She is talking out of both sides of her mouth (no surprise there). On one hand, she is claiming MB got the gun out the safe. On the other hand, she was saying the gun was missing. So which is it?
(And why wasn’t that particular taunt mentioned at the trial? Had it been ruled out during evidentiary hearings?)
CPS was telling WHO the nature of the complaint? I thought MB wasn’t part of the CPS interview and stepped in later to ask them to leave the office. ???
I’d be very curious to know from the defense attorneys when this is all over, what their opinion of this forum about the case was. It’s pretty amazing to me to see the processing power of these threads.
Yes, I am beginning to wonder if that is what actually happened. MB arrives at the house and asks about the gun, LK comes out with it (likely waving it around and taunting him), ED calls about that time, Rosie manages to get out and attack MB, LK and RG try to grab Rosie but LK gets close enough to MB that he tries to get the gun away from her and it discharges while they are grappling for it. I can also imagine a scenario where Rosie knocks LK down or off balance while launching for MB - and the gun either discharges then (she shot herself when she fell), or MB went for the gun and it discharged in the scuffle.
I will never be convinced the incident went down the way two lying drug addict grifters say it did.
There are a lot of things I would bet on the fact the incident did not happen any where near the way the two lying addicted grifters and her father would like us to believe it happened.
She said she recorded it in her taunt to RC. That her recorder could still hear their whispers. I also testimony about the dryer was suspicious. She made a point to mention RC was already asleep…so she was in the barn late. I thought at the time the texts seemed to be about seeing if seeing the people in the club house were asleep more than about getting a response about a dryer. It would be interesting to know about the time stamp on those…
Even though it has been discussed many times, it’s still incredible to think that the situation had devolved to the point where there were people sleeping in the barn aisle in front of their stalls or in the lounge like a flophouse due to the situation there at the time. And then it got even worse when they got booted out of the barn and onto the patio.
Darn you judicial system, we just want answers to the civil suit filings that are out there.
I mean, the whole thread is about the civil case that Lauren Kanarek filed and how the Kanarek family is not playing nice with the court system in the case that they filed! I would guess the judge finds it frustrating to have to deal with these games.
Lauren Kanarek is refusing to sit for a deposition in the case she filed. That is unheard of. She is claiming covid fears all while not showing any fear of Covid anywhere else in her life, including parties after the verdict, meeting up with strangers at their barn to film her 48 hours episode, etc. But somehow Covid is a risk for a deposition… weird. I am sure the law firm uses Clorox wipes on the conference room table and has a box of those free masks.
Waiting for the judge to decide if she has to travel to where she filed the case to give a deposition.
Lauren’s father, who clearly is waist deep in Lauren’s life happenings, who happens to also have a law degree and passed the bar in NJ posted here about this case regularly as @Inigo-montoya, complete with some lie filled name calling posts full of defamatory comments. Jonathan Kanarek, the lawyer father, refused to answer his deposition in the civil case that his daughter filed. So strange that someone who is a lawyer would do that. So strange that someone who is a lawyer would have so little respect for the courts that they would be willing to got that route. There is now a contempt filing against Jonathan Kanarek because of this. Then the lawyer father has the lawyer that does not represent him file an order to quash the subpoena and limit the discovery, while saying here that it was a lawyer mistake that they had complied, he wanted to comply, he would gladly sit for a deposition.
They being Lawyer father and the mother of Lauren, Kirby Kanarek. Kirby posts here at @Seeker1. Kirby bragged here about transcribing all of the recordings and joined Lauren in boasting about all the places those transcriptions have been sent. She told us how they had so much information about the case, and how they were full of game changer stuff. Kirby Kanarek ignored the subpoena requesting those transcriptions that she bragged about having. I guess if her lawyer husband was not going to answer his subpoena he forgot to advise her to answer her subpoena. And yet another contempt filing for the Kanarek family. The lawyer that does not represent Kirby, but represents Lauren filed to have this contempt filing quashed and the discovery limited.
Oh, I almost forgot one of the best things. Jonathan Kanarek - in case you had forgotten - the lawyer father of Luaren Kanarek decided to forget even more things he learned in law school (because answering a subpoena is pretty basic stuff) and the school of court common sense and sent a private note to the judge directly. Not thru his not lawyer (aka the lawyer representing his daughter but filing things for Jonathan Kanarek), but right to the judge. Who does that?
Some other things filed that are fun - Lauren’s lawyer thinks it is highly burdensome to ask anyone but Lauren for discovery and people should just ask her, forgetting that she had previously answered that she did not have the information and that they had to find it themselves. Lauren’s lawyer also thinks that requesting the contents of phones is overly intrusive because the defense will get - gasp - shopping lists.
Yes. She started the rant by saying RC allowed MB to use her gun for the shooting (because she was involved in “the plot”). Then about halfway down she said it was negligent at best to allow the gun to go missing and endanger 12 year olds (MHG’s kid was 12).
If it was planned for MB to use the gun….then it certainly wasn’t “missing”. And now we also know that the 12 year old that was being “endangered” wasn’t even on the farm and LLK should have been aware of that.