No need to be snarky now! Wasn’t that advice you just gave out, although no one asked for it?
13 Likes
Where was the snark? Can you please point it out as I am confusion. Also confused why just a few posts ago you said you don’t pay attention to me but now you’re all over me. Focus on the case or the pully rein and scary bits won’t be enough for the Mod.
1 Like
If you are the type that really wants to file illegal false reports, because that is how your roll, then do the first step (leave with your horses if you think you or they are at risk) and then file your illegal false reports, after you and your animals are safe.
You (the person filing the illegal false reports) will still be kind of a jerk for filling illegal false reports but at least you will have moved your horses and you first so no one can then turn around and show it as a fact that you were not really scared.
12 Likes
I think RC regularly brought her gun on her travels to NJ.
5 Likes
Well, we don’t know what we don’t know, do we?
Boarding or training agreement?
Some agreement negotiated by JK?
I can’t imagine, at 40, needing my parents to negotiate a new boarding agreement/location for me and my horses, but everyone agrees and admits it took lawyers, parents, etc to do that for some reason, for LK.
Apparently these people like to complicate the simple, basics of everyday life.
11 Likes
Having worked Family Court for 17 years I can say that kids are taken all the time. When they aren’t they sometimes die and the next day the newspapers are having front page coverage of how social services were negligent in their duties and then the agency goes through a name change and gets a new boss. This has happened numerous times in my years there. So the agencies are quick to take the kids.
16 Likes
Yes. Sadly, not wanting to evict her for possibly kindness is kind of wiped out by shooting her.
2 Likes
She seemed to think whatever the agreement was, that it was long lasting and irrevocable enough that MB agreed to lifetime board and training of a specific horse. So, threatening to “enforce” a lengthy contract term….
8 Likes
Regarding the witnesses who were subpoenaed but then Judge Taylor would not allow them to actually testify.
Did he make that decision before or after they had already traveled to New Jersey in order to testify?
2 Likes
I’ve been a psych major (switched to business) and sociopaths and psychopaths are easily mixed up.
Both lack empathy. Psychopaths are better at parroting emotions, and may even have a moral compass they choose to ignore. Sociopaths are less able to present as “normal” and often behave erratically.
7 Likes
Who knows. Keep in mind, IM said they were subpoenaed for the criminal trial. Considering the briefs say IM is JK, Taylor also didn’t allow him to be called in the criminal trial.
4 Likes
It may very well be that if her grandparents are wealthy they have set up some kind of generation skipping trust for her and her sisters. So it would be “her” money. However due to her addiction problems maybe her father has a role in the administration of the trust or somehow is able to restrict access to the funds without out his approval. So he might have to go to the bank to authorize withdrawals. Or maybe the parents have established some sort of trust for their children and because of past behavior Lauren can’t automatically get her hands on the funds. This would be a smart thing to do if your daughter has addiction problems.
AND maybe the requirement to live on the farm was not actually a financial one when negotiations were made. Lauren being on the farm would make it easier to keep tabs on her and limit her exposure to “bad influences”. If Daddy paid for an apartment, it would be a whole lot easier for the pusher guy to make daily visits and maybe they might let some deadbeat druggie friends move in. A whole lot harder to do that on the farm where somebody might call the cops if strange people are making an appearance. So maybe it was presented to MB as a financial need but actually it was a way to control her behavior.
Just a theory.
9 Likes
Yep, I know of two myself. One of them laughed at him, the other I’m not sure.
1 Like
Exactly
She’s threatened me with lawsuits at least twice 
15 Likes
I knew the sweetest Belgian cross who was tortured with that bit. When we got him, he used to try to hide in the stall from people. I would just hang out in front of the stall and sing to him.
His tongue was nearly severed. Thankfully he ended up in the perfect home.
7 Likes
Not stalking if a person is stupid enough to leave their information open to public view. For example, if I open up my Venmo account it will show people I know or may know and their information - whether I want to see it or not.
14 Likes
She has threatened me, as well as many here, multiple times.
What did I do to her you ask?
I dared to suggest she might not want to comment on a public forum about the case before it was tried.
You see how that worked out for her!
29 Likes
The first one was for cyber bullying. I laughed at her because she was the one cyber bullying.
The second one she “told the DA” I was doxxing her because I posted a screenshot of her PUBLIC record. I told her at best that was a civil liability case. She said it was a criminal case and I laughed and told her she should look up the difference. She didn’t appreciate that.
35 Likes
Your theory here is interesting to me and something I have always wondered about. They were all living in the farmhouse like a happy little family. Enjoying takeout together in the kitchen, etc. Then poof. And yet the self-described “woman of unlimited means” did not blow that popsicle stand and get an apartment or even an RV. Back in college when I had a crummy roommate who was holding the lease, I left. Or if a boyfriend who i neither liked nor trusted moved in, I left. I did not turn it into a territorial war.
24 Likes
