MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

I still wondering if collateral estoppel will be raised to bar the re-litigation of whether MB shot LK. since the burden of proof is higher in the criminal case. Hopefully they will resolve this and I will never know.

Where are the pictures??? I demand pictures!!!

3 Likes

LK mentioned it once when she was talking about the remodel job RG was doing. Lying on SM aside….

But, I do wonder. It has been niggling at the back of my mind for a few days. Was it not Mr. Silver who said that attorney-client privilege can not cover criminal acts? We have assumed that meant the recordings, but forging signatures and documents (as mentioned in the criminal trial) is also a criminal act, and probably a lot more relevant for SGF than the recordings made against Barisone. I wonder if it is possible that JK presented SGF with some questionable documents in an attempt to keep LK on the farm at some point after the shooting……

ETA: pre-shooting LK was very vocal about her agreements being in writing.

14 Likes

I’m 400 posts behind, has anything happened or can I just pick up from here?

4 Likes

Unless you want a recipe for hot buttered rum that looks fabulous, you’re good from here.

13 Likes

:+1: Thanks!

2 Likes

I wonder if there is a setting on the BB so that you would only get alerts when there are relevant posts or recipes. That would be extra fabulous.

8 Likes

That would be called the ignore feature. Flawed as it is, by using it one is theoretically only getting relevant information.

5 Likes

Yes, I just wish it worked a little better. I keep seeing posts from people I have on ignore.

3 Likes

Sadly, not anything of any merit! Same old song and dance by two particular posters.

I still want to know which one of you hoodlums said their names three times to rouse them again! Fess up- who did this???

18 Likes

And yet another implausible yet imaginative theory.

LOL! And yet another implausible scenario.

Hey, @CurrentlyHorseless. I have a question… was your abhorrent victim blaming behavior on the Ebeling thread part of your 1) endeavor to represent a “minority opinion”, or 2) something else you would care to explain? Seems you only advocate for certain types of victims.

Edited to erase an errant g.

30 Likes

You too, @hut-ho78!

10 Likes

What I find implausible is that two people would find such glee in being nasty, and yet here we are. It’s not just this thread. I have receipts and would like said posters to be explain themselves. Please and thanks.

21 Likes

Yuk, I don’t want flour or baking powder in my rum!

1 Like

These two posters both attacked a minor child who is allegedly a victim of sexual assault. I just can’t.

29 Likes

Almost correct. It was twice. She flatlined at least twice. There were several surgeries. Yet you continue to make light of her injured. Who does that?

So, out of curiosity, why are you so strident when it comes to Lauren Kanarek, but so nasty when it comes to other victims, specifically the Ebeling one?

29 Likes

Will take one tomorrow as soon as I clean it lol. Just got back from a week away looking after my mom and let’s just say my husband and teenage daughter didn’t go out of their way to get the house shipshape before I arrived. I found and cleaned up 4 different spots of dog pee from 3 different dogs (yes in my brand new hickory floors) before I even took my shoes off. Not the homecoming I had in mind… :japanese_ogre:

8 Likes