I did read it and the part that matters here is the part that you are ignoring. The steps do exist, yes. But they exist in the frame work of the required hearings. And it VERY clearly says that the first hearing has to be within Three Months! To schedule the first hearing in six months is blatantly ignoring the requirements. Period.
23 Likes
I forgot about their judiciary shortage. That has been in New Jersey news for a while now.
Noted. Thanks.
1 Like
I don’t think it was ignored. It just wasn’t possible.
It would be interesting to see if others in the same court, if not the same judge, were sent to AK. If so, how long did it take from the ruling to be transferred. Same with the new transfer…have others been ordered to be transferred and if so, what was time frame?
I’m not a good enough Google-er to track it down. But that sure would tell if MB is being treated differently
10 Likes
With a broken hand too…
9 Likes
You’re very kind 
1 Like
It was ignored. There was no attempt to schedule at 3 months.
He simply scheduled for six months.
And this does not say try for three months, it says it shall happen in three months. Period.
Six months is not even close to three months.
I am sure no one would have complained at three months and two weeks. Six months is twice three months.
31 Likes
The judge may have assumed it wouldn’t be possible, but I’m not sure ignoring the three month check in because one is assuming that won’t be possible is how it should be handled.
17 Likes
Ok
Good point.
1 Like
Ooh, maybe you apprenticed in? That would make for an unusual scenario
4 Likes
Not just sickening and vile, but heartless and cruel. And posted with glee, as though she (LK) was taking great delight in making those accusations against GJ on the Internet, to cause as much hurt to GJ as possible. What kind of creature does that?
19 Likes
Perhaps. 
Unusual is about my speed.
9 Likes
Well, no worries, the trick with lawyering, as you know, depends…
7 Likes
Depends - It really is the answer to everything.
8 Likes
And given that we now know JK has no compunction about emailing judges who are hearing cases involving his daughter, I would not be one bit surprised to learn that someone put that bug in Taylor’s ear that if MB looked like a choir boy at his Krol hearing, it could be that the state shrink was right that MB was “faking” his mental state during the criminal trial. Thereby prompting Taylor’s out of line comment about MB’s appearance…
12 Likes
A quick Google search of NJ State Psychiatric Hospitals produced a list of dozens of hospitals. All but one has low ratings. What a shame. Again, Taylor could have easily stipulated Michael be placed in private facility of his choice with restrictions, but perhaps he can’t force an individual to be forced to spend their own $$ for court ordered care. IANAL so I have no idea. The bottom line is Taylor, Schellhorn and the State could not care any less about Michael Barisone’s welfare or any other court ordered patient. It is apparent to me the judicial system in NJ treats everyone as guilty regardless of verdict or length of time already incarcerated.
Someone up thread wondered if Taylor plans to simply continue court ordered confinement until Michael is held as long as Taylor feels a guilty sentence would have been…80 years??? 15 years as was the plea agreement if I recall correctly? 
I do hope someone who filed a complaint against Taylor also included the Krol requirements and how Taylor has already ignored the law in this case with the skipping of a required 3 month evaluation.
21 Likes
But since they are so short on judges, I doubt there will be any consequences to Taylor other than a slight reprimand such as, “Dude, be a little more careful about what you say.”
1 Like
Could MB not sue or form sort of appeal over this?
1 Like
