So, I was unable to click traffic lights and such today. And…I did not get a boat.
BUT, I just checked now and…
Mr Deininger filed an amended answer and counterclaim today. The changes are in red. Counterclaim #4 is new.
I’m adding it, and the original to the OP (and update the title.)
Enjoy.
MB Amended Answer and Counter.pdf (6.9 MB)
I’m surprised he didn’t just file the motion without asking for leave. Could it be because time to answer has passed? I can see to amend the complaint given service and all.
That would be my guess.
Interesting….a plot to injure, among other things, Michael’s physical well-being.
What was admitted before that is now being denied?
This is insanely interesting. Thanks for sharing.
This is also extremely interesting. Thanks. CH trying to discredit you or any experienced in the field of law is very LK-esque. LK loved to belittle law professionals on the thread despite having absolutely no qualifications to do so. But I’m sure you already knew that.
You’re welcome 
. The traffic lights weren’t that bad tonight, luckily!
It is always nice when traffic is light!
Ok I get it and it’s rather ironic.
It seems just like LK had planned to use a criminal trial verdict of guilty for her Civil case, MB is instead using the verdict of NGRI for his civil case to not only absolve him of culpability to injuring LK but to instead assert that LK drove him to that very state of insanity.
It’s also languaged in such a way to allow for further modification in the charges section using terns like blackmail. (That’s coercion and that can be used to bind further defendants who are aligned with LK. And with 3 people acting in concert that can lead to further serious consequences).
It seems EB was added as a trial attorney as well given that is in red.
The illegal recordings and surveillance admitted in court is now also included in a much more profound way. This now binds RG to the plot as well but that binding is of yet unspoken here. But given his testimony of placing the devices, he is now implicated as a 2nd conspirator, though that’s not specified.
Adding language that physical assault upon MB was planned is also new and promises to even more heavily suggest a plot with multiple co-conspirators. Who knows maybe that tweet I spoke of earlier is right?!
In other jurisdictions if such a thing is proven in court it could potentially lead to criminal charges of those co-conspirators. But this jurisdiction conducts itself poorly.
Giving the recordings to ShellyBellyNelly AND KK also now involves them into the mix and counts as Distribution of illegally obtained recordings.
“Caused the recordings to be placed” will implicate RG as the person who did the placing. That’s acting in concert.
The papers also assert that there is proof LK was aware of MBs mental and emotional decline and failed to stop adding to the distress.
Just wow.
My thoughts exactly. All of the red = wow.
We all said there would be much more shown about a conspiracy! Ding-ding-ding! I can’t wait for the names to be named!!
I wonder what Friday will bring?
You won’t look it up because then you will be proven wrong. Talk about absurd.
What was the point of this tangent? Oh yes, that Good Guy Goodwin has a lengthy criminal record of violent assaults in multiple states, as well as inappropriate behaviour towards minor girls. But he and LK want us to believe that MB was the aggressor in their altercation and that he was the one putting minors at risk? That’s funny.
If only I were an attorney so I could understand it all!
Logic passed this one over. She has real difficulty seeing the obvious. But I doubt she would allow her children be in the presence of either LK or RG.
Yeah but when I’ve mentioned it and expanded to the possibilities I’m sure many thought I was nuts.
Me too…what was it, I hate and I’m obsessive and making things up?
Now, I really ask the question, will additional charges be forthcoming if the district attorney hasn’t been tainted?
Basically it was because you were a b**** according to them.
Yep! My middle name.
Depositions should really be fun! Oh, to be a fly on the wall.
Even if the Kanareks cut their losses, Michael can pursue with vigor for all he’s listed in this amendment, right?
It would take a DA with nothing to lose to charge a former victim with a crime based on the same set of facts that they’d used to charge the current victim.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
