What basis do you have for your “beliefs” that JK intervened or attempted to intervene with the 1. MCPO, 2. Judge Taylor, 3. Schellhorn and 4. Judge Sceusi?
If what you “believe” is true, you’re smearing not just JK but all of these judges and court officers. Did you mean to do that?
I think it will depend on the source of the money in the bank. If she gets an allowance from a trust or structured settlement that’s probably income and she should probably get a K 1 and declare it on her taxes. That’s her income. If dad is simply paying her bills for her from his money it’s probably not her income.
IANAL or accountant or enrolled agent and the IRS works in mysterious ways
No is a complete sentence.
Why did they let her move in if they didn’t want her to, I don’t get it.
You left out the tipping point in your post: she came after the children with the false accusation to safe sport and the subsequent visit from CPS. If I were sitting on a jury and heard that the person came after the kids, their chances of winning their case will have left the building. (Setting up a scenario where the kids could have ended up in tempory foster care would threaten their emotional and mental health, and possibly their physical health. IMHO that is as damaging as if she had held a gun on them.)
No, @BigMama1. It’s not BS. I don’t “know if is false.” Just because I “have been told hundreds it is false” does not mean that you (g) have persuaded me of your viewpoint.
I’m not “blaming MB for not evicting her sooner”. I’m blaming MB for shooting her.
I think it’s ridiculous for you to be blaming LK for not leaving earlier when there is no evidence that she was clearly told that MB wanted her out. Even that information came from MBs attorney and not from MB himself.
The same normally that Lauren was lying about all over social media that her horses were being neglected and abused?
That normally is suddenly OK?
I don’t get why Lauren did not leave when it was clear she was not wanted and her father found her another place to go. So we can both be confused.
Good point.
What forever remains a mystery to me is why people believe and/or just take the K’s word for anything. Especially because it’s been proven, time and time again (and admitted to) that they lie. On social media and IRL. I think once in awhile, some grains of truth are there, but it baffles me when people just believe what is said so easily. Just taking someones word for it.
I think in the past, the family has gotten away with intimidating and/or no one calling them on their bluff or just retreating (as some people do because sometimes it’s just easier to cut your losses and slowly back away from the crazy). This is just purely my guess and view as an outsider based off of the info provided via the criminal trial and on these threads (which includes actual screen shots of comments made by the K’s).
I think with this civil trial they will have to actually back up what they are saying and/or provide real proof. As in proof and evidence that satisfies certain criteria. I’m not entirely sure that they’ll be able to do this in many instances. This is what happens when you lie, exaggerate, or have no grounds to stand on. For example, idk how one claims lost wages when one does not work and did not prior to the trial. It’s also possible that they are just throwing it all at the wall to see what will stick. Which, I mean, why not? (from their perspective).
I’m sure they’ll try to see how far their influences can reach… I mean why else would you email a judge? And they’ll find their limits.
Purely my speculations and I’m willing to be proven wrong with facts…which likely won’t be available until the trial progresses.
Uh if its true, its not a smear… Or defamation, its just a fact.
It wasn’t in the trial, it was in the comments and live chats on the YT feeds of people watching the trial. Although I do believe GJ said she was subpoenaed and ready to be a witness.
I didn’t read the post that this reply is to (thank you, ignore feature), but just in general, idk why some people don’t get this.
If it’s true, it’s not a smear. It’s what someone did. If they suffer as a direct result of their own actions, that is due to their own actions. Not someone else. I get that it is hard, at times, to take responsibility for our own actions, but some of us do, in fact, do that, and accept the reality that goes along with it.
People are also free to believe whatever. If it’s their belief, it’s not necessarily a smear or defamation (depends on a few things though).
What they can’t do, is insist that it’s fact and claim that it’s fact with zero proof. A belief does not equal fact. Granted, people do this IRL all the time.
Maybe the actual report to SS will be disclosed in the civil trial.
One possibility is that she made the report to SS to report the bullying of MB directed at herself, and when SS followed up asking whether minors were present, she mentioned verbal abuse of the minors.
The CPS person said on that stand that she was not there to investigate child sexual abuse by MB but child neglect by MHG.
If it were a false accusation, that’s up to SS or CPS to determine.
Please note: When CPS comes out to investigate, the children would only be removed if they found the situation dangerous. They would not remove the children if the concerns in the report were not substantiated in their investigation.
In the midst of the fraught situation, LK feared her horses would be harmed.
After the shooting, two different people thought the horses would be cared for normally. Also, while his daughter lay in a coma, JK had more important things to worry about than the horses.
Half halt!
Thank you for finally agreeing to what most of us have been saying since day 1, that it made no sense that Jonathan Kanarek and Robert Guy Goodwin/Jim E Starks went to the farm the very next day while his daughter/fiance lay in a coma.
That was LK’s version too….in the manifesto written a few days prior to the shooting. Before the shooting, LK’s version was that her agreements were in writing and recorded for enforcement purposes…
My, my, how much has changed….if they were in writing, where did they go? Office spelunking?
LK knew her horses would not be harmed - that was just another of her lies. Many, many lies. She knew she was not wanted there long before the shooting - she was all over Facebook whining about it and supposedly looking for a place to haul horses to - and had many offers for help. She could have had those horses out in 48 hours or less. But she demurely refused all offers (with a changing list of excuses) so apparently the horses were not in any danger - and she knew that. She just thought saying that was another pawn to be played in her Super Smart game of 5D chess that she thought she was playing.
It is too bad that we cannot see those FB posts any more - I remember some posting in frustration along the lines of - so are the horses threatened or NOT? And if they are - why not move them - tonight?! I can be there?! But she had zero intention of moving them - it was all for show. And slowly, many who had offered help caught on to that…
Had LK and RG always done all the feeding for her horses? All the turnout? All the bringing in? All the blanketing? All the mundane everyday stuff? I know RG was wrapping the one mare at night… but I seriously doubt that RG and JK rushing to the barn the next day had much to do with horse care as they would be taken care of no matter what happened.
Because that is what actual caring horse people do.
Most people are afraid of lawsuits. Considering the timing, maybe MB was still dealing with his divorce and didn’t want to deal with it at the time.
It didn’t sound to me like at the time he was refusing her as a client, just no room at the inn until the house was fixed. That should have been something normal people understood…
I have a friend who is an attorney. She frequently represents families whose children have been seized by CPS. She would vehemntly disagree with your statement.
THIS!!! 
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
