MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

I tried to post it but my phone is telling me to open an app. I hate my phone and my tech support is in middle school right now.

27 Likes

I’m more thinking of hey, it could fund an extra bed per year at a mental health step-down facility…

7 Likes

Nagel response to Schellhorn’s letter.pdf (57.8 KB)

I managed to redeem myself on the traffic lights.

21 Likes

Thank you!

Here you go.

Bruce, once again, is filing something on behalf of someone he doesn’t represent. In this case, RG.

Nagel response to Schellhorn’s letter.pdf (57.8 KB)

17 Likes

Seems a bit tone deaf if you ask me, considering the current motions in front of the court and her parents timely and cooperative response to their subpoenas….

11 Likes

Hmm. I did not know that. Small world. Or maybe a small court system there?

What a generous guy!

4 Likes

Whenever this comes up, I always feel the need to point out that she testified under oath in court that they could not afford to stay at the farm in New Jersey unless they worked out some sort of barter arrangement for the bills.

17 Likes

Seriously. Just ask them! They will respond accordingly!! Just like the parents…

Also - you can ask for the phones, but you have to give them to LK first so she can delete any relevant cough I mean irrelevant information first.

19 Likes

Yes, I realize that. But she also claimed to have unlimited means. So one of the claims is not accurate, clearly. Gee, so strange that Lauren Kanarek is lying.

image
This made me laugh.
Because that side is so willing to respond.

20 Likes

The phrase the jumped out at me in that letter was “more glaringly offensive.” Was it really more glaringly offensive than JK contacting the judge directly??

26 Likes

This is just a weird opposition motion. Why block the request? The DA has the information, saves time and money to get it from the DA than trying to find it from RG or Lk. Plus, it’s not going to be on then if the info slight isn’t in those records.

I mean I get that there could be some bad stuff there for Lk, but she’s the one who typically answers requests with “go get it yourself”. So the defendants are doing that, and now she’s saying that’s not fair?

Man i hope this judge gets sick of these people soon. I’m sick of them.

29 Likes

Did anyone else laughed put loud at this emotional, dramatic letter! “Shockingly”? Really? He thinks these requests are shocking? Does he know his client and her parents?

18 Likes

And on the heels of IM’s antics too….not a great look to present to the judge….

22 Likes

All of this is just so very weird.

Judge S is probably sitting in chambers cursing the day they called him out of retirement.

18 Likes

Hopefully he is laughing at the stupidity of the situation.

7 Likes

The regulating associations usually come down hard on the unauthorized practice of law. So JK might want to be clear he’s not representing KK.

14 Likes

About the part about privilege……it still seems like they are trying to present the texts from JK as privileged because he is an attorney….

11 Likes

I’m guessing because they are very incriminating or at least make them look really bad. So if they can get them excluded by calling them privileged, then they can slip slap those hands and call it honkytonk all the way to the bank. Right?

11 Likes