MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@FitzE

How could any native English speaker read that and interpret it was specifically pertaining to posts on COTH?

The mind reels!

Here’s how. There was an answer to a different question in the interrogatories that was specifically referring to COTH.

I saw the one specifically referring to COTH, but not the more general one posted above. Until now.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Did you mean “But her emails”, with her referring to Hillary Clinton? That I would have understood.

But thanks for clarifying it has absolutely nothing to do with case.

It’s a cultural reference.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Moderator_1

Thank you for the help!

I’m having trouble getting it to work on an iPhone. I will experiment further, but so far I can only laboriously delete the part of the quote I want to eliminate.

[erinmeri]

As to the assertions by @CurrentlyHorseless and @hut-ho78 that Lauren Kanarek didn’t direct attorneys to her social media, I offer this:

Especially hilarious given my own screenshots of her Pinterest board.

[ohnoO]

Try my method. Highlight the sentence or two you want to reply to. Then when the “quote button” (for lack of a better description) appears—ignore it and just hit the reply arrow.
I don’t use my phone for this site, so I don’t know if that will work on a phone.

[SillyHorse]

@Knights_Mom

The ONLY thing missing from this recurring speech is “But his emails”.

You are giving LilRanger competition for winning the internet today. This the clear winner in the “Most Pithy” category.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

What did you mean by “the only thing missing from this recurring speech is ‘But his emails’.”

OMG! It’s a reference to Hilary Clinton’s emails and the constant, constant deflecting of all this by saying, “but, but, but her emails!”.

AND STOP WITH THE NESTING!

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Here’s how. There was an answer to a different question in the interrogatories that was specifically referring to COTH.

I saw the one specifically referring to COTH, but not the more general one posted above. Until now.

Can you direct me to that question? Because Mr Deininger used this: (which @erinmeri also posted).

And I posted, well, you already saw it.

I’m not seeing any questions limited to COTH in the pertinent pleadings filed yesterday.

[Ambitious_Kate]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m having trouble getting it to work on an iPhone. I will experiment further, but so far I can only laboriously delete the part of the quote I want to eliminate.

If you can highlight you can quote. Highlight what you want to quote by puttinig your finger on the beginning of the desired text and dragging your finger to the end of the region desired. Hit the “quote” floater that pops up at the start of the highlited material. If it doesn’t, then hit the “reply” arrow thingy at the bottom of the window. The highlighted text will appear in the COTH reply window for you to begin your full reply. I am certain one can highlight on an iphone. Hopefully that helps.

Edited for clarity

[ohnoO]

Thanks. I will add that on my iPad the highlight works better to start at the end of the quote and work up from there

[hut-ho78]

@jvanrens

@hut-ho78

@ekat

Would a bug sweeper even pick up a little pocket voice recorder like Lauren testified she bought off Amazon? Does it look for something else?

Yes.

Which question are you responding “yes” to? Both of them? Just curious since I know nothing about bugging.

How Listening Devices Work | Detect Eavesdropping Devices

How to Sweep For Bugs and Hidden Cameras

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

Here’s how. There was an answer to a different question in the interrogatories that was specifically referring to COTH.

I saw the one specifically referring to COTH, but not the more general one posted above. Until now.

Can you direct me to that question? Because Mr Deininger used this: (which @erinmeri also posted).

And I posted, well, you already saw it.

I’m not seeing any questions limited to COTH in the pertinent pleadings filed yesterday.

I noticed and read her response to question 2, which referred to bulletin boards.

Right there on the same page, question 1 refers to social media more generally, but I did not read that. I don’t know why.

Thank you for posting these. She basically answered on both accounts that she considered the question to provide all her posts on all accounts overly broad and overly burdensome and said that to the extent that the posts exist, they are online.

On the upside, I think I have learned how to select part of a quote. (I’m not sure.)

ETA: Nope, it didn’t work. I highlighted part of it, but the whole quote appeared.

[yaya]

Where does one find the actual interrogatories on the court site? Are they only partially given as part of some other filing?

[Sdel]

So, there are “hundreds” of photos out there of LK living her life. That seems to be a lot of evidence that LK’s claims of Covid fear are indeed unfounded.

But, I must ask, how do you know?

Is it in the same way you “knew” Seeker was mocking us (because “we” just thought she was drunk posting)? Is it in the same way that you knew IM was “credible” when he was posting very “not public knowledge” stuff?

[Warmblood1]

@CurrentlyHorseless

In terms of social media platforms other than COTH , where did LK say ‘go find it yourself on line’?

You read the court documents… right? All of her social media accounts have been provided multiple times in the documents.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I noticed and read her response to question 2, which referred to bulletin boards.

Right there on the same page, question 1 refers to social media more generally, but I did not read that. I don’t know why.

Thank you for posting these. She basically answered on both accounts that she considered the question to provide all her posts on all accounts overly broad and overly burdensome and said that to the extent that the posts exist, they are online.

On the upside, I think I have learned how to select part of a quote. (I’m not sure.)

So you see that it’s only her answer that specifies COTH. Glad we are clear on that.

It does look like you had some success on the quote! That’s cool. It took me a while on the iPad too. But @ohnoO gave a good description of how it works for me.

[ekat]

@yaya

Where does one find the actual interrogatories on the court site? Are they only partially given as part of some other filing?

Yes, they are included in other filings as issues arise from them. You have to hope the website is playing nice and dig through all of the filings.

[erinmeri]

Hilarious that apparently an acknowledgement that both @ekat and I provided repeatedly requested documentation isn’t being proffered. You asked, we answered!

[hut-ho78]

@Ambitious_Kate

@ohnoO

The “finger picture” also included text that went with the other pictures that also contained text.

That was my point. Its where she describes what she was doing that night, and the partying and going about living her life. I suppose he had no choice but to use that picture. Its where she talked about her activities.

This one, defiant little survivor that she is, may backfire on the attorney. She does not look healthy at all, quite fragile, as discussed during the trial. Hopefully, it’s been a restful and healthy summer.

[KurPlexed]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The issue is whether there was a reasonable expectation of privacy in the locker.

I’m 200 posts behind but I just wanted to chime in and say: HH and CH seem to be normalizing recordings. Legal or illegal. It’s absolutely mind blowing to normalize such a thing. When you have to get down to this level of legal or illegal you’re pretty much in the swamp? Like up to your necks?