MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

The only thing I wonder about is what became of the dog (poor Rosie) at the end of the day on August 7th? If they left her there in the house, then it would make sense that somebody had to go back and get her the following day. But that would not take two people. And it would not require going to the barn if the dog was in the house.

Do I recall correctly that MHG or someone else ended up calling 911 on that day, August 8th, due to their interactions with RG and JK at the barn?

I will stipulate that people can certainly do irrational things under stressful circumstances. But it certainly does not seem as if it would take two people to pick up one dog if that’s the only reason they were there. Especially with LK in the hospital at the time.

6 Likes

Nope. Not agreeing. What I actually said was that JK and RG went to the farm to ensure the horses were being taken care of, after the huge disruption of “the incident”, and fairly readily agreed to the horse care offered by RC and the HH staff. I think JK and RG readily agreed to whatever the farm staff offered because they had much more pressing concerns.

Do you think that it is likely to be true that not just one but three officers of the court permitted themselves to be unduly influenced by JK?

I don’t. I think it’s an insult to Judge Taylor, DA Schellhorn, and Judge Sceusi.

But you (g) don’t need to worry about being sued for defamation. No one would take the smear seriously enough tor any of these reputable public servants to show damages. It just demonstrates how low Eggbutt will go to smear her enemies.

3 Likes

If he didn’t want her living in the farmhouse, he could have refused to let her live there and lost her as a client.

He apparently wanted her as a client enough to through in the apt. He said on 48 Hours that he agreed to her living in the farmhouse, because ‘there were bills to be paid’.

1 Like

I am wondering what would happen if she withdraws her lawsuit and BN is in fact handling it on a contingency basis. Would he charge them for his accrued expenses? Or would he just suck it up and absorb the loss (and report it as a business loss on his tax return)?

1 Like

Maybe one needed to act as bait while the other pounced on her from behind to get a muzzle on her?

7 Likes

Any updates on Jonathan Kanarek’s ( @Inigo-montoya ) totally inappropriate email to the judge in the civil case?

16 Likes

She has claimed that it is “her money.” Daddy apparently “manages” it for her - which brings up all kinds of questions as to why a 40 y/o isn’t allowed access to her own funds.

14 Likes

And surely she is telling the truth

5 Likes

Contingency doesn’t mean that you pay $0 up front, necessarily.

In many cases it is expenses only or a reduced hourly rate in exchange for a proportional payment of a verdict. The expenses involved in depositions, etc are still significant, and often still payable by the client.

12 Likes

Maybe this is why Lauren Kanarek is refusing to sit for a deposition in the civil case she filed.

8 Likes

So, since Judge Sceusi forwarded JK’s ex parte communication attempt to Silver (I assume because he is the one subpoenaing JK), what is the likelihood he’ll ignore the quash motions and grant the contempts because the wrong party has petitioned the courts? Usually the courts consider it pretty important to get the standing to approach the court correct. I mean legally, as they stand right now, isn’t it supposed to be interpreted that JK/KK have not even addressed the court.

5 Likes

What kind of effing idiot doesn’t get it that she should leave if she doesn’t feel safe there? Or that doesn’t feel welcome there (because of all the alleged “bullying” from various folks at the farm)? Or doesn’t feel that her horses are safe there?

What kind of horrid, despicable creature instead orchestrates a campaign of harassment, cyberbullying, illegally recording private conversations, illegally accessing private offices and quarters, sneaking around at night in a ninja outfit, calling city officials regarding code violations for the SOLE PURPOSE of getting someone else thrown off of HIS PROPERTY, filing false reports with Safesport for the SOLE PURPOSE of trying to destroy someone’s business and reputation and romantic relationship, etc.?

I call absolute BS that she didn’t realize she was no longer wanted at HH.

50 Likes

It is a very confusing scenario. Everyone hated each other and no one wanted anyone around but none of them would make any moves lol

1 Like

You do not have to call absolute BS on that because even LK says that is the case. Then she figuratively stands on her head and claims she was never asked to leave.

12 Likes

I can’t imagine what they could have sued for?

Why would Michael make any move to leave his own property and leave a drug addicted lying squatter and her laundry boy there? So her clean up man, a.k.a. Jonathan Kanarek or IM, could finally figure out how to grift the entire farm from Michael?

He went to the police and engaged an attorney. All appropriate steps.

There is absolutely no way in hell I would leave my own farm!

38 Likes

Interesting, my friend works for CPS (In Canada) and they basically have to be almost dead or heading there quick to be removed from families. The goal is always to keep the family together. Maybe different in the US.

That’s not remotely what was said. I asked why MB et all would allow her to move in if they were all not wanting her to? MB didn’t own that farm so not sure how they could take it?

They had no grounds to sue people here either but that did not stop Lauren Kanarek from sending out threatening private messages to lots of people.

The goal is to scare people into compliance, not actually sue them.

Edit to change emails to private messages.

:hatched_chick:

23 Likes