’t bow down to “legal professionals”. They sometimes come out with absurd statements like a male is a minor until age 16, while a female is a minor until age 18.

Do a simple google search of a state of your choice and look at news reports or court records of juveniles who are tried as adults. It happens. Sometimes it happens far too frequently. This is well recorded. Your ignorance at the matter is not an excuse for calling other peoples statements of known events “absurd”.

[eggbutt]

There is a 15 year old boy who just killed 5 people in NC who is being charged as an adult if he survives his injuries.

[LexInVA]

@Warmblood1

@ekat

@Warmblood1

Did it state what the drug was in the drug possession charge? Military MIGHT waive a misdemeanor marijuana pipe charge.

https://portal.njcourts.gov/webe41/MPAWeb/index.jsp

It just says poss cds/analog - schd i ii iii

If you search by his name, you have to add his middle initial and DOB, (02/26/1977 - it’s been in several online articles). There’s too many records, otherwise. poss cds/analog - schd i ii iii

When you click on any of his six pages of records, you can open it and read original charges, what he pled to, etc.

Thank you! This finally allows me to put his potential service together.

If his birthday is Feb of 77’, then he would have been 18 in 1995 if I’m counting right. His earliest charge was 1995, which was the marijuana charge and paraphernalia charge. He could have possibly gotten a waiver to still enlist with it being a pipe and marijuana.

There is a charge that isn’t named in 1996 which is weird but doesn’t say what it was.

There is a simple assault charge earlier in 1997 but it also states it’s disorderly conduct and disturbance of private property so not sure if it was an actual assault charge. There is a later charge of simple assault again in 1997 and resisting arrest. He would have been MJP’ed with those charges and discharged from military service with those 3 charges in 1997 if he were enlisted.

So the only way RG would have served any time in the military is if he got a waiver when he turned 18 in 95’ and then discharged in possibly 96’ with the unnamed charge, no later than 97’ IF he did actually make it through boot camp.

He got the charges toned down, so the break-in and burglary turned attempted robbery and assault of the ex-girlfriend was down-graded to disturbing the peace. His last year in HS was 96 and the break-in was in May of 97.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

“Over 16 for a male is normally an adult”?

What does being a male have to do with it?

Some states such as mine differentiate between male and female ages for certain teenage court filings. Usually it’s a one year difference.

Please elaborate.

It seems a violation of the civil rights of a 16 year old male to be treated differently from a 16 year of female for the same offense.

This is why I don’t bow down to “legal professionals”. They sometimes come out with absurd statements like a male is a minor until age 16, while a female is a minor until age 18.

Look it up yourself.

And that’s not what I said. I said males and females are sometimes CHARGED differently at certain ages.

I’m sure someone as versed as you in legal research could do a much better job than I.

[eggbutt]

And he would have had to have legal help to get those charges reduced.

Such a lengthy pattern of behavior.

[Warmblood1]

In civilian court. The Marine Corps uses the UCMJ which is the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Their proceedings and decisions are different than what would be ruled in civilian court. He would have been punished both as a civilian and as a Marine. He would have been MJP’ed for violent offenses in the USMC.

[Omgitsme]

Omg I didn’t even notice that typo

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@StB.YM

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m saying that if you find extensive “research” into someone’s “digital footprint” disgusting and nasty when LK does it, just be consistent when @LexInVA or @Sdel do the same thing.

Your friend recommended everyone look stuff up for themselves, which is what @LexInVA did. Perhaps take your criticisms up with @hut-ho78 instead.

@hut-ho78

I said I’m overqualified for discussions here on this forum because I can read and look stuff up for myself which is what I recommend others do.

I’m not LK. I don’t know LK in real life.

I believe she answered an interrogatory about her SM posting by saying that to the extent the posts existed, they were available online.

I do not believe that she ever encouraged the “research” into her past, or into RG, or her parents, or her sisters.

Hut Ho was referring to looking up information on laws for the purpose of an informed discussion, not looking up personal information for the purpose of smearing someone. Duh. Obvs.

[Omgitsme]

I assumed CH meant following as in going on platforms specifically to find LK.

[Sdel]

@LexInVA

TBH, I’ve seen other male Goodwins that he does greatly resemble in passing, so I don’t think there’s necessarily anything with JK there, but given how NJ is, it’s anyone’s guess without some DNA tests.

As my husband often says, “Mama’s baby, Daddy’s maybe.”

[OntheFnce]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@Warmblood1

@LexInVA

@eggbutt

Sept 2001 and May 1997, right? Yeah, the US Marine Corp didn’t need men like him.

I also confirmed that he has service disqualifying charges going back to 1995.

