MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[Knights_Mom]

@LilRanger

@eggbutt

will additional charges be forthcoming if the district attorney hasn’t been tainted?

It would take a DA with nothing to lose to charge a former victim with a crime based on the same set of facts that they’d used to charge the current victim.

Are DAs elected there? Because if they are and it’s proven Schellhirn got this famous case all wrong anyone running against him has quite the talking point.

[BatCoach]

Fair enough. Different experiences.

[Warmblood1]

Thanks for posting, @ekat!

I found these two addendums interesting:

Is MB re-establishing his position as “landlord?” Perhaps showing he stayed there for brief periods and that SGF may perhaps be the more appropriate “landlord?”

I wonder how they are going to approach this by stating LK was unlawfully on the property. Was it verified in the criminal trial by the fire marshall that they were in fact permitted back on the property? Maybe the unlawful presence isn’t related to the FM or notices.

[ekat]

@Warmblood1

Was it verified in the criminal trial by the fire marshall that they were in fact permitted back on the property? Maybe the unlawful presence isn’t related to the FM or notices.

The fire Marshall said at the criminal trial that he verified that LK had fixed the smoke detector by EMAIL, and gave her permission pending an in-person inspection. And failed to tell MB.

My gut tells me the allegation of her illegal presence goes deeper than that though.

[Knights_Mom]

@ekat

@Warmblood1

Was it verified in the criminal trial by the fire marshall that they were in fact permitted back on the property? Maybe the unlawful presence isn’t related to the FM or notices.

The fire Marshall said at the criminal trial that he verified that LK had fixed the smoke detector by EMAIL, and gave her permission pending an in-person inspection. And failed to tell MB.

My gut tells me the allegation of her illegal presence goes deeper than that though.

There may be something regarding notices to evict in cases of tenants engaging in illegal activities. Maybe the verbal demands to vacate are sufficient in this regard? Maybe a written notice had time, like 24 hours to be in effect?

[ekat]

@Warmblood1

Is MB re-establishing his position as “landlord?” Perhaps showing he stayed there for brief periods and that SGF may perhaps be the more appropriate “landlord?”

I don’t think so. He would have amended the cross-claim to SGF if that were the case, I would think. Plus, he was part of SGF, so that doesn’t make sense in my head. I am not really sure what that’s leading to.

[Sdel]

@Knights_Mom

@ekat

@Warmblood1

Was it verified in the criminal trial by the fire marshall that they were in fact permitted back on the property? Maybe the unlawful presence isn’t related to the FM or notices.

The fire Marshall said at the criminal trial that he verified that LK had fixed the smoke detector by EMAIL, and gave her permission pending an in-person inspection. And failed to tell MB.

My gut tells me the allegation of her illegal presence goes deeper than that though.

There may be something regarding notices to evict in cases of tenants engaging in illegal activities. Maybe the verbal demands to vacate are sufficient in this regard?

Maybe something with fraudulent documents?

[ekat]

@Knights_Mom

There may be something regarding notices to evict in cases of tenants engaging in illegal activities. Maybe the verbal demands to vacate are sufficient in this regard? Maybe a written notice had time, like 24 hours to be in effect?

You make a good point. We don’t actually know what that email from Mr Tarshis said other than they were to vacate by the 7th (per my notes of Mr Tarshis’s testimony.)

[Knights_Mom]

Maybe the fire marshal saying ok was one thing but another agency like a building department still mandated vacatur?

[ekat]

@Knights_Mom

Maybe the fire marshal saying ok was one thing but another agency like a building department still mandated vacatur?

Also a good point.

SGF has taken the position since the beginning that she was there illegally. So, there is something there for sure when two of the three defendants are saying it.

[Knights_Mom]

@ekat

@Knights_Mom

Maybe the fire marshal saying ok was one thing but another agency like a building department still mandated vacatur?

Also a good point.

SGF has taken the position since the beginning that she was there illegally. So, there is something there for sure when two of the three defendants are saying it.

But the reason behind the occupancy may differ from SGF to MB. To SGF it wasn’t a rental property and they did not sign a rental contract or lease as majority/minor owners. For MBs part he permitted them staying but it was a temporary thing, not intending them as renters per se and to the State occupancy longer than 30 days established tenancy rights as far as getting them to vacate.

[Knights_Mom]

To me, technically they were more like roommates that wouldn’t leave. House guests actually.

[ekat]

@Knights_Mom

me, technically they were more like roommates that wouldn’t leave. House guests actually.

I think you’re right.

[Fiesta01]

@MHM

If, in fact, the camera was actually turned off.

I think it wasn’t turned off. RJ told Heymer he had it all on video/tape/whatever term he used. Hence the trip by JK and RG the next day to confiscate it. I think JK knew whatever was recorded wasn’t going to support the story they wanted to present for their big payday.

[Knights_Mom]

JK was super invested in making sure that was done I notice. He didn’t just trust RG to do it. I bet JK took any evidence with him too if that scenario is true.

[Fiesta01]

Nothing you are saying or doing resembles the objectionable behavior that others were commenting on. We’re proud of you for being proud. Honest. It isn’t always the easiest thing in our society. There are quite a few of our fellow citizens (not referring to COTHers here) who are very anti-military, usually based on no personal or familial experience. Please keep being you.

[MHM]

@Knights_Mom

To me, technically they were more like roommates that wouldn’t leave. House guests actually.

And as we know from extensive history here on the BB, houseguests can be the worst.

[Jenerationx]

Here’s a particularly young man charged as an adult. Eric Smith, Steuben County, NY tortured and murdered a 4 year old when he was 13 in 1993. He was tried as an adult and served 27 years. He was released in February 2022.

So, you can take your “absurd statement” and pearl clutching elsewhere. Many, many, many teenage boys are tried as adults.

@CurrentlyHorseless

It’s too absurd for me to waste time “looking it up myself”. LOL

It would be a hideous violation of the idea of equality under the law for males and females to be “charged differently at certain ages”.

But go ahead and double down on your ridiculous statement.

It happens all over the country. Especially if the crime is particularly violent. If you’re ignorant to this fact, you’re not paying attention to our legal system.

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m explaining that’s it’s nutty statements like that that cause me to discount what you post. I don’t doubt that you have decades of service as a court professional.

Your statement that these true statements are “nutty” are… well, nutty.

[Fiesta01]

@anon6923113

Last thing. LK is entitled to zero military discounts

Ha! And I was beginning to think that’s how she had 4-5 horses at MB’s and was only paying 5K. MB must have a great military discount. /s

[Jenerationx]

Oh look… there’s that pesky one party state issue with audio recordings. Thank you for posting this. It confirms everything I said about those recordings previously. Ya know, that it is not legal to just plop a recorder down and record audio of conversations where NO PARTY has agreed to be recorded.