Seems a bit tone deaf if you ask me, considering the current motions in front of the court and her parents timely and cooperative response to their subpoenas….
Whenever this comes up, I always feel the need to point out that she testified under oath in court that they could not afford to stay at the farm in New Jersey unless they worked out some sort of barter arrangement for the bills.
Yes, I realize that. But she also claimed to have unlimited means. So one of the claims is not accurate, clearly. Gee, so strange that Lauren Kanarek is lying.
This made me laugh.
Because that side is so willing to respond.
The phrase the jumped out at me in that letter was “more glaringly offensive.” Was it really more glaringly offensive than JK contacting the judge directly??
This is just a weird opposition motion. Why block the request? The DA has the information, saves time and money to get it from the DA than trying to find it from RG or Lk. Plus, it’s not going to be on then if the info slight isn’t in those records.
I mean I get that there could be some bad stuff there for Lk, but she’s the one who typically answers requests with “go get it yourself”. So the defendants are doing that, and now she’s saying that’s not fair?
Man i hope this judge gets sick of these people soon. I’m sick of them.
Did anyone else laughed put loud at this emotional, dramatic letter! “Shockingly”? Really? He thinks these requests are shocking? Does he know his client and her parents?
I’m guessing because they are very incriminating or at least make them look really bad. So if they can get them excluded by calling them privileged, then they can slip slap those hands and call it honkytonk all the way to the bank. Right?