Hang on, how is this possible? Wouldn’t he have been 18 in 1996? Juvenile records can be expunged and are not necessarily disqualifying.

Also, he could have charges but not have been convicted and that wouldn’t have disqualified him for service either.

His charges were not juvenile ones. They were adult charges. 18 can be adult or youthful offender but over 16 for a male is normally adult.

“Over 16 for a male is normally an adult”?

What does being a male have to do with it?

Should Juveniles Be Charged as Adults in the Criminal Justice System?

[Omgitsme]

I completely missed that typo but honestly I think it worked out well.

[trubandloki]

@Omgitsme

I completely missed that typo but honestly I think it worked out well.

It works out wonderfully!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

“Over 16 for a male is normally an adult”?

What does being a male have to do with it?

Some states such as mine differentiate between male and female ages for certain teenage court filings. Usually it’s a one year difference.

Please elaborate.

It seems a violation of the civil rights of a 16 year old male to be treated differently from a 16 year of female for the same offense.

This is why I don’t bow down to “legal professionals”. They sometimes come out with absurd statements like a male is a minor until age 16, while a female is a minor until age 18.

Look it up yourself.

And that’s not what I said. I said males and females are sometimes CHARGED differently at certain ages.

I’m sure someone as versed as you in legal research could do a much better job than I.

It’s too absurd for me to waste time “looking it up myself”. LOL

It would be a hideous violation of the idea of equality under the law for males and females to be “charged differently at certain ages”.

But go ahead and double down on your ridiculous statement.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@StB.YM

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m saying that if you find extensive “research” into someone’s “digital footprint” disgusting and nasty when LK does it, just be consistent when @LexInVA or @Sdel do the same thing.

Your friend recommended everyone look stuff up for themselves, which is what @LexInVA did. Perhaps take your criticisms up with @hut-ho78 instead.

@hut-ho78

I said I’m overqualified for discussions here on this forum because I can read and look stuff up for myself which is what I recommend others do.

I’m not LK. I don’t know LK in real life.

I believe she answered an interrogatory about her SM posting by saying that to the extent the posts existed, they were available online.

I do not believe that she ever encouraged the “research” into her past, or into RG, or her parents, or her sisters.

Hut Ho was referring to looking up information on laws for the purpose of an informed discussion, not looking up personal information for the purpose of smearing someone. Duh. Obvs.

She said that in response for a subpoena duces tecum which is not a satisfactory or appropriate response. It can be considered non compliance.

[StB.YM]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m not LK. I don’t know LK in real life.

I believe she answered an interrogatory about her SM posting by saying that to the extent the posts existed, they were available online.

I do not believe that she ever encouraged the “research” into her past, or into RG, or her parents, or her sisters.

When did I mention LK in my statement? Interesting that you immediately thought I meant LK as your friend - I was referring to @hut-ho78, as can be discerned from my subsequent quote of their post.

@CurrentlyHorseless

Duh. Obvs.

RG was part of a very public trial, that was streamed by a major channel - Law and Crime. ETA “The existence of” His past record was brought up during that trial. It was discussed on this forum - therefore it falls within the bounds of the statement made by @hut-ho78.

@hut-ho78

I said I’m overqualified for discussions here on this forum because I can read and look stuff up for myself which is what I recommend others do.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

“Over 16 for a male is normally an adult”?

What does being a male have to do with it?

Some states such as mine differentiate between male and female ages for certain teenage court filings. Usually it’s a one year difference.

Please elaborate.

It seems a violation of the civil rights of a 16 year old male to be treated differently from a 16 year of female for the same offense.

This is why I don’t bow down to “legal professionals”. They sometimes come out with absurd statements like a male is a minor until age 16, while a female is a minor until age 18.

Look it up yourself.

And that’s not what I said. I said males and females are sometimes CHARGED differently at certain ages.

I’m sure someone as versed as you in legal research could do a much better job than I.

It’s too absurd for me to waste time “looking it up myself”. LOL

It would be a hideous violation of the idea of equality under the law for males and females to be “charged differently at certain ages”.

But go ahead and double down on your ridiculous statement.

I did not create the system but accurately reported on what I’ve seen in application.

Accept it, don’t accept it, clutch your pearls with feigned outrage, it matters not to me. To me it’s nothing but further evidence of your bias blinding you.

Or you don’t know how to look it up.

[MorganSercu]

Pretty funny to see someone not only defending a career criminal, active drug addict and with a history of assaulting women - but to defend the honor of his female associate whose own actions are awful.

Their characters (and legal entanglements) are being made known far & wide.

If you want either or both in your circle of friends, or anywhere near those you care about - then you and your character stinks too.

And just wait until the civil trial when each and every single bit is discussed at length and on the public record.