MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[Angela_Freda]

@Sdel

It makes me wonder what exactly was on their shopping list

Indeed

[Christa_P]

This is just my experience, but when I was on a jury this spring we had access to ALL the texts that were downloaded from the phones. Only some of it was actually presented as specific evidence during the trial, but everything downloaded from the phones was admitted into evidence and we could look at the printouts during deliberations including personal texts.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@erinmeri

Hey, ignored posters who insist on pushing ridiculous narratives… I am just getting caught up, but SGF has some awfully interesting things to say in their filings. So, Lauren says “send discovery requests”, and they do, and she refused? That seems to be what I am getting from this. What say you? HOW IS THAT NORMAL?

Classic @erinmeri. Taunting the posters she claims to ignore.

Did you read her answers to the interrogatories?

She was asked for “documents” in her possession on subject A.B, C. She answered “not in my possession”.

Now that they’re asking for the contents of the phone from MCPO, she may have objections.

You do understand that the lawyer from each opposing side points the picture form their ride as dramatically as possible, don’t you? You understand that that’s normal?

[Christa_P]

@Angela_Freda

@Sdel

It makes me wonder what exactly was on their shopping list

Indeed

The defendant we convicted managed his drug deals through text messages. Not saying this is the case here.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@3PonyFarm

I am curious what the attorney for RC strategy will be. Maybe just waiting to see what happens with the various rulings and how the case progresses.

I wonder how much more RG will put up with. Seriously, what’s in this for him? He thought he was getting $50,000 from Michael but LK stopped that. All hell broke loose on August 7 and he scrambled to come up with “the story” and thankfully no forensic evidence was gathered…what a lucky break. Then the giant payday fell through when Michael refused the deal and was acquitted. The lawsuit seems to be sinking quickly. What does he have to look forward to now?

I don’t understand this logic. How did MB refusing the plea deal and being found NGRI affect a “huge payday” for RG?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@LilRanger

@3PonyFarm

I am curious what the attorney for RC strategy will be. Maybe just waiting to see what happens with the various rulings and how the case progresses.

When the poo starts flying and you’re not a source of it, lay low and look for opportunities to get yourself dismissed.

How can RC possibly get herself dismissed from the suit? She furnished the gun. I think we’re not hearing from her lawyers because there’s not any wiggle room in her position. She brought the gun and she’s admitted it.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I don’t understand this logic. How did MB refusing the plea deal and being found NGRI affect a “huge payday” for RG?

So you don’t believe RG expected a share of the multi-million $ settlement they expected if MB was convicted?

Again, not sure how/why your post appeared for me even with the Ignore function

[lazaret]

It’s apparent to everyone that they expected a guilty verdict and therefore a slam dunk on culpability and an insurance payout to settle the civil suit.

Now that it’s become clear that the parties involved intend to fight, suddenly there’s threats to report “backers” to the IRS, “bombshell” evidence, it’s all scare tactics to try to force a settlement.

Anyone who has been around civil litigation for any length of time has seen it all before.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Fiesta01

@Sdel

Considering that JK has obviously contacted Sceusi ex-parte in this case, I assume he must have also done so in the police suit and the criminal case. The outcomes from those contacts may be fabricated, but it does seem that JK has indeed contacted these judges. And by extension it would seem he also had probably contacted AK’s board and they are the ones who put in that footnote that Judge Taylor used to justify holding Michael.

Is there nothing Mr. B can do to bring these inappropriate contacts to the appropriate authorities to get an immediate re-look at the decision to keep MB imprisoned? Yes, I know he is not in prison, but at this point, I don’t see a difference.

There is zero evidence that JK “contacted AKs board” to influence the Krol hearing.

That’s just the type of thing @Sdel makes up to explain why institution decisions don’t go the way she wanted.

She also claimed that JK got the judge to dismiss MBs civil suit by using private communication to dispute the truth of the allegations. That doesn’t even make sense because the suit was dismissed on based on reasons other than the truth or falsity of the allegations.

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

She also claimed that JK got the judge to dismiss MBs civil suit by using private communication to dispute the truth of the allegations. That doesn’t even make sense because the suit was dismissed on based on reasons other than the truth or falsity of the allegations.

I guess not reading LK’s SM extends to even when it’s posted on CotH for all to see…

[CanteringCarrot]

My my, CH, you’ve certainly gotten petty. You alright?

[Kitty64]

I was thinking about RC today, and if anyone was to get dropped from the case it seems it would be her. She did her due diligence and gave her gun to someone to put it in the gun safe. She didn’t leave it in the car or have it under her pillow.

I don’t fault anyone for traveling with a gun as she did to protect herself if needed.

[EADoug]

There was so much lovely educational legal talk… then blast - verdict definition! accusations! crap flying against a wall!

Predictable and disappointing.

[CanteringCarrot]

You’ve just got to ignore it. Or say ridiculous things to them because they are also ridiculous

It has become abundantly clear what some posters are here for and what type of character they posses. This was made very clear to me recently. Not worth your time.

It’s fine to argue different views and sides, but that’s not what this is

[Omgitsme]

Can they claim privilege at this point? JK has made no mention to the court of being LK’s attorney. A conversation is not privileged unless the lawyer establishes the counsel/client privilege, no?

ETA: essentially what I’m seeing is that they’re trying to claim attorney/client privilege simply because JK is a lawyer. Conversation with an attorney is not privileged if they attorney is not the person’s counsel, correct?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@hut-ho78

he was proven in a court of law to have committed dangerous acts which would otherwise have been a crime

Nope, nothing was proven in court. If any criminal action had been proven he would have been found guilty by the insane jury.

The jury found actus reus was committed, but it was not a crime because mens rea was not present. NGRI.

Everyone understands this.

[hut-ho78]

@DownYonder

@BigMama1

The conversation was so productive when nobody was responding to a couple of particular posters…

@Maria

Don’t do it. Don’t do it. Tempting though it may be. I know, I know, itchy finger syndrome. Please don’t do it. Not worth it.

And of course they are trying to divert the discussion away from recent developments and onto that old tired issue of what the verdict meant. Not falling for it…

That is a figment if your imagination. I am not a Kanarek or affiliated with the same. I had replied to Eggbutt who was denying the verdict from the criminal trial. You know the verdict, the one the self proclaimed legal experts on this forum keep misrepresenting except it’s online so anyone can read it.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

There is zero evidence that JK “contacted AKs board” to influence the Krol hearing.

Bless your heart…NOW you want evidence. But you cling to RG’s version of events despite no evidence whatsoever!

[Joanne]

@Fiesta01

Also, if LK does have Judge T.'s notes, can that be brought into the civil trial to illustrate the “lowness” to which LK will go to FTB?

Building on the above question: If true, could they ask her how she obtained those notes? Did the judge just offer them up to her or did her daddy ask Taylor for them?

[Sdel]

So, who wants to start a pool on if the cat litter picture is on one of the phones?