Thanks for the reminder!
Regardless of the opinions of the judge and the prosecutors it was the jury that determines whether or not he was insane at the time of the shooting.
Actually, it was the state psychiatrist who said at the Krol hearing that she thought he was not delusional, and the judge went with the AKC committee that recommended commitment.
The defense psychiatrist said he was still delusional, but recommended intensive outpatient treatment.
Sometimes a judge will make a ruling, inform the parties, maybe by phone or email, then the judge will put it in writing, sign it, then file it, then someone uploads the Order to the Docket for all to see.
I’m guessing the self defense argument will get as much traction in the civil case as it did in the criminal case.
I’ll be surprised if MBs lawyers want to spend the time and expense on pursuing it, but perhaps they have an incentive to if they’re paid by the hour.
How does one get access to this calendar?
well there you go - summed up in 18 minutes
Pretty amazing isn’t it?
Just skimming the documents. I can’t find a motion made by any of the Defense attorneys for oral argument, only the Nagel/Rice request.
Wow is right.
I just watched this and it is really, really interesting. This guy deserves a fluffy bath robe, even if he does think the horse does all the work in horse dancing.
@CurrentlyHorseless and @hut-ho78, you should both watch this. This is what rational jurors will see during the civil trial.
Your post doesn’t carry any weight whatsoever. Now that the general public is asking questions USEF/SS may have to finally investigate ALL the complaints, eh?
Not to mention the comments. She’s not persuading/convincing many people.
I have been wondering if action can/will be taken while LK remains out of compliance. And if that is why she hasnt completed the training.
Thank you for the link. Had the judge and CS not made the comments about his appearance and accepted the jury verdict, I wouldn’t have the question about the punitive nature of sending MB to Greystone. The fact that they made the comments, in my opinion, seems to show that they did not accept the jury verdict but were still wanting to send him there. I think it would have been better to leave the comments out.
It was my understanding under Krol that MB met the requirements for release but I am also not an attorney.
Yes. I was pointing out that I don’t think the judge is required to grant them at all, even if the motion says they aren’t requested if he agrees with the motion. I think it is a false equivalence to think that because the oral arguments were denied, that automatically means the judge was going to rule in favor of the motion.
Ah. Thanks for the explanation.
Just for you @CurrentlyHorseless
Maybe this will explain things a bit better for you. If not, argue with him in the comments!
Try that link first and click Motion Calendar at the top.
If that doesn’t work, click https://www.njcourts.gov/calendars.html and click on Civil Motion Calendar
I am guessing that they put all the day’s filings in a folder that is set for a batch upload at some point - likely overnight when server traffic is otherwise fairly low.
Thanks for the links. Didn’t know to look for something like that.