This can be easily disputed with testimony and financial information. According to testimony, it took 40-50k a month to operate HH. 5k would be about 10 percent of operating costs. Hardly keeping anything afloat. It’s a weak argument. Also, MB hasn’t opened his mouth to dispute that fact yet either. MB was able to develop HH, purchase/own the farm in FL, have numerous investments, and establish wealth far before LK ever entered the picture. Sure, he went through a divorce but still maintained millions in assets just by his ownership in the 2 facilities and horses alone, let alone all the investments we don’t even know about.
ETA: I forgot to mention the relevance to this thread… JK may moan and groan about MB needing LK financially in the 48 Hours episode but all of his groaning can, and I’m certain will, be easily disputed in the civil trial. Easily disputed with legitimate financial documents, etc.
I keep looking back at old IM posts and they are interesting! This one stands out (and may explain some of JK’s legal prowess or more accurately, lack thereof):
I want to take this moment to say that if it is true that (upon information and belief) IM is JK, I apologize to the several of you who suggested to me privately that IM was JK. I know I scoffed at that. I have messaged a few of you, but at this point I can’t remember who all said that to me (it was a LOT, you eagle eyed old hags, you!). Mea culpa.
I’m confused. Why are we pondering more horses? She already had Two she brought with her, one in retirement, purchased JayT from Michael and the overseas horse from someone else before she ever moved to the farm, if I understand her testimony correctly. So, 5 horses total.
@Knights_Mom - you feature prominently in the exhibits
These people were warned by literally EVERYONE that engaging in debates on the forums about the facts of a case while there was civil litigation in process was a BAD idea. But… they clearly think they are smarter than everyone else.
The way I understood it, she owned all the other horses, the only one she bought while there was JayT. None of the other horse purchases had anything to do with Michael. She was boarding two horses, and that multiplied.
Holy cow. That was some excellent legalese! And the fact that he outlines precisely how JK and KK may have been involved in the campaign of terror is compelling.
But the price of board/barter/whatever did not multiply proportionally. So, why would Michael want to help her collect more at his expense? Interesting theory I suppose.
I agree with you. It makes no sense that anyone would consider someone that he needs to have around for her money or why anyone would think it is a positive that she brings more horses but no more money.
On the other topic - It is such a pleasure to read the response by these two lawyers. They are brilliant men.
I love that it was brought up that both Kirby and Jonathan Kanarek feel they are above the law.
Puts them on the hook and he can add them to the case. It probably causes other headaches for them as well as far as being a witness, testimony though I’m not a trial lawyer so I can’t exactly say.
It is important to know as fact that LK came to Hawthorne Hill with all of her horses with the exception of Jay-T, who she purchased directly from Michael.
I screenshotted a specific part of Deininger’s filing with the respect to Kirby and her transcripts…
It ties to the SafeSport complaint. Apparently JK and KK actually wrote a “Summary” of the SS complaint about MB for LK, and this was part of what was submitted right before the shooting, which apparently resulted in SafeSport urgently contacting local CPS to go out and do a welfare check with respect to MHG’s kids.
It’s also interesting to pause and think about the fact that ILLEGAL RECORDINGS were part of the evidence submitted to SafeSport regarding MB. If he gets released at the 6 month hearing, at some point he should have the opportunity to appeal his SafeSport ban (if they don’t choose to amend or lift it). I would think the fact that these recordings were made illegally, as part of a broader intentional harassment campaign… well… that might be something that helps him make the case his ban should be overturned.