You have succumbed to believing a LK lie. Testimony in court suggested otherwise. He wasn’t desperate for money. Of course any client with multiple horses is nice, but given those owners always get a break on fees due to multiple horses it is in fact far more lucrative to have individual owners with individual horses. You just make more money that way.
This is one of the funniest things I have read in this thread. Thank you for the laugh.
You are so creative. (Isn’t that what the State’s professional witness said about Lauren Kanarek?)
Seriously!!! Someone actually thinks the 20 or so of us here are cross posting all over the internet?!! Wow! That is probably the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.
Are we on Reddit, DH, YT, CoTH FB, ABC, Twitter, IG too? Man, I didn’t know I had that much time.
But that begs the question, why haven’t “they” gone to the other sites and posted their arguments there? Yeah, it must just be us and not them. But I wonder why? Do they have robes and tiaras too?
Why yes. The amateur analysis has been going on for some time here. I’m sure some desperate hack on YouTube would be happy to make a little more money doing PR work. They’ll need a script though but it’s all here.
I sure wish they would post something on the court site. I wish they would upload Jonathan Kanarek’s email to the judge. That has to be an interesting read. I mean what does someone say in a note to the judge that they know is against the rules for them to send?
Edit to add the G on the end of something that I noticed was missing after I was quoted.
But it would be interesting to see how one even addresses a letter to a judge that they know they are not supposed to be writing to.
Dear < First Name > ?
Or do you pretend to be all formal and call the judge ‘your honor’ thinking it will negate the negative part where you were not suppose to be writing this letter in the first place?
That kind of stuff is interesting to me, so I really wish that letter would be included in the other stuff online.